Intel Processor N150 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Processor N150 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 present a stark contrast in benchmark data availability. The Intel part has four recorded Cinebench results, while the Qualcomm chip has no benchmark entries in the database. This asymmetry shapes the comparison.

The Intel Processor N150 delivers a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 422.5 and a single-core score of 153.15. Moving to Cinebench R23, the multicore result climbs to 2590.5, while single-core reaches 935. These figures place the N150 at the 28th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 1025.

The Snapdragon X1P-66-100 sits at the 50th percentile overall, but its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 due to the absence of any completed tests. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, and neither chip registers a win in direct matchup data.

Without recorded scores for the Qualcomm part, direct numerical deltas cannot be established. The Intel N150's nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T scores 1024 on average, putting the N150 0.1% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U also averages 1024, again a 0.1% advantage for Intel. The Intel Core i3-4340 averages 1026, which is 0.1% higher than the N150, and the Intel Core i7-5650U averages 1027, a 0.2% gap.

The N150's Cinebench R23 multicore result of 2590.5 indicates a modest multi-threaded capability for a 4-core, 4-thread part. The single-core score of 935 shows moderate per-thread performance. The R15 results, at 422.5 multicore and 153.15 single-core, reinforce the pattern of a low-power processor optimized for efficiency over raw throughput.

The Snapdragon X1P-66-100, with 10 cores and 10 threads, has a structural advantage in parallel workloads, but the lack of benchmark data prevents quantification. Its percentile rank of 50 suggests the database places it near the median of all recorded CPUs, though this ranking cannot be tied to specific test results.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Processor N150 wins in the only category where measured data exists: recorded benchmark scores. Its four Cinebench results provide concrete performance figures across both multicore and single-core tests. The N150's 6-watt TDP positions it for fanless or passively cooled designs, and its 10 nm Intel process node with Twin Lake architecture targets low-power mobile applications.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 wins on structural specifications that hint at higher performance potential. Its 10 cores and 10 threads double the thread count of the Intel part. The base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.00 GHz exceed the N150's 0.10 GHz base and 3.60 GHz boost. The Snapdragon's 4 nm TSMC process node is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node, which typically enables better power efficiency at higher clock speeds.

Memory bandwidth heavily favors Qualcomm. The Snapdragon supports dual-channel LPDDR5X with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the N150 uses single-channel DDR4, DDR5, or LPDDR5 with 38.4 GB/s. This 96.8 GB/s difference gives the Qualcomm part a substantial advantage in memory-bound workloads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The Snapdragon provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, while the N150 offers Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The newer PCIe generation and additional lanes support faster peripheral devices and more expansion options.

The integrated graphics differ as well. Qualcomm uses the Adreno X1-85, while Intel employs UHD Graphics 730. Neither has benchmark scores in the database, so graphics performance cannot be directly compared.

The Snapdragon's 35-watt TDP versus the N150's 6-watt TDP indicates a higher power ceiling, which typically allows sustained performance under load. However, the N150's lower power draw suits always-on, battery-conscious devices.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: Only the Intel Processor N150 has benchmark entries, with four Cinebench results: R15 multicore at 422.5, R15 single-core at 153.15, R23 multicore at 2590.5, and R23 single-core at 935. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has no recorded benchmarks.

Q: How does the Intel N150 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The N150's average benchmark score is 1025. It sits 0.1% ahead of the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, both averaging 1024, and 0.1% behind the Intel Core i3-4340 at 1026, and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-5650U at 1027.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: How do the clock speeds differ between the two chips?

A: The Intel N150 has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The Snapdragon X1P-66-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The Snapdragon X1P-66-100 supports dual-channel LPDDR5X with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel N150 supports single-channel DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the production statuses of these processors?

A: Both the Intel N150 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 have an active production status.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Processor N150 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 4 | 10 |

| Base clock | 0.10 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost clock | 3.60 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 6 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Process node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 12 MB (per module) |

| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Adreno X1-85 |

| Release date | 2024-11-19 | 2024-04-23 |

| Part number | SRPNR | X1P66100 |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 28 | 50 |

| Average benchmark score | 1025 | 0 |

The release dates differ by roughly seven months, with Qualcomm launching in April 2024 and Intel in November 2024. Neither chip has a recorded launch MSRP, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, also listed as the codename Twin Lake, and belongs to the Intel Processor generation based on Alder Lake-N. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The cache hierarchy consists of 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-66-100 uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation. Its architecture field is listed as null, but the Oryon codename indicates a custom CPU design. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. The cache layout differs substantially: 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3.

The L2 cache organization is a key architectural divergence. Intel uses a shared 2 MB pool across all four cores, while Qualcomm allocates 12 MB per module, which for a 10-core design suggests a multi-module arrangement. This gives the Snapdragon significantly more high-speed cache per core, which can reduce memory latency in multi-threaded workloads.

Both processors integrate graphics on-die, with Intel using UHD Graphics 730 and Qualcomm using Adreno X1-85. Neither has separate graphics benchmarks in the database, so relative GPU performance remains unquantified.

The memory controllers differ architecturally. Intel's single-channel controller supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5, while Qualcomm's dual-channel controller supports only LPDDR5X. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s is more than triple the N150's 38.4 GB/s, reflecting the dual-channel design and newer memory standard.

PCIe implementations also diverge. The N150 provides Gen 3 with 9 CPU lanes, while the Snapdragon provides Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. The newer generation and additional lanes enable faster NVMe storage and external GPU connectivity on the Qualcomm platform.

The manufacturing processes reflect different foundry strategies. Intel fabricates the N150 on its own 10 nm node, while Qualcomm relies on TSMC's 4 nm node. The smaller node typically allows higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, which aligns with the Snapdragon's higher base clock of 3.40 GHz despite a 35 W TDP.

The TDP difference of 29 watts between the two parts indicates different thermal envelopes. The N150's 6 W TDP suits compact, fanless devices, while the Snapdragon's 35 W TDP allows for more aggressive performance but requires active cooling in most chassis designs.

Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has a v-cache option. The database records no transistor counts or die sizes for either chip, so density comparisons cannot be made from recorded data.