Intel Processor N150 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Processor N150 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100. The recorded data shows zero wins for either processor in shared tests, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This means the comparison must rely on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the Intel Processor N150, the architectural specifications of both parts, and the performance percentile rankings.

For the Intel Processor N150, the recorded data includes four Cinebench results. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the N150 scores 422.5 points, while its single-core score is 153.15 points. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 2590.5 points, and the single-core score is 935 points. These results place the N150 at the 28th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 1025.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile ranking is 50, meaning it sits at the midpoint of all recorded CPUs based on the data available. The absence of benchmark entries means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for the Snapdragon in synthetic workloads.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Processor N150 provide context for its performance level. The AMD Phenom II X6 1075T scores 1024, which is 0.1% lower than the N150. The Intel Core i3-4340 scores 1026, 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U scores 1024, again 0.1% lower, and the Intel Core i7-5650U scores 1027, 0.2% higher. These margins are minuscule, indicating the N150 performs in a narrow band around the 1025-point average.

The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no nearest rivals listed in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking, however, suggests it is positioned above the N150 in the overall distribution, but the lack of concrete scores prevents a numerical delta from being calculated.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in nearly every architectural dimension. The Intel Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, part of the Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) generation, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses the Oryon codename, part of the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. The Snapdragon's process node is smaller, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, though the database does not list transistor counts or die sizes for either part.

Core counts differ significantly. The Intel N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads. The Snapdragon doubles the core count and thread count, which in multithreaded workloads generally provides a substantial advantage, provided the software can utilize all cores. The base clock of the N150 is listed as 0.10 GHz, an unusually low figure, with a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The Snapdragon's base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The Snapdragon's higher base clock and higher boost clock indicate a higher sustained frequency floor.

Cache hierarchies are also distinct. The Intel N150 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon's L1 cache is three times larger per core, and its L2 cache is six times larger per module, which can significantly reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Memory support differs as well. The Intel N150 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory with a single-channel memory bus and a maximum memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 supports only LPDDR5X memory, but uses a dual-channel memory bus with a maximum bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth is more than three times higher, which benefits memory-intensive workloads and integrated graphics performance.

PCIe connectivity also varies. The Intel N150 offers PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only), while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The Snapdragon's newer PCIe generation and higher lane count provide more bandwidth for storage and expansion devices. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both have integrated graphics: the Intel N150 uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Snapdragon uses Adreno X1-45.

Thermal design power shows a large gap. The Intel N150 has a TDP of 6 watts, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a TDP of 30 watts. The Snapdragon consumes five times the power budget, which correlates with its higher core count, higher clocks, and larger cache. The Intel N150's 6-watt TDP indicates a design focused on low power consumption, typical for fanless or passively cooled systems.

The release dates are close. The Intel N150 was released on 2024-11-19, and the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 was released on 2024-09-02. The Snapdragon came to market approximately two and a half months earlier. Both processors are listed as Active in production status, and both have locked multipliers. The Intel N150 uses an Intel BGA 1264 socket, while the Snapdragon uses a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket. Neither processor has a launch MSRP in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two processors with fundamentally different design targets. The Intel Processor N150 is a 4-core, 4-thread part with a 6-watt TDP, a 10 nm process node, and a single-channel memory bus. Its benchmark scores place it at the 28th percentile, with an average score of 1025. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 is an 8-core, 8-thread part with a 30-watt TDP, a 4 nm process node, and a dual-channel memory bus. Its percentile ranking is 50, but it has no recorded benchmark scores.

The Snapdragon's architecture suggests it should outperform the Intel N150 in multithreaded workloads, given its double core count, higher base and boost clocks, larger caches, and more than three times the memory bandwidth. However, the database does not contain direct benchmark evidence to confirm this. The Intel N150's scores show it competes closely with older desktop and mobile parts from AMD and Intel, all within a 0.2% margin of its average score.

For users working with software that scales across cores, the Snapdragon's 8-core configuration and higher TDP point toward stronger performance. For users prioritizing low power consumption, the Intel N150's 6-watt TDP is a clear differentiator. The data indicates the Snapdragon is positioned higher in the overall CPU distribution, but the lack of benchmark entries means the database cannot verify its real-world performance. The Intel N150, by contrast, has verified scores across two Cinebench versions, confirming its position near the 28th percentile.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Processor N150 has a TDP of 6 watts, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a TDP of 30 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, compared to the Intel Processor N150's boost clock of 3.60 GHz.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The Intel Processor N150 supports 38.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth with a single-channel bus, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 supports 135.2 GB/s with a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Processor N150 is built on a 10 nm process node by Intel, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC.

Q: Does the Intel Processor N150 have a higher benchmark score than the Snapdragon?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, so no direct comparison is possible. The Intel Processor N150 has an average benchmark score of 1025.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Processor N150 wins in power efficiency. Its 6-watt TDP is a fraction of the Snapdragon's 30-watt TDP, making it suitable for systems where heat dissipation and battery life are critical. The N150 also supports a wider range of memory types, including DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5, whereas the Snapdragon is limited to LPDDR5X. The N150's recorded Cinebench scores provide concrete evidence of its performance, and its average score of 1025 places it at the 28th percentile, with close competition from the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T, Intel Core i3-4340, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, and Intel Core i7-5650U.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 wins in raw architectural capability. It has 8 cores compared to 4, a base clock of 3.40 GHz compared to 0.10 GHz, a boost clock of 4.00 GHz compared to 3.60 GHz, and a 4 nm process node compared to 10 nm. Its L1 cache is 288 KB per core versus 96 KB per core, its L2 cache is 12 MB per module versus 2 MB shared, and its memory bandwidth is 135.2 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s. The Snapdragon also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes, while the N150 supports PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The Snapdragon's 50th percentile ranking, despite having no benchmark scores, indicates the database places it above the N150 in the overall distribution.

The data does not show a direct benchmark comparison between the two, so the wins are derived from specifications and percentile rankings. The Intel N150's advantage lies in its extremely low power draw and verified benchmark results. The Snapdragon's advantage lies in its core count, clock speeds, cache sizes, memory bandwidth, and process node. Users prioritizing low power consumption and passive cooling will find the N150's 6-watt TDP compelling. Users prioritizing multithreaded performance and memory-intensive tasks will find the Snapdragon's 8-core configuration and 135.2 GB/s bandwidth more aligned with their needs.