Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus Comparison
Intel Core 5 211E
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark data shows a decisive overall victory for the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, which wins 16 of 17 recorded comparisons. The single exception is a notable one: the Intel Core 5 211E takes the Cinebench R23 single-core test with a score of 2878 against 2439, a 18% advantage. This is the only test where the Core 5 211E leads, and it is a meaningful result for lightly threaded workloads.
Every other multi-threaded and general workload benchmark falls to the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, often by very large margins. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 44253 versus 20389, a 53.9% lead. The gap widens further in older Cinebench versions: R20 multi-core shows 24461 against 8563, a 65% difference, and R15 multi-core shows 6656 against 2055, a 69.1% difference. The pattern is consistent across the Passmark suite. Data compression results are 804322 versus 346757, a 56.9% advantage. Data encryption shows 59097 versus 17938, a 69.6% gap. Floating point math delivers 229491 versus 66402, a 71.1% lead. Integer math is closer, with 175986 versus 88117, a 49.9% advantage, but still a clear win.
The most extreme discrepancy appears in the prime number search test, where the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 615 versus 43, a 93% difference. This workload clearly favors the newer processor’s architecture and core count. Physics calculations also show a massive gap: 4064 versus 702, an 82.7% lead. Extended instructions score 63506 versus 21592, a 66% difference. Random string sorting results are 96945 versus 34308, a 64.6% gap. The multi-threaded Passmark score is 68574 versus 23833, a 65.2% lead. Single-threaded Passmark scores also favor the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, with 5068 versus 4006, a 21% advantage in both recorded instances of the test.
The average benchmark score reflects this dominance: the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus records 93785, while the Core 5 211E records 37829. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus sits at the 96th percentile of all CPUs in the database, whereas the Core 5 211E is at the 86th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus include the Intel Xeon 6520P (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 4564P (-1.5%), the AMD EPYC 9175F (-1.9%), and the AMD EPYC 4565P (-2.1%). The Core 5 211E’s nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (0.1%), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (-0.2%), and the Intel Core i9-14901E (-0.2%).
FAQ
Q: Which processor wins in single-core performance?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E wins the Cinebench R23 single-core test with 2878 points against 2439, a 18% lead. However, in the Passmark single-thread tests, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus records 5068 versus 4006, a 21% advantage.
Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?
A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus leads by 53.9% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (44253 vs 20389) and by 65.2% in Passmark multi-thread (68574 vs 23833). The margins range from 49.9% in integer math to 93% in prime number search.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93785, while the Intel Core 5 211E has an average score of 37829. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus ranks at the 96th percentile, and the Core 5 211E ranks at the 86th percentile.
Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, compared to 4.90 GHz for the Intel Core 5 211E. The base clocks are 3.70 GHz and 2.70 GHz, respectively.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus have ECC memory support enabled in the recorded data.
Q: What are the nearest rivals for each processor in the database?
A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is closest to the Intel Xeon 6520P (0% delta), followed by the AMD EPYC 4564P (-1.5%). The Core 5 211E is closest to the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (0.2%).
The Verdict
The recorded data points to a single conclusion: the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is the substantially faster processor in nearly every measurable workload. With 16 wins out of 17 head-to-head benchmarks and an average score roughly 2.5 times higher, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is the choice for anyone prioritizing throughput, multi-threaded rendering, encryption, or physics calculations. Its 96th percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database, with rivals in the Xeon and EPYC class.
The Intel Core 5 211E, while losing the overall comparison, does hold a specific advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core. That 18% lead indicates a particular strength in legacy single-threaded rendering workloads. However, its Passmark single-thread score is 21% lower, which contradicts the Cinebench result. The Core 5 211E’s 86th percentile ranking and its rival set of Ryzen AI and Core i9 processors place it in a lower performance tier.
For users who need maximum multi-core performance, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is the clear pick from the data. For users who specifically target Cinebench R23 single-core scores, the Core 5 211E offers a measurable advantage, but the overall benchmark record does not support a general recommendation for it over the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Intel Core 5 211E uses 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses 24 cores and 24 threads. The base clock is 2.70 GHz for the Core 5 211E and 3.70 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. The boost clock is 4.90 GHz versus 5.50 GHz. Thermal design power is 65 W for the Core 5 211E and 125 W for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.
Sockets differ: the Core 5 211E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851. The Core 5 211E has a 257 mm² die size, and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a 243 mm² die size. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 5 211E does not. Memory support differs: the Core 5 211E supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus supports only DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 211E and 115.2 GB/s for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. PCIe lanes are 16 for the Core 5 211E and 20 for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, both Gen 5.
Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The release dates are also different: the Core 5 211E launched on 2025-01-12, and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus launched on 2026-03-10. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 211E is $221, and for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus it is $299.
Architecture Differences
The architecture gap is significant. The Intel Core 5 211E is built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses a 3 nm process at TSMC. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 17,800 million transistors, while the Core 5 211E has no recorded transistor count. The codenames reflect different design generations: Bartlett Lake for the Core 5 211E and Arrow Lake Refresh for the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.
Cache hierarchies are substantially different. The Core 5 211E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core caches and the nearly double L3 capacity on the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus align with its higher core count and newer architecture.
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, while the Core 5 211E has no series designation. The generation labels also differ: the Core 5 211E is listed as “Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)”, and the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is listed as “Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)”. Both processors are marked as Active in production status and target the Desktop market segment.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus wins in all multi-threaded scenarios. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests all show it ahead by 53.9% to 69.1%. The Passmark suite confirms this across every workload: data compression (56.9% lead), data encryption (69.6% lead), extended instructions (66% lead), prime number search (93% lead), floating point math (71.1% lead), integer math (49.9% lead), physics (82.7% lead), random string sorting (64.6% lead), and multi-thread (65.2% lead). The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus also wins the Passmark single-thread tests by 21%. The data indicates this processor is optimized for heavy parallel workloads, encryption, and scientific calculations.
The Intel Core 5 211E wins only the Cinebench R23 single-core test, with an 18% advantage. This is an isolated result that does not appear in any other single-threaded test. The Passmark single-thread score for the Core 5 211E is 4006, which is 21% lower than the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus’s 5068. The data suggests the Core 5 211E’s win is specific to the Cinebench R23 rendering workload, not a general single-thread advantage. Its lower core count and older 10 nm process limit its performance in every other recorded benchmark. For most applications, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is the stronger choice; the Core 5 211E only shows a niche edge in one rendering test.