Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PTE and Intel Core Ultra 7 265F are both desktop processors from Intel, but they target different segments of the market. The Core 9 273PTE is a Bartlett Lake part on Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 265F is an Arrow Lake-S part on Socket 1851. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between the two, with the Core Ultra 7 265F winning all 17 recorded head-to-head tests. The Core 9 273PTE wins zero tests. The average benchmark score for the Core Ultra 7 265F is 64438, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 9 273PTE averages 31143, placing it in the 82nd percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows a complete sweep for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F across every benchmark category. There is no workload type where the Intel Core 9 273PTE comes out ahead. The Core Ultra 7 265F wins all 17 head-to-head tests, including every Cinebench iteration and every PassMark workload. The largest advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F comes in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 416 against 142 for the Core 9 273PTE, a delta of -65.9 percent. The smallest advantage is in PassMark single thread, where the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 4750 versus 3433, a delta of -27.7 percent.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Core Ultra 7 265F delivers scores that are roughly double those of the Core 9 273PTE. Cinebench R23 multicore shows 41980 for the Core Ultra 7 265F against 20445 for the Core 9 273PTE. PassMark multithread shows 49410 versus 24054. The Core Ultra 7 265F also leads in data compression, scoring 507018 against 258704, and in data encryption, scoring 39468 against 14253. The Core 9 273PTE has no category where it records a higher score, so its role is limited to applications that do not demand the performance levels the Core Ultra 7 265F provides.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and use different manufacturing processes. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake codename with the Arrow Lake-S architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The Core Ultra 7 265F has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the Core 9 273PTE does not have transistor or die size data recorded.

Core counts differ significantly. The Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads. The Core Ultra 7 265F has more physical cores but no hyper-threading, so its thread count is equal to its core count. The Core 9 273PTE has fewer cores but uses hyper-threading to reach 24 threads. Cache configurations also differ. The Core 9 273PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 7 265F has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 9 273PTE has more L3 cache overall, but the Core Ultra 7 265F has more L1 and L2 per core.

Clock speeds show a mixed picture. The Core 9 273PTE has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 265F has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The Core 9 273PTE has a higher boost clock, but the Core Ultra 7 265F has a substantially higher base clock. The Core 9 273PTE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 7 265F has a TDP of 65 watts.

Memory support differs. The Core 9 273PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Core Ultra 7 265F supports only DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory, while the Core Ultra 7 265F does not. The Core 9 273PTE has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Core 9 273PTE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics. The Core 9 273PTE uses Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses Socket 1851. The Core 9 273PTE launched on 2026-03-08 with a launch MSRP of $549. The Core Ultra 7 265F launched on 2025-01-06 with a launch MSRP of $379. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are consistent across every test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 4231 against 2060 for the Core 9 273PTE, a delta of -51.3 percent. In Cinebench R15 singlecore, the Core Ultra 7 265F scores 597 against 290, a delta of -51.4 percent. The Cinebench R20 multicore test shows 17631 for the Core Ultra 7 265F against 8586, and R20 singlecore shows 2488 against 1212, both with deltas of -51.3 percent. Cinebench R23 multicore shows 41980 against 20445, and R23 singlecore shows 5926 against 2886, again with -51.3 percent deltas.

PassMark results show wider variations in the deltas. Data compression favors the Core Ultra 7 265F at 507018 against 258704, a delta of -49 percent. Data encryption shows 39468 against 14253, a delta of -63.9 percent. Extended instructions show 39235 against 15952, a delta of -59.3 percent. Find prime numbers shows 416 against 142, the largest delta at -65.9 percent. Floating point math shows 173855 against 60673, a delta of -65.1 percent. Integer math shows 138078 against 82411, a delta of -40.3 percent. Multithread shows 49410 against 24054, a delta of -51.3 percent. Physics shows 3172 against 1917, a delta of -39.6 percent. Random string sorting shows 62439 against 28973, a delta of -53.6 percent. Single thread shows 4750 against 3433, a delta of -27.7 percent.

The data indicates that the Core Ultra 7 265F leads by roughly half in most multi-threaded tests, with deltas clustering around -51 percent. Single-threaded performance shows a smaller but still significant gap, with the Core Ultra 7 265F ahead by 27.7 percent in PassMark single thread. The biggest gaps appear in prime number finding, floating point math, and data encryption, where the Core Ultra 7 265F leads by more than 60 percent.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F outperforms the Intel Core 9 273PTE in every recorded test. For users who prioritize raw performance across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, the Core Ultra 7 265F is the clear choice. It delivers more than double the multicore score in Cinebench R23 and PassMark multithread, and it maintains a solid lead in single-threaded tests as well.

The Core 9 273PTE has some distinguishing features that the data records, such as support for DDR4 memory, ECC memory support, and integrated graphics. It also has a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz and a lower TDP of 45 watts. However, none of these features translate into a performance win in the recorded benchmarks. The Core 9 273PTE sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core Ultra 7 265F sits at the 93rd percentile.

The nearest rivals in the database confirm the positioning. The Core 9 273PTE's closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-12700F, with an average score of 31081 and a delta of 0.2 percent. The Core Ultra 7 265F's closest competitor is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, with an average score of 64640 and a delta of -0.3 percent. The Core Ultra 7 265F also sits near the AMD EPYC 7343 and the Intel Core i9-13900KS in the database rankings.

Users who need ECC memory support or a processor with integrated graphics on Socket 1700 may consider the Core 9 273PTE. Users who need maximum performance, higher memory bandwidth, and a newer architecture on Socket 1851 should select the Core Ultra 7 265F. The data shows no scenario where the Core 9 273PTE wins a benchmark, so the performance decision is straightforward.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core 9 273PTE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How much larger is the Cinebench R23 multicore score for the Core Ultra 7 265F?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265F scores 41980 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the Core 9 273PTE scores 20445, a delta of -51.3 percent.

Q: Which processor uses a 3 nm process?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which processor has no integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics. The Intel Core 9 273PTE includes UHD Graphics 730.