Intel Core Ultra 5 336H vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

# Intel Core Ultra 5 336H vs Intel Processor U302L

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H and the Intel Processor U302L occupy opposite ends of the mobile processor spectrum. The Ultra 5 336H is a 16-thread Panther Lake part built on Intel's 3 nm process, while the U302L is a 6-thread Raptor Lake-PS chip on 10 nm. The database records no shared head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors, so the analysis relies on recorded absolute scores for the Ultra 5 336H and architectural comparisons for the U302L, which has no benchmark entries in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Ultra 5 336H wins everywhere measurable, simply because the U302L has no recorded benchmark scores. The database lists 17 benchmark results for the Ultra 5 336H, covering Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core modes, plus a full PassMark suite. The U302L has an empty benchmark array, which makes direct performance comparison impossible from recorded data.

The Ultra 5 336H delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 and a single-core score of 3387. Its PassMark multi-thread score is 28545, and its PassMark single-thread score is 4013. These figures place it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 34485. The U302L sits at the 50th percentile, but with an average benchmark score of zero due to lacking recorded results.

The U302L's advantages exist only in non-performance domains. It uses a 15 W TDP versus 25 W for the Ultra 5 336H, indicating a lower power envelope. It also fits the Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 336H uses Intel BGA 2540. The U302L supports DDR4 memory alongside DDR5, whereas the Ultra 5 336H supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. These differences suggest the U302L targets systems where power draw and memory flexibility matter more than compute throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Ultra 5 336H uses Panther Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 3, on a 3 nm process node. The U302L uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS variant, on a 10 nm process node. Both chips are manufactured by Intel, but the process gap is substantial: 3 nm versus 10 nm.

Core counts diverge sharply. The Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads, indicating no hyper-threading. The U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads, meaning one core is hyper-threaded. The Ultra 5 336H's cache hierarchy is larger at every level: 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. The U302L offers 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 10 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs. The Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The U302L supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for it. Neither chip supports ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The Ultra 5 336H provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the U302L provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: the Ultra 5 336H uses Intel Xe3 Graphics, and the U302L uses UHD Graphics 80EU.

Clock speeds show a wide gap. The Ultra 5 336H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz. The Ultra 5 336H boosts to nearly double the U302L's peak frequency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The head-to-head array is empty, and the win counters show zero for both sides. Consequently, the analysis must rely on the Ultra 5 336H's absolute scores and the U302L's absence of recorded data.

The Ultra 5 336H's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 places it in strong contention with its nearest rivals. The database lists the Intel Core i7-13700HX with an average score of 34554, a delta of -0.2% relative to the Ultra 5 336H's average of 34485. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, a delta of 0.4%. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X scores 34260, a delta of 0.7%. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, a delta of 0.8%. These deltas are all within one percentage point, meaning the Ultra 5 336H's average benchmark score is statistically indistinguishable from those four established processors.

Individual PassMark results for the Ultra 5 336H show particular strengths. Data compression scores 280340, data encryption scores 21291, and extended instructions score 24542. Integer math scores 62070, floating point math scores 82415, and physics scores 2682. Random string sorting scores 34402, and find prime numbers scores 299.

The single-core results are equally informative. Cinebench R23 single-core scores 3387, R20 single-core scores 1422, and R15 single-core scores 341. PassMark single-thread scores 4013. These figures indicate a strong single-threaded performer, consistent with the 4.60 GHz boost clock.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. Core count: 16 versus 5. Thread count: 16 versus 6. Base clock: 1.90 GHz versus 1.20 GHz. Boost clock: 4.60 GHz versus 2.40 GHz. TDP: 25 W versus 15 W. Socket: Intel BGA 2540 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Panther Lake versus Raptor Lake. Process node: 3 nm versus 10 nm.

Cache sizes differ at every level. L1 per core: 192 KB versus 80 KB. L2 per core: 2.5 MB versus 1.25 MB. L3 shared: 18 MB versus 10 MB. Memory support: DDR5/LPDDR5X versus DDR4/DDR5. Memory bandwidth: 115.2 GB/s versus no recorded figure. PCIe: Gen 5, 12 lanes versus Gen 4, 8 lanes. Integrated graphics: Intel Xe3 Graphics versus UHD Graphics 80EU.

Release dates differ by nearly two years. The U302L was released on April 7, 2024. The Ultra 5 336H was released on January 4, 2026. Both are marked Active in production status. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The U302L has a launch MSRP of $285, while the Ultra 5 336H has no recorded launch MSRP.

Part numbers also differ: SA4RD for the Ultra 5 336H, SRPKGQ5CX for the U302L. The U302L's series field is null, while the Ultra 5 336H belongs to Core Ultra Series 3.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Ultra 5 336H boosts to 4.60 GHz, while the U302L boosts to 2.40 GHz. The Ultra 5 336H's base clock is 1.90 GHz, and the U302L's base clock is 1.20 GHz.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The U302L supports DDR4 and DDR5, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for it.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The Ultra 5 336H ranks at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the U302L ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the Ultra 5 336H compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ultra 5 336H's average benchmark score is 34485. The Intel Core i7-13700HX scores 34554 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333 (+0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X scores 34260 (+0.7%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222 (+0.8%).

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25 W, and the U302L has a TDP of 15 W.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one conclusion: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the superior performer by every measurable metric. The U302L has no benchmark results in the database, so any claim of performance parity or superiority for it would lack evidentiary support. The Ultra 5 336H's 16 cores, 4.60 GHz boost clock, 18 MB L3 cache, and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth make it a capable mobile processor, ranking at the 84th percentile and matching the average scores of four rival processors within one percentage point.

The U302L's case rests on power efficiency and platform compatibility. Its 15 W TDP is 10 W lower than the Ultra 5 336H's 25 W TDP. It uses the Intel Socket 1700, which may suit systems designed around that platform. It also supports DDR4 memory, which the Ultra 5 336H does not. These factors matter for specific system designs, but they do not translate into performance advantages in the recorded data.

Buyers choosing between these two should rely on the evidence. The Ultra 5 336H delivers measurable performance across Cinebench and PassMark suites, with strong single-thread and multi-thread scores. The U302L offers no recorded performance data, only a lower power envelope and broader memory compatibility. For workloads that depend on CPU throughput, the Ultra 5 336H is the only one with recorded proof of capability. For systems constrained by power or platform requirements, the U302L may fit, but its performance remains undocumented in the database.