Intel Core i9-14901TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235H Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14901TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H occupy different positions in the performance spectrum, and the recorded benchmark data shows a clear split based on workload type. The Core i9-14901TE is a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235H is a mobile processor with 14 cores and 14 threads. The data in the database shows that the Core Ultra 5 235H wins every recorded benchmark category, but the margin of victory varies significantly depending on whether the workload is single-threaded, multi-threaded, or focused on specific instruction sets.

The Core Ultra 5 235H dominates in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 25,598, which is a substantial figure for a mobile processor. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 30,091 further confirms this strength. The Core i9-14901TE, however, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. This means the comparison relies entirely on the measured results for the Core Ultra 5 235H and the architectural specifications of the Core i9-14901TE.

Single-thread performance also favors the Core Ultra 5 235H. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,613 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,359 indicate strong per-core capability. The Core i9-14901TE has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz compared to the Core Ultra 5 235H's 5.00 GHz, but without actual benchmark data for the desktop chip, the measured wins remain with the mobile processor.

Specialized workloads show the Core Ultra 5 235H's strengths in data handling. Its PassMark data compression score is 301,979, data encryption is 23,121, and extended instructions score is 23,354. These figures indicate strong performance in tasks that leverage modern instruction sets and parallel processing. The Core i9-14901TE, with its older Raptor Lake architecture, would likely fall behind in these areas, though the database lacks direct measurements to confirm this.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and use different manufacturing processes. The Intel Core i9-14901TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture, and is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. Its codename is Raptor Lake-R, and it is part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The die size is 257 mm².

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is from the Core Ultra Series 2, uses the Arrow Lake architecture, and is manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. Its codename is Arrow Lake-H, and it belongs to the Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake-H) generation. No die size is recorded for this part.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Core i9-14901TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 235H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The total L3 cache on the Core i9-14901TE is much larger, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access a large working set. However, the Core Ultra 5 235H has more L1 and L2 cache per core, which can improve per-core latency.

Memory support also differs. The Core i9-14901TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 235H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, but does not support ECC. The Core Ultra 5 235H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, a figure not provided for the Core i9-14901TE.

PCIe connectivity shows the desktop chip has more lanes. The Core i9-14901TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 5 235H supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core i9-14901TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arc Graphics 140T.

Power and physical specifications reveal their intended markets. The Core i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 watts and uses Intel Socket 1700. The Core Ultra 5 235H has a TDP of 28 watts and uses Intel BGA 2049, a socket designed for mobile integration. The Core i9-14901TE is a desktop part, while the Core Ultra 5 235H is a mobile part. Both have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports user overclocking. The Core i9-14901TE was released on 2024-06-30, and the Core Ultra 5 235H was released on 2025-01-12.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors, and the Core i9-14901TE has no individual benchmark scores recorded. All measured scores belong to the Core Ultra 5 235H. The Core Ultra 5 235H sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,522. The Core i9-14901TE is at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, indicating that no benchmark data has been collected for it.

Because the Core i9-14901TE lacks recorded scores, the analysis of relative performance relies on the nearest rivals of the Core Ultra 5 235H. The closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, which scores 37,762, a delta of -0.6 percent relative to the Core Ultra 5 235H. The Intel Core i5-13600K scores 37,685, a delta of -0.4 percent. The Intel Core i9-13900HK scores 37,425, a delta of 0.3 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F scores 37,313, a delta of 0.6 percent.

These deltas show that the Core Ultra 5 235H is tightly grouped with several other mid-range and mobile processors. It is slightly ahead of the Core i9-13900HK and the Core Ultra 5 225F, but slightly behind the Core i5-13600K and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. The differences are small, all within 0.6 percent, indicating that these processors perform at a similar level on average.

Looking at specific benchmark categories for the Core Ultra 5 235H, the Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2,580, and the single-core score is 364. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 10,751, and the single-core score is 1,517. The Cinebench R23 results show 25,598 multi-core and 3,613 single-core. These scores scale consistently across Cinebench versions, indicating stable performance gains in multi-threaded rendering as the workload increases.

The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths. Data compression scores 301,979, which is a high figure relative to the multi-thread score of 30,091. Data encryption scores 23,121, extended instructions score 23,354, and floating point math scores 93,509. Integer math scores 74,247, prime number finding scores 239, physics scores 1,985, and random string sorting scores 36,208. The single-thread score is 4,359, identical to the singlethread score, confirming consistency in the measurement.

The Verdict

The data in the database is one-sided in terms of measured results. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has a complete set of benchmark scores and sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile by default, which is not a meaningful comparison point.

For users considering a desktop processor, the Core i9-14901TE offers 8 cores and 16 threads, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and a large 36 MB L3 cache. It supports ECC memory and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are useful for workstation configurations. Its 45-watt TDP is higher than the mobile part but still modest for a desktop chip.

For mobile workloads, the Core Ultra 5 235H delivers measured multi-thread performance that competes with desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-13600K, which scores 37,685 on average, a delta of -0.4 percent. The Core Ultra 5 235H also outperforms the mobile Intel Core i9-13900HK by 0.3 percent. Its 28-watt TDP and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth make it a strong choice for thin-and-light laptops that need substantial compute capability.

The choice between these two processors depends on platform requirements. The Core i9-14901TE is the only option for an Intel Socket 1700 desktop build, and its ECC support and 16 PCIe lanes are features that matter for specific professional workloads. The Core Ultra 5 235H is a BGA 2049 mobile part, so it cannot be used in a desktop socket. Its measured benchmark scores show it handles multi-threaded rendering and data compression tasks well, but the lack of ECC support and only 8 PCIe lanes limit its appeal for certain server or workstation applications.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the Core Ultra 5 235H is the better performer in every measured category, but the Core i9-14901TE offers platform-specific features that the mobile chip cannot provide. The database has no scores for the Core i9-14901TE, so any performance comparison beyond architecture is speculative.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H does not.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H?

A: The average benchmark score is 37,522, and the processor sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HK?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235H has an average score of 37,522, while the Core i9-13900HK has an average score of 37,425, giving the Core Ultra 5 235H a delta of 0.3 percent higher.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has a TDP of 28 watts.