Intel Core i9-14901KE vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Intel Core i9-14901KE and Intel Processor N150 occupy opposite ends of Intel’s current desktop and mobile lineup. The former is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop part built for high-throughput workloads, while the latter is a 4-core, 4-thread mobile chip designed for low-power operation. The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, but the available specifications and the N150’s measured scores provide enough material to analyze their respective strengths. This analysis draws solely on the recorded data for both parts, including architecture, cache layout, memory support, and the N150’s Cinebench results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark results for the Core i9-14901KE and the Intel Processor N150. The Core i9-14901KE has an empty benchmark array, meaning no Cinebench or other test scores are recorded for that chip. The N150, by contrast, has four recorded Cinebench scores. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the N150 scores 2590.5 points. Its single-core score in the same test is 935 points. In the older Cinebench R15 suite, the N150 records 422.5 points in multi-core and 153.15 points in single-core. These numbers place the N150 at the 28th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 1025.

Without any recorded scores for the Core i9-14901KE, a direct numerical comparison is impossible. However, the Core i9-14901KE’s specifications indicate a far higher performance ceiling. Its boost clock reaches 5.80 GHz, compared to the N150’s 3.60 GHz maximum. The Core i9 also has double the physical cores and four times the threads. The N150’s nearest rivals in the database illustrate its performance tier: it sits within 0.2% of the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T, the Intel Core i3-4340, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, and the Intel Core i7-5650U. The Phenom II X6 1075T scores 1024, the Core i3-4340 scores 1026, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U scores 1024, and the Core i7-5650U scores 1027. The N150’s average of 1025 places it essentially in the middle of this group, with a delta of 0.1% against the Phenom II and Ryzen 5 PRO, and -0.1% against the Core i3-4340, and -0.2% against the Core i7-5650U.

These rival comparisons confirm that the N150 operates in a performance class roughly equivalent to early-to-mid 2010s desktop quad-cores and low-power mobile chips. The Core i9-14901KE, with its 5.80 GHz boost and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, belongs to a different category altogether. The data shows that the Core i9-14901KE is designed for tasks that demand sustained multi-threaded execution, while the N150 is tuned for efficiency and basic computing. Since the Core i9-14901KE has no benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison must rely on architectural differences and the N150’s recorded performance as a baseline.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use different underlying designs. The Core i9-14901KE is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and is part of the Core 14th Gen series. The N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, which the database classifies under the Intel Processor generation with an Alder Lake-N lineage. Both processors are manufactured on a 10 nm process node and produced by Intel, but the similarities end there.

The Core i9-14901KE has 8 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that enables simultaneous multithreading. The N150 offers 4 cores and 4 threads, with no hyper-threading support. The Core i9’s base clock is 3.80 GHz, while the N150’s base clock is recorded as 0.10 GHz, an unusually low figure that likely reflects a power-saving baseline. The boost clocks differ significantly: 5.80 GHz for the Core i9 versus 3.60 GHz for the N150.

Cache hierarchies reveal another major divergence. The Core i9-14901KE features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The N150 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i9’s per-core L2 allocation and 36 MB L3 pool provide substantially more on-die storage for active data. The N150’s smaller shared L2 and 6 MB L3 reflect its low-power design.

Memory support differs as well. The Core i9-14901KE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The N150 also supports DDR4 and DDR5, but adds LPDDR5 and uses a single-channel memory bus. The N150 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, while the Core i9-14901KE has no bandwidth figure in the database. The Core i9 supports ECC memory, while the N150 does not. PCIe capabilities also split the two: the Core i9 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the N150 offers Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ modestly. The Core i9-14901KE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the N150 uses UHD Graphics 730. Both are integrated solutions, but the Core i9’s higher-tier graphics unit aligns with its desktop positioning. The socket types are incompatible: the Core i9 uses Intel Socket 1700, and the N150 uses Intel BGA 1264. The Core i9 has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, whereas the N150’s multiplier is locked.

The die size is recorded only for the Core i9, at 257 mm². The N150 has no die size entry. The Core i9’s production status is Active, and so is the N150’s. Release dates show the Core i9 launched on June 30, 2024, while the N150 followed on November 19, 2024. The Core i9 targets the desktop market segment, while the N150 is a mobile part.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i9-14901KE wins in scenarios that demand raw processing power. Its 16 threads, 5.80 GHz boost clock, and 36 MB L3 cache make it suited for video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and other multi-threaded workloads. The dual-channel memory interface and Gen 5 PCIe support provide high bandwidth for data-intensive applications. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use cases. The unlocked multiplier allows tuning for users who need maximum sustained performance.

The N150 wins in efficiency and portability. Its 6 W TDP, compared to the Core i9’s 125 W TDP, makes it far easier to cool and power. The single-channel memory bus and low base clock reduce energy consumption. The N150’s support for LPDDR5 memory, in addition to DDR4 and DDR5, gives system designers flexibility for compact, battery-powered devices. The BGA 1264 socket means it is soldered directly to the motherboard, reducing the physical footprint. Its integrated UHD Graphics 730 handles basic display output and video playback without a discrete GPU.

The benchmark data for the N150 shows it performs at a level comparable to processors from a much older era. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 2590.5 and single-core score of 935 indicate it can handle everyday productivity, web browsing, and light media tasks. The nearest rival comparisons place it within 0.2% of chips like the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and Intel Core i3-4340, which were mainstream desktop parts in their time. The N150’s 28th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its entry-level positioning.

The Core i9-14901KE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its wins are inferred from specifications. The 5.80 GHz boost clock is the highest in this comparison, and the 16-thread count doubles the N150’s thread capacity. The 36 MB L3 cache is six times larger than the N150’s 6 MB. The Core i9’s 125 W TDP, while high, enables sustained clock speeds under load. For users with access to a desktop platform, the Core i9-14901KE delivers performance that the N150 cannot approach.

The N150 wins in scenarios where low power consumption is critical. Its 6 W TDP is roughly 5% of the Core i9’s 125 W TDP, making it suitable for fanless designs, small form factor systems, and battery-powered devices. The single-channel memory and integrated graphics reduce component count and system cost. The mobile market segment and BGA package reflect its intended role in laptops and mini PCs.

FAQ

Q: What is the core count difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor N150 does not.

Q: What are the recorded Cinebench R23 scores for the Intel Processor N150?

A: The N150 scores 2590.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 935 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: Do the two processors use the same socket?

A: No. The Core i9-14901KE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the N150 uses Intel BGA 1264.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Core i9-14901KE has a TDP of 125 W. The N150 has a TDP of 6 W.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core i9-14901KE has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The N150 has a boost clock of 3.60 GHz.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Intel Core i9-14901KE and the Intel Processor N150, based solely on the recorded data.

• Cores: 8 (Core i9-14901KE) versus 4 (N150)
• Threads: 16 (Core i9-14901KE) versus 4 (N150)
• Base Clock: 3.80 GHz (Core i9-14901KE) versus 0.10 GHz (N150)
• Boost Clock: 5.80 GHz (Core i9-14901KE) versus 3.60 GHz (N150)
• TDP: 125 W (Core i9-14901KE) versus 6 W (N150)
• Socket: Intel Socket 1700 (Core i9-14901KE) versus Intel BGA 1264 (N150)
• Architecture: Raptor Lake (Core i9-14901KE) versus Twin Lake (N150)
• Codename: Raptor Lake-R (Core i9-14901KE) versus Twin Lake (N150)
• Generation: Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) versus Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N)
• Die Size: 257 mm² (Core i9-14901KE) versus not recorded (N150)
• L1 Cache: 80 KB per core (Core i9-14901KE) versus 96 KB per core (N150)
• L2 Cache: 2 MB per core (Core i9-14901KE) versus 2 MB shared (N150)
• L3 Cache: 36 MB shared (Core i9-14901KE) versus 6 MB shared (N150)
• Memory Support: DDR4, DDR5 (Core i9-14901KE) versus DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 (N150)
• Memory Bus: Dual-channel (Core i9-14901KE) versus Single-channel (N150)
• Memory Bandwidth: Not recorded (Core i9-14901KE) versus 38.4 GB/s (N150)
• ECC Memory: True (Core i9-14901KE) versus False (N150)
• PCIe: Gen 5, 16 Lanes (Core i9-14901KE) versus Gen 3, 9 Lanes (N150)
• Integrated Graphics: UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14901KE) versus UHD Graphics 730 (N150)
• Market Segment: Desktop (Core i9-14901KE) versus Mobile (N150)
• Release Date: June 30, 2024 (Core i9-14901KE) versus November 19, 2024 (N150)
• Multiplier Unlocked: True (Core i9-14901KE) versus False (N150)
• Part Number: Q49DSRNJC (Core i9-14901KE) versus SRPNR (N150)
• Percentile vs All CPUs: 50th (Core i9-14901KE) versus 28th (N150)
• Average Benchmark Score: 0 (Core i9-14901KE) versus 1025 (N150)

The process node is identical at 10 nm for both, and both are manufactured by Intel. Both processors have Active production status. The Core i9-14901KE has no recorded benchmarks, no launch MSRP, and no nearest rivals in the database, while the N150 has four Cinebench results and four nearest rivals with scores between 1024 and 1027. The N150’s release date comes approximately five months after the Core i9-14901KE’s launch, and its part number differs completely. The Core i9-14901KE’s L1 cache is smaller per core, but its L2 and L3 allocations are larger in total. The N150’s single-channel memory bus and lower PCIe generation reflect its mobile, low-power design.