Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core i9-14900F Comparison

Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core i9-14900F are both desktop processors on Intel Socket 1700, but they occupy very different positions in the database. The Core 5 213PTE is a Bartlett Lake part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i9-14900F is a Raptor Lake Refresh flagship with 24 cores and 32 threads. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap, with the i9-14900F winning all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons. However, the Core 5 213PTE still holds a respectable 83rd percentile ranking across all CPUs, indicating it is far from a weak entry.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows a clean sweep: the Intel Core i9-14900F wins every single benchmark in the comparison set. There are no tests where the Core 5 213PTE comes out ahead. The closest margin for the i9-14900F is in PassMark physics, where it leads by 24.1%, and PassMark find prime numbers, where it leads by 24.9%. These two tests are the most favorable for the Core 5 213PTE, suggesting its architecture handles these specific workloads relatively better than its overall average would imply.

The Core i9-14900F’s largest victories come in data-heavy tasks. It leads by 58.4% in PassMark data encryption, by 53.7% in data compression, and by 52.8% in random string sorting. These are workloads that scale strongly with core count and cache capacity, both of which favor the i9-14900F. In multi-threaded rendering, the i9-14900F consistently delivers around 45% higher scores across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore tests.

For the Core 5 213PTE, its role is defined by what it does not win rather than what it does. It has no benchmark wins, but its 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs indicates it is still a capable mainstream processor. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3718 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3070 show that for lightly threaded applications, it is not dramatically behind the i9-14900F, which scores 4506 and 5583 respectively in those same tests.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same manufacturing process node (10 nm) and both come from Intel’s foundry. They also use the same per-core cache configuration: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core. The critical architectural split is in core counts and shared L3 cache. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads with 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This difference in core count is the primary driver of the multicore performance gap.

The Core i9-14900F also has a larger die size at 257 mm², while the Core 5 213PTE does not have a recorded die size. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The Core 5 213PTE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core i9-14900F does not have a memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ significantly. The Core 5 213PTE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Core i9-14900F has no integrated graphics (N/A). This means the Core 5 213PTE can run a display without a discrete graphics card, while the Core i9-14900F requires one. The Core i9-14900F compensates with a higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz versus 5.20 GHz for the Core 5 213PTE, and its base clock is slightly lower at 2.00 GHz versus 2.10 GHz.

The Core i9-14900F is a Core 14th Gen part from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, while the Core 5 213PTE belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The Core 5 213PTE has a later release date of 2026-03-08, compared to the Core i9-14900F’s 2024-01-07. The Core i9-14900F has a locked multiplier, as does the Core 5 213PTE, meaning neither supports unlocked overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent pattern. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i9-14900F scores 3986 against 2192 for the Core 5 213PTE, a 45% delta. The single-core R15 test shows the same 45% delta, with scores of 562 and 309. Cinebench R20 multicore repeats this exact 45% gap: 16611 versus 9135. The same delta appears in R20 single-core (2344 versus 1289) and R23 multicore (39551 versus 21751). Cinebench R23 single-core also shows a 45% delta, with 5583 versus 3070.

The PassMark suite reveals larger disparities in specific workloads. Data encryption shows the widest gap: the Core i9-14900F scores 34644 versus 14413, a 58.4% lead. Data compression follows at 53.7%, with scores of 564207 and 261083. Random string sorting shows a 52.8% delta (63728 versus 30106). Extended instructions show a 48.1% delta (31084 versus 16146). Integer math shows a 47.4% delta (177066 versus 93109).

Floating point math shows a 40% delta, with the Core i9-14900F scoring 119550 versus 71722. PassMark multithread shows a 45% delta, consistent with the Cinebench multicore results, at 46532 versus 25590. The smallest gaps are in PassMark physics (2899 versus 2199, a 24.1% delta), PassMark find prime numbers (209 versus 157, a 24.9% delta), and PassMark single-thread (4506 versus 3718, a 17.5% delta). The single-thread results are notable because they show the Core i9-14900F’s advantage shrinks to under 20% when only one core is active, indicating the Core 5 213PTE’s per-core performance is relatively strong.

The average benchmark score reinforces the overall picture. The Core i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60008, while the Core 5 213PTE sits at 32924. This places the i9-14900F in the 92nd percentile versus all CPUs, compared to the 83rd percentile for the Core 5 213PTE. The nearest rivals for the Core i9-14900F include AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (delta -0.2%) and AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (delta -0.2%), while the Core 5 213PTE’s nearest rivals include Intel Core i7-12700 (delta -0.1%) and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (delta -0.5%).

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The Intel Core i9-14900F is the superior processor in every measured metric. Its 24 cores and 32 threads provide a massive advantage in multi-threaded workloads, and its higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz gives it an edge even in single-threaded tasks. The 45% deltas across the Cinebench suite and the PassMark multithread test indicate that for rendering, compilation, or any heavily parallel workload, the i9-14900F is the clear choice.

The Core 5 213PTE wins on efficiency and integration. It has a 45 W TDP versus 65 W for the Core i9-14900F, and it includes UHD Graphics 730, meaning it can function without a discrete GPU. Its single-thread performance, while 17.5% behind the i9-14900F in PassMark, is still strong enough for everyday desktop tasks and lightly threaded applications. The 83rd percentile ranking shows it is a competent mid-range processor.

Users who need maximum compute throughput, especially in data encryption, compression, or multithreaded rendering, should select the Core i9-14900F. Users who prioritize lower power consumption, require integrated graphics, or are building a system where the i9-14900F’s 24-core configuration is unnecessary can rely on the Core 5 213PTE. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 213PTE is $221, and for the Core i9-14900F it is $524.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much faster is the Core i9-14900F in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Core i9-14900F scores 39551 versus 21751 for the Core 5 213PTE, a 45% lead.

Q: Does the Core 5 213PTE have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 730. The Core i9-14900F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The smallest gap is in PassMark single-thread, where the Core i9-14900F leads by 17.5% (4506 versus 3718).

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core i9-14900F has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The Core 5 213PTE has a TDP of 45 W, and the Core i9-14900F has a TDP of 65 W.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core i9-14900F |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 24 |

| Threads | 16 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Die Size | N/A | 257 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | N/A |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | N/A |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $524 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | SA4QM | SRN3W |