Intel Core i7-4810MQ vs Intel Core i7-6700TE Comparison

The Intel Core i7-6700TE and Intel Core i7-4810MQ are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, but they represent different eras and design goals. The 6700TE is a 35W Skylake desktop part, while the 4810MQ is a 47W Haswell mobile processor. Benchmark results show a clear split: the 6700TE dominates Cinebench tests across the board, while the 4810MQ takes the Geekbench crown. The data reveals a nuanced picture where generation and power efficiency trade blows with raw clock speed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head data is the 6700TE’s near-sweep of the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 6700TE scores 531 against the 4810MQ’s 516, a 2.9% advantage. That edge holds steady in R20 multi-core (2214 vs. 2154, +2.8%) and R23 multi-core (5273 vs. 5129, +2.8%). The single-core Cinebench results follow the same script: R15 shows 74 vs. 72 (+2.8%), R20 shows 312 vs. 304 (+2.6%), and R23 shows 744 vs. 724 (+2.8%). The consistency of these deltas—hovering between 2.6% and 2.9%—suggests a fundamental architectural efficiency advantage for the Skylake part, not a workload-specific quirk.

The 4810MQ fights back in Geekbench, and it does so decisively. In Geekbench multi-core, it posts 3203 against the 6700TE’s 3154, a 1.5% win. The single-core gap is far wider: 1106 vs. 1028, a 7.1% margin that is the largest of any benchmark in this comparison. This is a substantial reversal, and it highlights that the 4810MQ’s higher base clock (2.80 GHz vs. 2.40 GHz) and boost clock (3.80 GHz vs. 3.40 GHz) can overcome the newer architecture in certain latency-sensitive or lightly-threaded workloads.

When tallying the overall wins, the 6700TE takes 6 of 8 benchmarks, with the 4810MQ claiming only the two Geekbench tests. The average benchmark scores reflect this split: the 6700TE sits at 1666, just ahead of the 4810MQ’s 1651. Both processors land in the 40th percentile of all CPUs, meaning they are statistically peers in aggregate performance, with the 6700TE holding a 0.9% average-score lead. The deltas are small in absolute terms, but the distribution of wins tells a clear story about which workloads favor which chip.

Where Each One Wins

The 6700TE is the clear choice for Cinebench-style rendering workloads. Its multi-core wins across R15, R20, and R23, ranging from 2.8% to 2.9%, indicate that the Skylake architecture extracts more work per clock in sustained, all-core rendering tasks. The single-core Cinebench results also favor the 6700TE, with deltas of 2.6% to 2.8%, which is notable given the 4810MQ’s higher clock speeds. This suggests that the 6700TE’s IPC (instructions per clock) advantage is real and measurable, not just theoretical. For anyone running Blender, Cinebench, or similar CPU-bound renderers, the 6700TE is the better performer.

The 4810MQ wins in Geekbench, and the single-core margin is substantial. A 7.1% lead in Geekbench single-core, combined with a 1.5% multi-core lead, points to scenarios where the 4810MQ’s raw clock speed dominates. Geekbench is known for its diverse workload mix, including cryptography, compression, and HTML5 parsing, which can be sensitive to clock frequency. The 4810MQ’s 3.80 GHz boost clock gives it a decisive edge in these bursty, single-threaded tasks. For general desktop responsiveness, office productivity, or legacy software that relies on high-frequency single-core performance, the 4810MQ has the advantage.

The two chips also differ in platform fit. The 6700TE uses Intel Socket 1151 and supports DDR4 memory with 34.1 GB/s bandwidth, while the 4810MQ uses Socket G3 and supports DDR3 with 25.6 GB/s bandwidth. The 6700TE’s memory bandwidth advantage could matter in memory-intensive applications, even if the benchmarks here don’t isolate that factor. The 4810MQ is a mobile part, drawing 47W TDP, while the 6700TE is a desktop part at 35W TDP. The lower TDP of the 6700TE, combined with its consistent Cinebench wins, makes it the more power-efficient performer in rendering tasks.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward recommendation: pick the Intel Core i7-6700TE for rendering and multi-threaded productivity. It wins every Cinebench test, both multi-core and single-core, with margins between 2.6% and 2.9%. Its 35W TDP, DDR4 support, and newer Skylake architecture make it the more modern and efficient choice. The 6700TE is also the only one of the two with an active production status, while the 4810MQ is end-of-life. If you are building a new system or upgrading a desktop platform, the 6700TE is the safer long-term bet.

Pick the Intel Core i7-4810MQ if your primary workloads match Geekbench’s profile. Its 7.1% single-core lead and 1.5% multi-core lead in that suite are too large to ignore for users who prioritize snappy, frequency-driven performance. The 4810MQ’s higher clock speeds (2.80 GHz base, 3.80 GHz boost) make it a strong pick for legacy software, light gaming, or any task that doesn’t scale across all eight threads. However, its 47W TDP is higher, and its DDR3 memory support limits platform bandwidth. The 4810MQ also carries a launch MSRP of $378, which you may note, but it is a discontinued part, so availability and platform fit will dictate whether it makes sense.

For the average user, the 6700TE is the more balanced recommendation. It wins more benchmarks, is more power-efficient, and is still in production. The 4810MQ is a niche pick for those who specifically need Geekbench-style performance and have a compatible Socket G3 motherboard. Neither chip is a performance king—both sit at the 40th percentile—but the 6700TE’s broader set of wins makes it the default choice from the data.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The Intel Core i7-6700TE wins 6 out of 8 head-to-head benchmarks, including all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests. The Intel Core i7-4810MQ wins the remaining 2 Geekbench tests.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest delta is in Geekbench single-core, where the 4810MQ scores 1106 against the 6700TE’s 1028, a 7.1% advantage. The next largest gap is 2.9% in Cinebench R15 multi-core, favoring the 6700TE.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The 6700TE has an average benchmark score of 1666, while the 4810MQ sits at 1651. This gives the 6700TE a 0.9% lead in aggregate performance, and both CPUs share the same 40th percentile ranking.

Q: Which CPU has better memory bandwidth?

A: The 6700TE supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s, while the 4810MQ supports DDR3 with 25.6 GB/s. The 6700TE’s bandwidth is roughly 33% higher.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The 6700TE is built on Intel’s 14 nm process, while the 4810MQ uses the older 22 nm node. The 4810MQ has a transistor count of 1,400 million and a die size of 177 mm², while those figures are not listed for the 6700TE.

Q: Which CPU has more L3 cache?

A: The 6700TE has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the 4810MQ has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The 6700TE uses the Skylake architecture on a 14 nm process node, while the 4810MQ uses Haswell on a 22 nm node. This generational leap gives the 6700TE a manufacturing advantage, as the smaller node allows for higher efficiency and lower power draw—its TDP is 35W versus the 4810MQ’s 47W. The 6700TE is a desktop part (Socket 1151), while the 4810MQ is a mobile part (Socket G3), which explains the TDP difference and the intended use cases.

Cache configurations differ in the shared L3 pool. The 6700TE has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the 4810MQ has 6 MB. Both have identical per-core L1 (64 KB) and L2 (256 KB) caches. The extra 2 MB of L3 in the 6700TE likely contributes to its Cinebench wins, as larger caches can reduce memory latency in multi-threaded workloads.

Memory support is another clear divergence. The 6700TE supports DDR4 with 34.1 GB/s of bandwidth, while the 4810MQ supports DDR3 with 25.6 GB/s. This is a substantial bandwidth gap that favors the 6700TE in memory-heavy tasks, even though the head-to-head benchmarks do not isolate memory performance. Both chips use dual-channel memory buses and PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Neither supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.

Integrated graphics also differ: the 6700TE includes HD Graphics 530, while the 4810MQ has Intel HD 4600. The 6700TE’s newer GPU architecture is a side benefit for systems without a discrete graphics card, though the benchmark data does not cover graphics performance. The 4810MQ’s launch MSRP of $378 is the only pricing information available; the 6700TE has no listed launch MSRP.