Intel Core i7-3770K vs Intel Core i7-4810MQ Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear split between these two processors. The Intel Core i7-3770K wins six of the eight recorded head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel Core i7-4810MQ takes the remaining two. However, the margins tell a more nuanced story than the raw win count.

In Cinebench workloads, the i7-3770K shows consistent dominance. The multicore results across all three Cinebench versions favor the desktop part by nearly identical margins. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-3770K scores 558 against 516 for the i7-4810MQ, an 8.1% advantage. The R20 multicore test shows 2327 versus 2154, an 8% delta. R23 multicore follows the same pattern: 5542 against 5129, again an 8.1% gap. These consistent margins indicate a structural advantage in sustained multi-threaded workloads rather than a test-specific anomaly.

Single-core Cinebench results reinforce the same conclusion. The i7-3770K leads by 8.3% in R15 single-core (78 versus 72), 7.9% in R20 single-core (328 versus 304), and 8% in R23 single-core (782 versus 724). Every Cinebench metric, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded, lands in the same 7.9% to 8.3% range. This uniformity suggests the i7-3770K's higher base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz, compared to the i7-4810MQ's 2.80 GHz base and 3.80 GHz boost, translate directly into Cinebench performance.

The Geekbench results flip the script entirely. In Geekbench multicore, the i7-4810MQ scores 3203 against 3027 for the i7-3770K, a 5.5% advantage for the mobile chip. The single-core Geekbench gap is even larger: 1106 versus 860, a 22.2% margin in favor of the i7-4810MQ. This is a dramatic reversal. The same processor that trails by roughly 8% in every Cinebench test leads by more than a fifth in Geekbench single-core.

The average benchmark scores reflect this split. The i7-3770K posts an average benchmark score of 1688, while the i7-4810MQ sits at 1651. Both processors occupy the 40th percentile among all CPUs in the database, placing them in the same overall performance tier despite their divergent workload-specific results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-3770K records an average benchmark score of 1688, compared to 1651 for the Intel Core i7-4810MQ. The i7-3770K also matches its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-5850HQ, at 1688 with a 0% delta, while the i7-4810MQ trails its closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, by 0.1%.

Q: How large is the Cinebench R23 multicore gap?

A: The i7-3770K scores 5542 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the i7-4810MQ scores 5129. This represents an 8.1% advantage for the desktop processor, consistent with the 8% and 8.1% deltas seen in R20 and R15 multicore tests respectively.

Q: Why does the i7-4810MQ win Geekbench by such a large margin?

A: In Geekbench single-core, the i7-4810MQ scores 1106 against 860 for the i7-3770K, a 22.2% lead. The multicore Geekbench result shows 3203 versus 3027, a 5.5% advantage. The data does not explain the cause, but the magnitude of the single-core gap suggests the i7-4810MQ's architecture handles Geekbench workloads differently than Cinebench.

Q: Do both processors share the same process node?

A: Yes. Both the i7-3770K and the i7-4810MQ are built on Intel's 22 nm process node and contain 1,400 million transistors. The die sizes differ slightly, with the i7-3770K at 160 mm² and the i7-4810MQ at 177 mm².

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The i7-3770K has a TDP of 77 watts, while the i7-4810MQ has a TDP of 47 watts. The mobile processor draws substantially less power despite delivering competitive benchmark results in several tests.

Q: How do these processors compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The i7-3770K sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (1690, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-980 (1693, -0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i5-4690K (1682, 0.3% delta). The i7-4810MQ sits within 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-5675R (1648, 0.2% delta), the Intel Core i5-4670K (1656, -0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i7-5700HQ (1645, 0.4% delta). Both processors are effectively tied with their respective competitor groups.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core i7-3770K is the stronger processor for Cinebench-based workloads, while the Intel Core i7-4810MQ holds a decisive edge in Geekbench. The i7-3770K wins six of eight head-to-head benchmarks, but the two Geekbench losses are not marginal. The 22.2% single-core Geekbench deficit is the largest margin in any test, and the 5.5% multicore Geekbench gap is also substantial.

For users running Cinebench R15, R20, or R23, the i7-3770K delivers a reliable 8% improvement across every version and thread count. This consistency makes it the predictable choice for rendering and multi-threaded content creation tasks. The i7-4810MQ, however, demonstrates superior Geekbench performance, particularly in single-core tests where it leads by more than a fifth. This suggests the mobile chip excels in applications that mirror Geekbench's workload characteristics.

Both processors share the 40th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores differ by only 37 points out of roughly 1,650 to 1,690. Neither chip is dramatically faster overall. The i7-3770K's higher TDP of 77 watts versus 47 watts for the i7-4810MQ also factors into platform selection, as the desktop part requires more substantial cooling and power delivery.

The verdict depends entirely on workload. Cinebench users should choose the i7-3770K. Geekbench-sensitive workflows favor the i7-4810MQ. For general-purpose computing, the average scores indicate near-parity, with the i7-3770K holding a slim 2.2% average advantage.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The i7-3770K has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, while the i7-4810MQ operates at 2.80 GHz base and 3.80 GHz boost. The i7-3770K carries a TDP of 77 watts compared to 47 watts for the i7-4810MQ.

The sockets are incompatible. The i7-3770K uses Intel Socket 1155, while the i7-4810MQ uses Intel Socket G3. The i7-3770K is a desktop processor with an unlocked multiplier, whereas the i7-4810MQ is a mobile processor with a locked multiplier. The i7-3770K launched with an MSRP of $313, while the i7-4810MQ launched at $378.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The i7-3770K includes Intel HD 4000 graphics, while the i7-4810MQ features Intel HD 4600. The i7-3770K was released on 2012-04-28, and the i7-4810MQ followed on 2014-01-19. Both processors are end-of-life in production status.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is notable. The i7-3770K uses the Ivy Bridge architecture, while the i7-4810MQ uses Haswell. Both are built on Intel's 22 nm process node and contain 1,400 million transistors, but the die sizes differ: 160 mm² for the i7-3770K and 177 mm² for the i7-4810MQ.

The cache configurations diverge in the L3 tier. The i7-3770K has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-4810MQ has 6 MB shared. Both processors feature 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core. The core and thread counts are identical at 4 cores and 8 threads.

Memory support matches: both use DDR3 with a dual-channel memory bus and 25.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory. Both CPUs provide PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The i7-3770K is part of the Core i7 (Ivy Bridge) generation, and the i7-4810MQ belongs to the Core i7 (Haswell) generation.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-3770K wins in every Cinebench test category. This includes Cinebench R15 multicore (558 versus 516, 8.1% ahead), R15 single-core (78 versus 72, 8.3% ahead), R20 multicore (2327 versus 2154, 8% ahead), R20 single-core (328 versus 304, 7.9% ahead), R23 multicore (5542 versus 5129, 8.1% ahead), and R23 single-core (782 versus 724, 8% ahead). The i7-3770K also holds the higher average benchmark score at 1688 versus 1651.

The i7-4810MQ wins in Geekbench. The single-core result is particularly dominant: 1106 versus 860, a 22.2% advantage. The multicore Geekbench result also favors the mobile chip at 3203 versus 3027, a 5.5% margin. The i7-4810MQ achieves these wins while drawing 30 watts less power (47 watts versus 77 watts TDP).

The use-case split is clear. For Cinebench-style rendering workloads, the i7-3770K offers a consistent 8% performance advantage. For Geekbench-style tasks, especially single-threaded ones, the i7-4810MQ provides a substantial edge. The i7-4810MQ's lower power draw makes it suitable for mobile platforms, while the i7-3770K's unlocked multiplier offers overclocking potential for desktop enthusiasts. The i7-3770K's larger 8 MB L3 cache versus 6 MB may contribute to its Cinebench lead, while the i7-4810MQ's newer Haswell architecture appears to benefit Geekbench performance despite the lower clock speeds.