Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Intel Core i7-14701TE and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H represent two distinct approaches to processing, one a desktop-focused Raptor Lake Refresh part and the other a mobile Panther Lake processor. The benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy between the two, with the Core Ultra 5 336H dominating in nearly every measured workload. The Core i7-14701TE does claim a single victory, but the overall average benchmark score of 34485 for the Ultra 5 against 26013 for the i7-14701TE establishes a substantial gap in general capability.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head results is the consistency of the Core Ultra 5 336H's advantage. Across all three Cinebench versions, the Ultra 5 wins both single-core and multi-core tests by the same margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ultra 5 scores 23991 against 17035 for the i7-14701TE, a 29% difference. The single-core result in R23 shows 3387 versus 2405, also 29% in favor of the Ultra 5. This uniform delta repeats in Cinebench R15 and R20, where both multi-core and single-core tests show a 29% edge for the Ultra 5.

The Passmark suite reveals where the Ultra 5's strengths are most pronounced. Data encryption shows the largest gap, with the Ultra 5 scoring 21291 against 11699 for the i7-14701TE, a 45.1% advantage. Prime number finding follows closely, with the Ultra 5 at 299 versus 143, a 52.2% lead. Extended instructions show a 41.5% difference, with scores of 24542 and 14354 respectively. Floating point math performance favors the Ultra 5 by 39.1%, scoring 82415 against 50219.

Other Passmark workloads continue the pattern. Random string sorting gives the Ultra 5 a 33.8% lead, 34402 versus 22760. Single-thread performance shows a 34.3% gap, with 4013 against 2637. The multithread score favors the Ultra 5 by 29.8%, 28545 versus 20042, while physics performance shows a 30.6% difference, 2682 against 1860. Data compression is closer but still clearly in favor of the Ultra 5, 280340 versus 220520, a 21.3% margin.

The i7-14701TE's only win comes in Passmark integer math, where it scores 65792 against 62070, a 6% advantage. This single victory does little to offset the broader trend. The Ultra 5 wins 16 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, and its average benchmark score of 34485 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The i7-14701TE sits at the 78th percentile with its average of 26013.

The nearest rival data confirms the positioning of each part. The i7-14701TE competes with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, which has an average score of 25981, putting the Intel part 0.1% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS sits 0.4% above it at 26106. The Ultra 5, by contrast, trades blows with the Intel Core i7-13700HX, which averages 34554, placing the Ultra 5 0.2% behind that part. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is 0.7% above the Ultra 5, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is 0.8% above.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 3387 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE scores 2405, a 29% advantage for the Ultra 5.

Q: Does the Core i7-14701TE win any benchmark comparisons?

A: Yes, the i7-14701TE wins Passmark integer math with a score of 65792, which is 6% higher than the Ultra 5's 62070.

Q: How do the two processors compare in data encryption performance?

A: The Ultra 5 336H scores 21291 in Passmark data encryption, which is 45.1% higher than the i7-14701TE's 11699.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H has an average benchmark score of 34485, and the Core i7-14701TE has an average of 26013.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H ranks in the 84th percentile, while the Core i7-14701TE ranks in the 78th percentile.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 336H compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700HX?

A: The Ultra 5 336H has an average score of 34485, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-13700HX's average score of 34554.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and manufacturing nodes. The Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture on a 3 nm process node, with no die size recorded. It has 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning it relies on more physical cores rather than hyper-threading to reach its thread count.

Cache organization differs significantly. The i7-14701TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 5 336H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7-14701TE offers much more L3 cache, while the Ultra 5 provides larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations.

Memory support also separates the two. The i7-14701TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, and it supports ECC memory. The Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, but it does not support ECC. The integrated graphics differ as well, with the i7-14701TE using UHD Graphics 770 and the Ultra 5 336H using Intel Xe3 Graphics.

Both processors use PCIe Gen 5, but with different lane counts. The i7-14701TE provides 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 5 336H provides 12 lanes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The manufacturing foundry is Intel for both parts.

Specification Differences

The Core i7-14701TE and Core Ultra 5 336H differ across nearly every major specification field. Core counts show 8 cores for the i7-14701TE against 16 cores for the Ultra 5, while both have 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz for the i7-14701TE and 1.90 GHz for the Ultra 5. Boost clocks reverse the order, with the i7-14701TE reaching 5.20 GHz and the Ultra 5 reaching 4.60 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25 watts. Socket types are incompatible, with the i7-14701TE using Intel Socket 1700 and the Ultra 5 using Intel BGA 2540. The market segments differ, with the i7-14701TE listed as Desktop and the Ultra 5 listed as Mobile.

The process nodes are 10 nm for the i7-14701TE and 3 nm for the Ultra 5. The i7-14701TE has a die size of 257 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Ultra 5. The L3 cache differs, with 33 MB shared on the i7-14701TE and 18 MB shared on the Ultra 5. Memory support shows DDR4 and DDR5 for the i7-14701TE, while the Ultra 5 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. ECC support is present on the i7-14701TE but absent on the Ultra 5. PCIe lanes number 16 for the i7-14701TE and 12 for the Ultra 5. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for the i7-14701TE and Intel Xe3 Graphics for the Ultra 5. The release dates place the i7-14701TE in 2024 and the Ultra 5 336H in 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 336H is the dominant performer in almost every category measured. It wins all Cinebench tests, both single-core and multi-core, across R15, R20, and R23. It also wins Passmark tests for data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. This broad coverage makes it the stronger choice for rendering, encryption workloads, scientific calculations, and general productivity tasks.

The Core i7-14701TE holds a single win in Passmark integer math, with a 6% advantage over the Ultra 5. This suggests workloads that rely heavily on integer operations, such as certain database or financial calculations, may see a slight benefit from the i7-14701TE. The i7-14701TE also offers 33 MB of L3 cache compared to 18 MB on the Ultra 5, which could matter for applications that depend on large cached datasets. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock is higher than the Ultra 5's 4.60 GHz, and it supports ECC memory, which the Ultra 5 does not.

The platform differences also define where each processor fits. The i7-14701TE is a desktop part on Socket 1700 with 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the Ultra 5 is a mobile part on BGA 2540 with 12 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The i7-14701TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Ultra 5's lower TDP of 25 watts versus 45 watts gives it an efficiency advantage for mobile systems.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H for overall performance. Its 84th percentile ranking, average score of 34485, and wins in 16 of 17 head-to-head comparisons position it as the stronger processor for most workloads. The 29% advantage across all Cinebench tests, combined with large leads in encryption, prime finding, and floating point math, makes it the better option for compute-heavy tasks.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE remains relevant for specific scenarios. Its 6% win in integer math, higher L3 cache of 33 MB, support for ECC memory, and higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz give it distinct advantages for certain server or workstation tasks. Its 78th percentile ranking and average score of 26013 place it in a lower performance tier, but the desktop platform with 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR4 support offers flexibility for systems that need those features.

The Core Ultra 5 336H should be the selection for users prioritizing raw processing power, particularly in mobile or power-constrained environments where its 25 watt TDP is an asset. The Core i7-14701TE suits desktop builds that require ECC memory support or need the larger shared L3 cache, and its single integer math victory shows it retains a niche for integer-focused workloads. The data does not support choosing the i7-14701TE for general performance, as the Ultra 5 leads by margins ranging from 21.3% to 52.2% across most Passmark tests and by 29% across all Cinebench tests.