Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235H Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance difference between the Intel Core i7-14701TE and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H?

A: The database shows a decisive advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H. Its average benchmark score is 37522, compared to 26013 for the Core i7-14701TE. The Core Ultra 5 235H also holds the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the Core i7-14701TE sits at the 78th percentile.

Q: How large is the single-core performance gap?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core Ultra 5 235H scores 3613 against 2405 for the Core i7-14701TE, a 33.4% advantage. PassMark single-thread testing shows a similar pattern: 4359 versus 2637, a 39.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H.

Q: Which processor wins in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235H wins all multi-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 25598 versus 17035 for the Core i7-14701TE, a 33.5% difference. PassMark multithread results show 30091 against 20042, also a 33.4% gap.

Q: Are there any benchmark categories where the Core i7-14701TE is competitive?

A: The closest result is PassMark physics, where the Core Ultra 5 235H scores 1985 versus 1860 for the Core i7-14701TE, a relatively modest 6.3% difference. The next smallest gap is PassMark integer math, with the Core Ultra 5 235H leading by 11.4% (74247 versus 65792).

Q: What are the core and thread configurations for each processor?

A: The Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Core Ultra 5 235H has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it has more physical cores but no hyper-threading, so its thread count equals its core count.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Core i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 235H features Arc Graphics 140T. The database does not include separate graphics benchmarks, so no direct performance comparison is available from the recorded data.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear and consistent winner: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H. It wins all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons in the database. The Core i7-14701TE does not claim a single victory in any test category.

For workloads that depend heavily on single-thread speed, such as general desktop responsiveness or lightly threaded applications, the Core Ultra 5 235H offers a substantial advantage. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3613 is 50.2% higher than the Core i7-14701TE's 2405. PassMark single-thread results reinforce this, with a 39.5% lead.

For multi-threaded productivity, the Core Ultra 5 235H again dominates. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25598 exceeds the Core i7-14701TE's 17035 by 50.2%. The PassMark multithread score of 30091 versus 20042 represents a 50.1% improvement. These are large margins that translate into real time savings for rendering, compilation, or data processing tasks.

The Core i7-14701TE remains relevant only in specific contexts. Its 45W TDP is higher than the Core Ultra 5 235H's 28W, yet it still loses every benchmark, which makes it difficult to recommend for any performance-oriented use case. The only area where the Core i7-14701TE shows comparative strength is the PassMark physics test, where the gap narrows to 6.3%, but even there the Core Ultra 5 235H comes out ahead.

The Core Ultra 5 235H also sits in a higher performance tier according to the database. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-13900HK, which it matches within 0.3%. The Core i7-14701TE's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, which it edges by 0.1%. This places the Core Ultra 5 235H in competition with higher-end processors, while the Core i7-14701TE aligns with mid-range parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows uniform results across all versions. In Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multi-core tests show the Core Ultra 5 235H leading by roughly 33.4% to 33.5%. For example, Cinebench R15 multi-core scores are 2580 versus 1716, while single-core is 364 versus 242. The consistency across generations of the Cinebench test indicates the performance gap is not workload-specific but reflects a fundamental architectural advantage.

The PassMark data encryption test shows the largest relative difference. The Core Ultra 5 235H scores 23121 versus 11699 for the Core i7-14701TE, a 49.4% gap. This suggests the newer architecture handles encryption workloads with significantly greater efficiency.

Floating-point math also shows a wide separation. The Core Ultra 5 235H scores 93509, which is 46.3% ahead of the Core i7-14701TE's 50219. Extended instructions follow a similar pattern, with the Core Ultra 5 235H leading by 38.5% (23354 versus 14354).

Random string sorting shows a 37.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H, with scores of 36208 and 22760. Prime number finding shows a 40.2% gap (239 versus 143). Data compression is closer but still favors the Core Ultra 5 235H by 27% (301979 versus 220520).

The smallest margins appear in physics and integer math. PassMark physics shows 1985 versus 1860, a 6.3% difference. Integer math shows 74247 versus 65792, an 11.4% gap. These are the only tests where the Core i7-14701TE stays within single-digit or low-double-digit percentage range, though it still loses both.

Specification Differences

The socket types differ completely. The Core i7-14701TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Intel BGA 2049. This means the Core Ultra 5 235H is soldered to the motherboard, while the Core i7-14701TE is a socketed desktop part.

Thermal design power shows a notable difference. The Core i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45W, while the Core Ultra 5 235H has a TDP of 28W. The lower TDP of the Core Ultra 5 235H is notable given its higher performance across all benchmarks.

The base clocks are 2.10 GHz for the Core i7-14701TE and 2.40 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 235H. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz for the Core i7-14701TE and 5.00 GHz for the Core Ultra 5 235H. The Core i7-14701TE has a higher boost clock, yet the Core Ultra 5 235H still wins every single-threaded test.

Memory support differs in scope. The Core i7-14701TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 235H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Core Ultra 5 235H also lists a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, a figure not provided for the Core i7-14701TE. ECC memory is supported on the Core i7-14701TE but not on the Core Ultra 5 235H.

PCIe lanes differ as well. The Core i7-14701TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 235H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Architecture Differences

The Core i7-14701TE belongs to the 14th Gen Core series, built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) using a 10 nm process from Intel. The Core Ultra 5 235H belongs to Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-H codename) using a 3 nm process from TSMC. The process node difference is substantial, with the Core Ultra 5 235H using a more advanced fabrication technology.

Core counts differ significantly. The Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads with hyper-threading. The Core Ultra 5 235H has 14 cores and 14 threads without hyper-threading. Despite having fewer threads, the Core Ultra 5 235H wins all multi-threaded tests, indicating its additional physical cores and architectural efficiency overcome the thread count disadvantage.

Cache hierarchies show different designs. The Core i7-14701TE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 235H has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 235H has larger per-core caches but a smaller shared L3 pool. The die size for the Core i7-14701TE is 257 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core Ultra 5 235H.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arc Graphics 140T. The Arc branding indicates a newer graphics architecture from Intel.

Market segments differ. The Core i7-14701TE is classified as a desktop processor, while the Core Ultra 5 235H is classified as mobile. This aligns with their socket types and form factors.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 235H wins every recorded benchmark, so the use-case split is straightforward. For any workload represented in the database, the Core Ultra 5 235H is the faster processor.

The Core i7-14701TE's closest performance shows up in the PassMark physics test, where it trails by only 6.3%. This suggests that in physics simulation or similar game-physics workloads, the performance gap narrows considerably. The integer math test also shows a relatively smaller gap of 11.4%, indicating that general integer arithmetic tasks are less one-sided.

For tasks involving data encryption, the Core Ultra 5 235H has the largest advantage at 49.4%. This makes it the clear choice for security-sensitive workloads or encrypted storage operations. Floating-point math also shows a 46.3% lead, favoring the Core Ultra 5 235H for scientific computing or 3D rendering tasks.

Single-threaded performance favors the Core Ultra 5 235H by margins between 33.4% and 39.5% depending on the test. This covers everyday applications, web browsing, and office productivity, where the Core Ultra 5 235H will feel noticeably faster.

Multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, compilation, and batch processing show a 33.4% to 33.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H in Cinebench tests and a 50.1% advantage in PassMark multithread. The Core Ultra 5 235H's 14 physical cores provide a solid foundation for parallel workloads.

The Core i7-14701TE, despite its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz and larger 33 MB L3 cache, cannot overcome the architectural advantages of the Core Ultra 5 235H. Its only potential advantage lies in contexts not covered by the recorded benchmarks, such as ECC memory support, which the Core Ultra 5 235H lacks. For environments requiring ECC memory, the Core i7-14701TE is the only option between these two processors.