Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive outcome: the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F wins all 17 recorded comparisons, with no victories for the Intel Core i7-14701E. The magnitude of the margin varies significantly across workloads, ranging from a modest 9.4% advantage in single-threaded tests to a dominant 64.4% lead in floating-point math.

Starting with the Cinebench suite, the Core Ultra 7 265F delivers substantial multi-core gains. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ultra 7 scores 41,980 compared to the i7-14701E's 22,195, a 47.1% difference. The same 47.1% delta appears across Cinebench R15 multi-core (4,231 vs 2,237), R20 multi-core (17,631 vs 9,321), and R23 single-core (5,926 vs 3,133). Single-core performance in Cinebench R15 shows a 47.2% gap (597 vs 315), while R20 single-core sits at 47.1% (2,488 vs 1,315). These consistent deltas indicate the Ultra 7's architectural advantage scales evenly across the rendering benchmark family.

PassMark results reveal where the two processors diverge most sharply. The largest single delta appears in floating-point math, where the Ultra 7 scores 173,855 against 61,873 for the i7-14701E, a 64.4% lead. Data encryption shows a 62.3% gap (39,468 vs 14,862), and prime number finding follows at 57.7% (416 vs 176). Random string sorting favors the Ultra 7 by 53.3% (62,439 vs 29,158), while extended instructions show a 52.8% delta (39,235 vs 18,528).

The narrowest margin occurs in PassMark single-thread testing, where the Ultra 7's 4,750 score beats the i7-14701E's 4,305 by just 9.4%. This same 9.4% delta appears in the duplicate singlethread entry. Physics performance shows a 24.4% gap (3,172 vs 2,399), the second-smallest margin. Integer math trails at 41.1% (138,078 vs 81,325), and multithread testing shows 47.2% (49,410 vs 26,112). Data compression completes the picture with a 44.2% delta (507,018 vs 282,939).

The overall average benchmark score confirms the hierarchy: the Ultra 7 265F averages 64,438 points, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the i7-14701E averages 33,206 points, sitting in the 83rd percentile. The Ultra 7's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (0.3% higher average score), the AMD EPYC 7343 (0.4% lower), the AMD EPYC 4464P (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS (0.6% lower). The i7-14701E sits near the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (0.0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (0.1% higher), AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (0.3% lower), and Intel Core i7-13650HX (0.4% lower).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and use entirely different manufacturing approaches. The Intel Core i7-14701E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The Core Ultra 7 265F is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename. This chip uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC, featuring 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Core configuration differs fundamentally. The i7-14701E provides 8 cores and 16 threads, meaning it uses Hyper-Threading. The Ultra 7 265F offers 20 cores and 20 threads, indicating no simultaneous multithreading. This core count advantage, combined with the newer process node, explains much of the performance gap.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The i7-14701E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7 265F increases each level: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. Despite the Ultra 7's smaller total L3, its larger per-core L1 and L2 caches provide quicker access to frequently used data.

Memory support shows a clear generational split. The i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The Ultra 7 265F supports only DDR5, also dual-channel, with a rated memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and no ECC support. PCIe connectivity increases from Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the i7-14701E to Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the Ultra 7.

Integrated graphics differ significantly. The i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). This means the Ultra 7 requires a discrete GPU for any display output. Both processors use different sockets: the i7-14701E fits Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 7 265F requires Intel Socket 1851. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The i7-14701E was released on 2024-06-30, whereas the Ultra 7 265F arrived later on 2025-01-06, with a launch MSRP of $379. Both remain in active production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ultra 7 also uses a 3 nm TSMC process node compared to the i7's 10 nm Intel node.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ultra 7 265F scores 41,980 versus 22,195 for the i7-14701E, a 47.1% difference. PassMark multithread shows a similar 47.2% gap (49,410 vs 26,112). The largest multi-core delta appears in floating-point math at 64.4%.

Q: Does the i7-14701E win any benchmark?

A: No. The recorded data shows the Ultra 7 265F winning all 17 head-to-head comparisons. The closest result is PassMark single-thread, where the Ultra 7 leads by only 9.4% (4,750 vs 4,305).

Q: What are the memory support differences?

A: The i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode with ECC memory. The Ultra 7 265F supports only DDR5, also dual-channel, with a rated bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and no ECC support.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics (N/A). The Ultra 7 requires a separate graphics card for video output.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Ultra 7 265F averages 64,438 points and ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The i7-14701E averages 33,206 points and ranks in the 83rd percentile. The Ultra 7's average score is roughly 94% higher than the i7's.

The Verdict

The data makes the choice straightforward for users prioritizing raw performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F dominates every measured workload, with margins ranging from 9.4% in single-threaded PassMark tests to 64.4% in floating-point math. Its 20-core configuration, 3 nm TSMC process, and larger per-core caches translate into consistent advantages across rendering, encryption, compression, and physics simulations. The 93rd percentile ranking versus the i7-14701E's 83rd percentile confirms this processor sits in a higher performance class entirely.

The Intel Core i7-14701E retains relevance in specific scenarios. Its support for DDR4 memory allows builds to reuse existing memory kits, and ECC memory support suits reliability-focused configurations. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output without a discrete GPU, which the Ultra 7 cannot offer. Its lower average score of 33,206 places it near the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and Ryzen 7 7745HX, indicating competitive standing within its own generation.

For multi-threaded productivity, content creation, or data-heavy workloads, the Ultra 7 265F is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. The 47.1% Cinebench R23 multi-core advantage alone justifies its selection for rendering tasks. For single-thread responsiveness, the Ultra 7's 9.4% PassMark lead, while smaller, still favors the newer processor. The i7-14701E only becomes preferable when its DDR4 support, ECC capability, or integrated graphics align with specific build requirements. The socket difference also matters: Intel Socket 1700 for the i7-14701E versus Intel Socket 1851 for the Ultra 7, meaning motherboard choice follows directly from processor selection.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-14701E | Intel Core Ultra 7 265F |

|---------------|----------------------|------------------------|

| Series | Core 14th Gen | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Cores | 8 | 20 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Arrow Lake-S |

| Generation | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not specified | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | N/A |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2025-01-06 |

| Launch MSRP | Not specified | $379 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | Q49FSRNJK | SRQCV |

| Average Benchmark Score | 33,206 | 64,438 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 83 | 93 |