Intel Core i7-14700T vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear split between these two Intel Core i7 parts, with the 14700T winning 13 of the 17 recorded comparisons, while the 14701E takes 4. The most decisive victories belong to the 14700T. In PassMark data encryption, it leads by 43.2%, scoring 21277 against 14862. Integer math shows a 40% advantage, with scores of 113854 versus 81325. Random string sorting favors the 14700T by 32.2% (38546 vs 29158), and floating point math sees a 27.7% lead (79042 vs 61873).

Cinebench results are consistent across all versions. The 14700T leads by 17% in R15 multicore (2618 vs 2237), 17.1% in R15 singlecore (369 vs 315), 17.1% in R20 multicore (10911 vs 9321), 17.1% in R20 singlecore (1540 vs 1315), 17.1% in R23 multicore (25980 vs 22195), and 17% in R23 singlecore (3667 vs 3133). The PassMark multithread test follows the same pattern, with the 14700T ahead by 17.1% (30571 vs 26112).

The 14701E wins in fewer tests, but its victories are notable. PassMark single thread shows a 9.3% advantage (4305 vs 3905). PassMark physics delivers the largest margin for the 14701E at 18.9%, scoring 2399 versus 1946. PassMark find prime numbers also goes to the 14701E, with a 17.6% lead (176 vs 145). The data compression test shows the 14700T ahead by 25.2% (354216 vs 282939), while extended instructions see a smaller 8.2% gap (20052 vs 18528).

The overall average benchmark score places the 14700T at 41914, compared to 33206 for the 14701E. The 14700T sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the 14701E ranks at the 83rd percentile. The nearest rivals for the 14700T include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (average score 41963, delta -0.1%) and the Intel Core i7-12850HX (average score 41779, delta 0.3%). The 14701E sits close to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201, delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244, delta -0.1%).

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental architecture. They are built on the Raptor Lake design with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series from Intel. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel, and the die size is 257 mm². Both use the Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is supported on both, and each integrates UHD Graphics 770. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The core configuration separates them. The 14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the 14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. This explains the multicore performance gap: the 14700T has 12 more cores and 12 more threads, which directly drives the 17.1% advantage in Cinebench R20 multicore and the 17% lead in R15 and R23 multicore tests.

Clock speeds differ in both directions. The 14700T has a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 14701E has a higher base clock of 2.60 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The 14701E's higher clocks contribute to its wins in single-threaded and physics tests, despite having fewer cores. The 14700T compensates with its core count in multithreaded workloads.

Thermal design power shows a significant split. The 14700T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the 14701E has a TDP of 65 watts. The 14701E consumes more power, which aligns with its higher clock speeds. The 14700T's lower TDP suggests it is designed for efficiency, yet it still outperforms in most benchmarks.

Cache hierarchies are identical. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. Neither has 3D V-Cache. The memory bandwidth field is not recorded for either part, so no comparison is possible there.

The release dates differ. The 14700T was released on January 7, 2024, while the 14701E came later on June 30, 2024. The 14700T has a launch MSRP of $384, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the 14701E. Both have locked multipliers, meaning they cannot be overclocked. The part numbers are SRN41 for the 14700T and Q49FSRNJK for the 14701E. Production status is Active for both.

Where Each One Wins

The 14700T dominates in workloads that scale with core count and parallel throughput. Data encryption shows the largest gap at 43.2%, indicating strong performance in cryptographic tasks. Integer math, a common proxy for general computational work, favors the 14700T by 40%. Random string sorting, which exercises memory access patterns and thread scheduling, sees a 32.2% advantage. Floating point math, relevant for scientific and engineering calculations, shows a 27.7% lead. Data compression is another win, with the 14700T ahead by 25.2%.

The 14700T also wins every Cinebench test, both multicore and singlecore. The singlecore Cinebench wins are interesting because the 14701E has a higher boost clock. The 14700T still leads by 17% to 17.1% in these tests, suggesting that its core architecture or thermal management delivers better per-thread results in this specific benchmark suite.

The 14701E wins in a narrower set of tasks. PassMark find prime numbers shows a 17.6% advantage, which may reflect the higher base clock and boost clock of the 14701E. PassMark physics delivers an 18.9% lead, indicating that the 14701E handles physics simulation more efficiently. PassMark single thread shows a 9.3% advantage, confirming that the 14701E has superior single-threaded performance in this test.

The pattern is clear: the 14701E wins where raw clock speed matters most, while the 14700T wins where core count and thread parallelism dominate. For users running heavily threaded applications, the 14700T is the stronger choice. For tasks that depend on single-threaded speed or specific physics calculations, the 14701E has an edge.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads. The Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the base clock difference between the two?

A: The 14700T has a base clock of 1.30 GHz, while the 14701E has a base clock of 2.60 GHz. The 14701E has a higher base clock by 1.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The 14700T wins with a score of 25980, compared to 22195 for the 14701E. The delta is 17.1% in favor of the 14700T.

Q: How do the processors compare in PassMark single thread?

A: The 14701E wins with a score of 4305, while the 14700T scores 3905. The 14701E leads by 9.3%.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Both also support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The 14700T has a TDP of 35 watts. The 14701E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-14700T | Intel Core i7-14701E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 20 | 8 |

| Threads | 28 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 1.30 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $384 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRN41 | Q49FSRNJK |

All other recorded specifications are identical: architecture (Raptor Lake), codename (Raptor Lake-R), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), die size (257 mm²), L1 cache (80 KB per core), L2 cache (2 MB per core), L3 cache (33 MB shared), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC memory (true), PCIe (Gen 5, 16 lanes), integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), socket (Intel Socket 1700), and multiplier unlocked (false).

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates a clear overall winner in the Intel Core i7-14700T. It holds a 41914 average benchmark score versus 33206 for the 14701E, and it wins 13 of 17 head-to-head tests. The 14700T is the better choice for multithreaded workloads, including data encryption, integer math, floating point math, and all Cinebench tests. Its 20 cores and 28 threads provide a substantial advantage over the 8 cores and 16 threads of the 14701E.

The 14701E has specific strengths. Its higher base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz deliver wins in PassMark single thread, physics, and find prime numbers. Users who prioritize single-threaded performance or specific physics-heavy tasks may prefer the 14701E. However, the 14701E loses in every Cinebench test, including singlecore, which undermines its clock speed advantage in that benchmark suite.

The 14700T also operates at a lower TDP of 35 watts, compared to 65 watts for the 14701E. This means the 14700T achieves higher performance in most tests while consuming less power. The 14701E has a higher TDP and still loses the majority of benchmarks.

For general desktop use, the data supports the 14700T. It ranks at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the 14701E ranks at the 83rd percentile. The 14700T also has a recorded launch MSRP of $384, while no MSRP is available for the 14701E. The 14701E may be suitable for niche applications that rely on its specific wins, but the 14700T is the stronger all-around processor based on the recorded measurements.