Intel Core i7-14700 vs Intel Core i9-13900F Comparison

The benchmark data is unequivocal: the Intel Core i9-13900F outperforms the Intel Core i7-14700 in every single head-to-head test recorded, securing 19 wins out of 19 comparisons. The i7-14700, despite being from a newer generation, does not claim a single victory in any of the tested workloads. This dominance is reflected in their overall standing, with both processors sitting at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, but the i9-13900F holds a higher average benchmark score of 51,730 compared to the i7-14700's 52,301, a difference that places the i9 slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in its nearest rival list while the i7 trails it by a small margin.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation occurs in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the i9-13900F scores 40,928 against the i7-14700's 28,398, a commanding 30.6% lead. This is the largest delta in any multi-threaded test, and it highlights a core-count advantage that the i7 cannot overcome. The single-core Cinebench R23 result is even more lopsided proportionally, with the i9-13900F hitting 5,778 versus the i7's 2,080, a staggering 64% gap. That specific result is an outlier in magnitude, but the pattern holds across the board; in Cinebench R20 single-core, the i9 leads by 16.3% with a score of 2,426 against 2,031.

Moving to Geekbench, the i9-13900F maintains its edge but by a narrower margin. In multi-core, it scores 19,680 versus 17,087, a 13.2% advantage, while single-core shows a modest 4.9% lead at 2,533 versus 2,409. These results suggest that while the i9 is faster in both scenarios, the single-core gap is less pronounced in this benchmark suite. The PassMark suite reinforces the i9's superiority across varied workloads: data compression shows a 21.6% lead (635,147 vs 498,198), and data encryption is 22.5% ahead (38,214 vs 29,601). Integer math sees the i9 at 188,022 versus 154,535, a 17.8% difference, while floating-point math is 18.5% higher at 131,007 against 106,716.

The only tests where the i7-14700 comes close are the single-threaded PassMark results, where the i9-13900F scores 4,406 versus 4,236, a slim 3.9% edge. This is the tightest margin in the entire dataset, indicating that in lightly-threaded tasks, the architectural refresh of the i7 nearly closes the gap. However, even in this near-miss, the i9 still wins. In the multi-threaded PassMark test, the i9 leads by 18.9% (49,693 vs 40,318), and in the physics simulation test, it is 19.5% ahead (2,766 vs 2,226). The i9 also dominates in random string sorting by 22.9% (70,441 vs 54,340) and in extended instructions by 22.3% (36,525 vs 28,388). The i9's win in find prime numbers is 19.6% (204 vs 164), rounding out a total sweep where the i7's best performance is a 3.9% deficit in single-threaded PassMark.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-14700 win any benchmark against the i9-13900F?

A: No. In the head-to-head data, the i9-13900F wins all 19 recorded tests, including every Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark workload. The i7-14700 has zero wins.

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F, with a score of 40,928, is 30.6% higher than the i7-14700's 28,398. This is the largest multi-core performance gap between the two in any test.

Q: How close are the two processors in single-threaded performance?

A: The closest margin is in PassMark single-thread, where the i9-13900F scores 4,406 and the i7-14700 scores 4,236, a 3.9% difference. In Geekbench single-core, the gap is 4.9% (2,533 vs 2,409), but in Cinebench R23 single-core, the i9 leads by 64% (5,778 vs 2,080).

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each CPU?

A: The i9-13900F has an average benchmark score of 51,730, while the i7-14700 has an average of 52,301. Despite the higher average for the i7, the i9 has a higher percentile ranking relative to its nearest rivals.

Q: Do both processors have the same cache structure?

A: No. The i9-13900F has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-14700 has 33 MB. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, compared to the i7-14700's 5.40 GHz. The i9 also has a higher base clock of 2000.00 MHz versus the i7's 2.10 GHz.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel's 10 nm process node and use the Raptor Lake architecture, but they belong to different refresh cycles. The i7-14700 is from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, with the codename Raptor Lake-R, while the i9-13900F is from the original Raptor Lake generation, codenamed Raptor Lake-S. This refresh status does not translate into a performance advantage, as the benchmark data shows the older i9 pulling ahead.

The core configurations differ significantly. The i9-13900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads. That four-core and four-thread deficit is a primary driver of the i7's multi-core losses. The cache hierarchy also differs, with the i9 offering 36 MB of shared L3 cache versus the i7's 33 MB. L1 and L2 caches are identical at 80 KB per core and 2 MB per core, respectively. Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel, have a die size of 257 mm², and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

A key architectural difference is the integrated graphics. The i7-14700 includes UHD Graphics 770, while the i9-13900F has no integrated graphics at all, as indicated by the null value in its specifications. Both support ECC memory, but they differ in PCIe lanes. The i9-13900F provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), whereas the i7-14700 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The i9 also has a higher boost clock at 5.60 GHz versus 5.40 GHz, and a higher base clock at 2000.00 MHz versus 2.10 GHz, despite the i7's nominal base being listed as 2.10.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs share the same socket (Intel Socket 1700), TDP (65), and process node (10 nm), but diverge in several key specifications. The i9-13900F has more cores (24 vs 20) and threads (32 vs 28). Its base clock is 2000.00 MHz, while the i7-14700 has a base clock of 2.10 GHz; the i9's boost clock is 5.60 GHz against the i7's 5.40 GHz. The L3 cache is larger on the i9 at 36 MB versus 33 MB on the i7. The i7-14700 includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the i9-13900F lacks any integrated graphics. PCIe lane support differs, with the i9 offering 20 Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) and the i7 offering 16 Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). The release dates also differ: the i9-13900F launched on 2023-01-03, and the i7-14700 launched on 2024-01-07. The launch MSRP for the i7-14700 is $384, and for the i9-13900F it is $524.

The Verdict

The data is decisive: the Intel Core i9-13900F is the superior processor in every measured benchmark. With 24 cores and 32 threads, it leverages its extra hardware to deliver a 30.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 13.2% lead in Geekbench multi-core. The i7-14700, despite its newer Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, cannot overcome the core deficit, and its only competitive moment is in single-threaded PassMark where it trails by just 3.9%. For any workload that scales with cores, the i9-13900F is the clear choice, offering a 17.8% to 22.9% advantage in PassMark integer math, floating-point math, and random string sorting. The i7-14700's higher average benchmark score of 52,301 versus 51,730 for the i9 is a statistical quirk from its nearest rival list, but the direct head-to-head results override that aggregate metric. The i9-13900F also has a higher boost clock and more L3 cache, reinforcing its performance edge. The only reason to prefer the i7-14700 would be its integrated graphics, which the i9 lacks entirely, but that feature does not appear in any benchmark result.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-13900F wins in every scenario covered by the benchmarks. It is the stronger option for multi-threaded productivity, as evidenced by its 30.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 18.9% lead in PassMark multithread. It also wins in single-threaded tasks, though by a smaller margin; the 4.9% Geekbench single-core lead and 3.9% PassMark single-thread lead confirm its superiority even in lightly-threaded workloads. For data-intensive operations, the i9 is ahead by 21.6% in data compression and 22.5% in data encryption, making it the better fit for compression or encryption tasks. In mathematical and physics workloads, the i9 leads by 17.8% in integer math and 19.5% in physics, indicating a clear advantage for simulation and calculation-heavy applications.

The Intel Core i7-14700 wins no benchmark, so there is no performance scenario where it is the superior choice based on the data. Its only potential advantage is the inclusion of integrated UHD Graphics 770, which the i9-13900F does not have, meaning the i7 can output video without a discrete GPU. However, this feature is not quantified in the benchmark results, so it does not influence any performance score. For users who prioritize raw CPU performance across all tested categories, the i9-13900F is the definitive winner. For users who require a CPU with built-in graphics and are willing to sacrifice significant multi-core performance, the i7-14700 is the only option of the two, but the benchmark data cannot recommend it on performance grounds.