CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 32 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 90W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Core i7-14700

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 33 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

1,761

3,454

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

248

487

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

7,338

14,393

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,035

2,031

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

17,472

34,270

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,466

4,838

passmark_data_compression

232,242

498,198

passmark_data_encryption

15,809

29,601

passmark_extended_instructions

14,251

28,388

passmark_find_prime_numbers

109

164

passmark_floating_point_math

34,757

106,716

passmark_integer_math

62,128

154,535

passmark_multithread

20,556

40,318

passmark_physics

1,905

2,226

passmark_random_string_sorting

34,613

54,340

passmark_single_thread

2,371

4,236

passmark_singlethread

2,371

4,236

geekbench_multicore

N/A

17,725

geekbench_singlecore

N/A

2,396

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Core i7-14700

Speed hunters analyzing I7-14700 from Intel against AMD's AMD EPYC 8024P might see at once that I7-14700 from Intel claims the lead. The silicon leads in intensive applications, establishing it excellent for professionals. The architectural improvements over AMD's AMD EPYC 8024P result into tangible practical gains. From productivity, I7-14700 from Intel steadily exceeds its counterpart. The margin is substantial sufficiently to influence actual experience.

In-game results also favor I7-14700 from Intel in this matchup. Better performance and enhanced steady performance result from the better per-core performance. Those who game will feel better experiences, notably in CPU-limited titles. The edge continues over multiple resolutions. Esports scenarios specifically profits from this performance superiority.

The bottom line: I7-14700 from Intel claims this battle decisively. Users seeking performance should definitely choose I7-14700 from Intel over AMD's AMD EPYC 8024P. The performance results supports this recommendation. Your scenarios might gain from its superior throughput. This is a obvious winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 8024P

i7-14700

Core Specs

Cores

20 +150.0%

Threads

28 +75.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.1 -12.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5.4 +80.0%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.1 -12.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5.4 +80.0%

Multiplier

21 -12.5%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

32 MB (shared)

33 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

65 -27.8%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

219 W

Configurable TDP

70-100 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4c

Raptor Lake

Codename

Siena

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

8,875 million

—

Die Size

73 mm²

257 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Six-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

230.4 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5600 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP6

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series

PCIe

Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12

E-Core Frequency

—

1500 MHz up to 4.2 GHz

P-Core Turbo

—

5.3 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

UHD Graphics 770

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$409

$384

Part Number

100-000001136

SRN40

Package

FC-LGA4844

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

None

Laminar RM1

View EPYC 8024P Details View Core i7-14700 Details