Intel Core i7-11375H vs Intel Xeon E-2186M Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-11375H wins every single head-to-head test against the Intel Xeon E-2186M, recording 8 wins out of 8 comparisons. The i7-11375H takes the overall advantage despite having fewer cores (4 versus 6) and a lower TDP (28 watts versus 45 watts). The largest gap appears in Geekbench single-core, where the i7-11375H leads by 25.5%, scoring 1800 versus 1434. Across all Cinebench tests, the margin is narrower but consistent, with deltas between 2.2% and 2.5%. The i7-11375H also holds a higher average benchmark score of 3018 compared to 2912 for the Xeon E-2186M, and it sits at the 52nd percentile among all CPUs versus the 51st percentile for the Xeon. For anyone choosing between these two, the data favors the i7-11375H for both single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded workloads, and it does so while drawing less power. The Xeon E-2186M, however, remains relevant only for workloads requiring ECC memory, a feature the i7-11375H does not support.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-11375H is faster in every single-core benchmark recorded. In Geekbench single-core, it scores 1800 versus 1434 for the Xeon E-2186M, a 25.5% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i7-11375H scores 1380 versus 1347, a 2.4% lead.

Q: Does the Xeon E-2186M win any benchmark?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows 8 wins for the i7-11375H and 0 wins for the Xeon E-2186M. The Xeon trails in all Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Geekbench tests, with deltas ranging from 1.5% to 25.5%.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Xeon E-2186M supports ECC memory. The i7-11375H does not. This is a key differentiation for workstation or server environments where error-correcting memory is required.

Q: How do the core counts differ between the two?

A: The i7-11375H has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2186M has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite the Xeon having more cores, the i7-11375H still wins in multi-core benchmarks, such as Cinebench R23 multi-core where it scores 9775 versus 9542.

Q: What is the production status of each chip?

A: The i7-11375H is listed as Active production, while the Xeon E-2186M is End-of-life. The Xeon also has an older release date of April 2018, compared to January 2021 for the i7-11375H.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The i7-11375H has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Xeon E-2186M boosts to 4.80 GHz. The i7 also has a slightly higher base clock at 3.00 GHz versus 2.90 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel architecture families. The i7-11375H is built on the Tiger Lake architecture, specifically Tiger Lake-H, using a 10 nm process node. The Xeon E-2186M is based on the older Coffee Lake architecture, Coffee Lake-H, on a 14 nm process node. This process difference is significant: the 10 nm node allows the i7-11375H to deliver higher clock speeds (5.00 GHz boost versus 4.80 GHz) while operating at a lower TDP of 28 watts versus 45 watts for the Xeon. The die size also reflects this, with the i7 measuring 146.1 mm² and the Xeon at 154 mm².

Cache layouts differ per core. The i7-11375H has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, while the Xeon E-2186M has 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core. Both share 12 MB of L3 cache. The per-core cache advantage of the i7 likely contributes to its strong single-core performance, especially the 25.5% lead in Geekbench single-core.

Integrated graphics also differ. The i7-11375H comes with Iris XE 96EU, while the Xeon E-2186M features UHD Graphics P630. The i7 also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Xeon is limited to PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Memory bandwidth is higher on the i7 at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s on the Xeon, even though both support DDR4 and dual-channel memory. The Xeon does support ECC memory, which the i7 does not, and that remains its sole architectural edge for reliability-focused deployments.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-11375H | Intel Xeon E-2186M |

|----------------|----------------------|--------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1449 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Architecture | Tiger Lake | Coffee Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | 146.1 mm² | 154 mm² |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 80 KB | 64 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 1.25 MB | 256 KB |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 3, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris XE 96EU | UHD Graphics P630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | January 2021 | April 2018 |

| Launch MSRP | $482 | $623 |

The specification table shows a generational leap for the i7-11375H: newer process, higher clocks, lower power, and faster PCIe and memory bandwidth. The Xeon E-2186M counters with more cores and threads, plus ECC support, but on an older platform.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a clean sweep for the i7-11375H. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7 scores 985 versus 961 for the Xeon, a 2.5% delta. In R15 single-core, the i7 scores 138 versus 135, a 2.2% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the i7 leads multi-core with 4105 versus 4007 (2.4%) and single-core with 579 versus 565 (2.5%). In Cinebench R23, the i7 again wins multi-core with 9775 versus 9542 (2.4%) and single-core with 1380 versus 1347 (2.4%).

Geekbench results show a wider split. In Geekbench multi-core, the i7 scores 5383 versus 5306, a 1.5% delta. In Geekbench single-core, the i7 dominates with 1800 versus 1434, a massive 25.5% advantage. This single-core result is the standout data point in the comparison, suggesting that the i7-11375H's combination of higher boost clock, newer architecture, and larger per-core cache translates into a substantial advantage for lightly threaded workloads. The multi-core margins are smaller, which is notable given the Xeon has 6 cores versus 4, but the i7 still prevails across every multi-threaded test.

The average benchmark scores reinforce this: the i7-11375H averages 3018 across all recorded tests, while the Xeon E-2186M averages 2912. The i7's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 5600U at an average score of 3053 (a -1.1% delta) and the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 at 2978 (a 1.3% delta). The Xeon E-2186M's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 at 2909 (0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i5-1335UE at 2907 (0.2% delta).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-11375H wins in every measured category, so the use-case split is not about performance but about specific feature requirements. The i7-11375H is the clear choice for mobile computing, being in the Mobile market segment with a 28 W TDP. It delivers higher single-core performance (25.5% ahead in Geekbench single-core), faster multi-core scores across all Cinebench tests, newer PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes, and higher memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s. It is also still in active production, making it a viable option for current system builds. Its launch MSRP of $482 is lower than the Xeon's $623, though the database does not evaluate cost-effectiveness.

The Intel Xeon E-2186M, despite losing all benchmarks, retains a specific role: any workload requiring ECC memory. As a Server/Workstation segment chip, the Xeon supports ECC, which the i7 does not. It also offers more cores (6 versus 4) and threads (12 versus 8), which could theoretically benefit heavily parallel tasks, but the benchmark data shows the i7 still outperforms it in multi-threaded tests anyway. The Xeon is end-of-life, so it is not suitable for new designs, but for legacy systems or environments where ECC is mandatory, it remains the only option between these two. Its higher TDP of 45 watts suggests it is built for sustained server-like operation, but the i7 achieves better results at lower power.

For buyers prioritizing performance, power efficiency, and modern features, the i7-11375H is the definitive winner. For buyers who must have ECC memory and can accept older technology, the Xeon E-2186M is the only pick, but its benchmark deficits mean it should only be chosen for that specific requirement. The data does not support any other rationale for selecting the Xeon.