Intel Core i7-11375H vs Intel Core i7-8700B Comparison

The Intel Core i7-8700B and Intel Core i7-11375H come from different eras and market segments. The 8700B is a desktop Coffee Lake part with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the 11375H is a mobile Tiger Lake-H chip with 4 cores and 8 threads. The recorded benchmark data reveals a clear split: the 8700B dominates multi-threaded tests, while the 11375H takes a decisive single-core win in Geekbench. This analysis walks through the numbers, what they imply, and which processor fits which workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show the 8700B winning 7 of 8 tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the 8700B scores 1005 against 985 for the 11375H, a 2% lead. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multicore, where the 8700B posts 4190 versus 4105, a 2.1% margin, and in R23 multicore, with 9977 against 9775, again 2.1% ahead. Single-core Cinebench tests also favor the 8700B: R15 singlecore shows 141 versus 138, a 2.2% lead; R20 singlecore shows 591 versus 579, a 2.1% lead; and R23 singlecore shows 1408 versus 1380, a 2% lead. These are narrow but consistent wins across the entire Cinebench suite.

The largest win for the 8700B comes in Geekbench multicore, where it scores 5936 against 5383, a 10.3% advantage. That is a substantial gap, reflecting the 8700B's extra cores and threads. The only test the 11375H wins is Geekbench singlecore, and it wins big: 1800 versus 1443, a 19.8% lead. This is the single most lopsided result in the comparison, and it flips the narrative for anyone focused on single-threaded performance.

The average benchmark scores reinforce the overall picture. The 8700B has an average score of 3086, while the 11375H sits at 3018. Both processors land in the 52nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, meaning they are statistically similar in overall standing, but the 8700B edges ahead in raw average output. The head-to-head data shows that the 8700B's wins are consistent, while the 11375H's one win is a outlier in magnitude.

Where Each One Wins

The 8700B wins every multi-threaded test in the comparison. That includes all three Cinebench multicore variants and Geekbench multicore. The 8700B's 6 cores and 12 threads give it a clear structural advantage over the 11375H's 4 cores and 8 threads. For workloads that scale with core count, such as rendering, video encoding, or scientific simulation, the data points squarely to the 8700B. The 10.3% lead in Geekbench multicore is the strongest evidence of this.

The 11375H wins only Geekbench singlecore, but it wins by a wide margin. The 19.8% advantage suggests that the 11375H's architecture, with its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz on the 8700B, is particularly strong in lightly threaded tasks. This could matter for applications that rely on a single thread, such as certain legacy software or interactive workloads. However, the 11375H does not win any of the Cinebench singlecore tests, which are also single-threaded. That inconsistency is curious: the 11375H leads in Geekbench singlecore but trails in Cinebench singlecore by 2% to 2.2%. The data does not explain why, but it suggests that the 11375H's advantage is specific to the Geekbench workload, not a universal single-threaded superiority.

For users who need a balanced processor, the 8700B is the safer choice. It wins the majority of tests and has a higher average score. For users who prioritize a single specific benchmark, the 11375H offers a compelling spike in Geekbench singlecore, but that spike does not translate to other single-threaded tests in this dataset.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-8700B has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-11375H has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-11375H has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-8700B has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which CPU wins in Geekbench singlecore?

A: The Intel Core i7-11375H scores 1800 versus 1443 for the 8700B, a 19.8% advantage.

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-8700B has an average score of 3086, while the Intel Core i7-11375H has an average score of 3018.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The 8700B uses a 14 nm process, while the 11375H uses a 10 nm process.

Q: Which CPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core i7-11375H has a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel Core i7-8700B has 42.7 GB/s.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The 8700B has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the 11375H has 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 3.20 GHz for the 8700B and 3.00 GHz for the 11375H. Boost clocks are 4.60 GHz and 5.00 GHz, respectively. TDP differs significantly: 65 W for the 8700B versus 28 W for the 11375H. The sockets are different: Intel BGA 1440 for the 8700B and Intel BGA 1449 for the 11375H. The architecture and codename differ: Coffee Lake versus Tiger Lake-H. Process nodes are 14 nm and 10 nm. Die sizes are 154 mm² and 146.1 mm². L1 cache is 64 KB per core for the 8700B and 80 KB per core for the 11375H. L2 cache is 256 KB per core versus 1.25 MB per core. Memory bandwidth is 42.7 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s. PCIe support is Gen 3 with 16 lanes for the 8700B, and Gen 4 with 20 lanes for the 11375H. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 630 versus Iris XE 96EU. Market segments are Desktop and Mobile. Production status is End-of-life for the 8700B and Active for the 11375H. Release dates are 2018-04-02 and 2021-01-10. Launch MSRP is $303 for the 8700B and $482 for the 11375H. Part numbers are SRCX2 and SRKH4.

Both processors share some specifications: they both support DDR4 memory, use dual-channel memory buses, have 12 MB of shared L3 cache, do not support ECC memory, and have locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between Coffee Lake and Tiger Lake is substantial. The 8700B is built on a 14 nm process, while the 11375H uses a 10 nm process. The newer process allows the 11375H to pack more transistors per area, though the die size is slightly smaller at 146.1 mm² versus 154 mm². The core layout differs: the 8700B has 6 cores with 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, while the 11375H has 4 cores with 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The larger L2 cache on the 11375H is notable, but the shared L3 cache is identical at 12 MB.

The memory subsystem also differs. The 11375H has a higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s compared to 42.7 GB/s for the 8700B, despite both using dual-channel DDR4. The PCIe support is a generation ahead on the 11375H: Gen 4 with 20 lanes versus Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are also different: the 8700B has UHD Graphics 630, while the 11375H has Iris XE 96EU, which is a more capable iGPU. The 11375H is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, while the 8700B is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP. The 11375H is still in active production, while the 8700B is end-of-life.

These architectural differences explain some of the benchmark results. The 11375H's higher boost clock and newer process likely contribute to its Geekbench singlecore win. The 8700B's extra cores and threads give it the multi-threaded edge. The memory bandwidth and PCIe differences do not directly appear in the benchmark scores, but they are relevant for system-level performance in tasks like data transfer or GPU communication.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i7-8700B as the stronger overall performer in this head-to-head. It wins 7 of 8 tests, including all multi-threaded benchmarks and all Cinebench singlecore tests. Its average benchmark score of 3086 is higher than the 11375H's 3018. For users who need a desktop processor for multi-threaded workloads, the 8700B is the clear choice.

The Intel Core i7-11375H has one significant advantage: a 19.8% lead in Geekbench singlecore. That is a large margin, and it suggests the 11375H is better suited for tasks that rely heavily on a single thread, at least in the Geekbench workload. However, the 11375H does not win any other single-threaded test, so its advantage is not universal. It is also a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, making it suitable for laptops where power efficiency matters. The 11375H is newer, still in production, and has a higher boost clock, but the benchmark data shows that the 8700B's extra cores and threads deliver more consistent performance across the board.

For a desktop user who values multi-core throughput, the 8700B is the pick. For a mobile user who needs a single-threaded performance spike and lower power consumption, the 11375H is the pick. The data does not support a universal recommendation for the 11375H, but it does highlight a specific niche where it excels.