Intel Core i7-10700F vs Intel Core i7-11600H Comparison

The Intel Core i7-11600H and Intel Core i7-10700F represent two distinct interpretations of a six and eight core part, respectively, from Intel’s mobile and desktop lineups. The recorded data shows a clear split in workload dominance: the desktop-oriented i7-10700F secures the majority of benchmark wins with 14 victories, while the mobile i7-11600H counters with 5 wins, primarily in single-thread and specialized instruction tasks. The average benchmark scores are close, with the i7-11600H at 19921 and the i7-10700F at 19499, a difference of roughly 2.2% in favor of the mobile chip. This narrow overall margin masks the significant per-test swings, where the i7-10700F leads by as much as 29.7% in some multi-threaded workloads, while the i7-11600H turns the tables with a 80.7% advantage in encryption tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core i7-10700F is the stronger choice for heavily threaded, throughput-oriented applications. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-10700F scores 13689 against 13286 for the i7-11600H, a 2.9% lead. The gap widens considerably in Geekbench multi-core, where the i7-10700F posts 7867 versus 6563, a 16.6% advantage. PassMark integer math also favors the desktop chip, with 62579 compared to 55437, an 11.4% margin. Data compression is another clear win for the i7-10700F: 253358 versus 190721, a 24.7% lead. Random string sorting shows the largest multi-threaded gap, with the i7-10700F scoring 31625 against 22217, a 29.7% edge. These results suggest the i7-10700F leverages its additional two cores and four threads to dominate workloads that scale with parallel execution.

Conversely, the Intel Core i7-11600H claims victory in single-thread and latency-sensitive tasks. Geekbench single-core is a decisive win for the mobile chip: 1924 versus 1555, a 23.7% advantage. PassMark single-thread also goes to the i7-11600H, with 3019 against 2875, a 5% lead. The i7-11600H further excels in data encryption, scoring 9718 versus 5378, an 80.7% margin, and in prime number finding, with 65 versus 47, a 38.3% edge. These wins point to a mobile processor with superior per-core efficiency and instruction-level optimizations that the older desktop architecture lacks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The i7-11600H uses the Tiger Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node, while the i7-10700F relies on the Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm node. This process gap explains much of the efficiency difference: the i7-11600H has a TDP of 35 watts, whereas the i7-10700F draws 65 watts. The mobile chip also features a smaller die size of 190 mm², while the desktop part has no recorded die size.

Core and cache configurations diverge significantly. The i7-11600H packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The i7-10700F offers 8 cores and 16 threads, with 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Despite having fewer cores, the i7-11600H holds a larger L3 pool, which contributes to its single-thread and encryption wins. Memory bandwidth also differs: the i7-11600H supports 51.2 GB/s, while the i7-10700F is rated at 46.9 GB/s, both over dual-channel DDR4.

Platform features separate the two further. The i7-11600H uses the Intel BGA 1787 socket and includes integrated UHD Graphics 750, making it a self-contained mobile solution. The i7-10700F uses Intel Socket 1200 and has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. PCIe support also differs: the i7-11600H provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the i7-10700F offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The i7-11600H launched on 2021-05-10 with a launch MSRP of $395, while the i7-10700F released on 2020-04-29 with no recorded launch price. Both are still active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench family of tests shows a consistent, if modest, edge for the i7-10700F. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-10700F scores 1379 versus 1339, a 2.9% lead. Single-core R15 goes the same way: 194 versus 188, a 3.1% margin. Cinebench R20 multi-core follows with 5749 against 5580, again a 2.9% gap, and single-core R20 shows 811 versus 787, a 3% edge. Cinebench R23 multi-core records 13689 versus 13286, a 2.9% difference, while single-core R23 sees 1932 versus 1875, a 3% lead. Across all six Cinebench tests, the i7-10700F wins each by roughly 3%, a narrow but consistent pattern that suggests the extra cores and higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz provide a steady advantage.

Geekbench presents a more dramatic split. The i7-10700F wins multi-core with 7867 against 6563, a 16.6% margin, but loses single-core badly: 1555 versus 1924, a 23.7% deficit in favor of the i7-11600H. This 40.3 percentage point swing between the two Geekbench tests highlights how differently the architectures handle single versus multi-threaded loads.

PassMark workloads further illustrate the divergence. The i7-10700F takes data compression 253358 to 190721, a 24.7% lead, and extended instructions 16389 to 12938, a 21.1% margin. Floating point math goes to the desktop chip at 38578 versus 32963, a 14.6% edge, and integer math at 62579 versus 55437, an 11.4% lead. Random string sorting is the largest PassMark win for the i7-10700F: 31625 versus 22217, a 29.7% gap. Multithread overall favors the i7-10700F narrowly, 16227 versus 16093, a 0.8% margin, and physics shows 803 versus 763, a 5% lead. The i7-11600H counters in PassMark with data encryption 9718 versus 5378, an 80.7% win, prime numbers 65 versus 47, a 38.3% win, and single-thread 3019 versus 2875, a 5% win. The encryption result is particularly striking, as it indicates the Tiger Lake architecture contains hardware or microcode optimizations that the Comet Lake part cannot match.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear use-case split. The Intel Core i7-10700F is the pick for multi-threaded productivity, content creation, and any workload that can exploit 16 threads. Its wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core, Geekbench multi-core, and PassMark integer and floating point math make it the stronger candidate for rendering, compiling, and data processing. The i7-11600H, despite fewer cores, wins decisively in single-thread performance and encryption, making it suitable for lightly threaded applications, responsive general use, and security-heavy tasks. The i7-11600H also offers integrated graphics, a lower TDP of 35 watts, and PCIe Gen 4 support, which are practical advantages for mobile platforms. The i7-10700F, with no integrated graphics and a 65 watt TDP, is strictly a desktop component that requires a discrete GPU. Both processors sit at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores differ by only 2.2%, so neither is a universal winner. Users prioritizing raw multi-threaded output should choose the i7-10700F; those needing per-core speed, encryption performance, or an all-in-one mobile package should select the i7-11600H.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core Geekbench score?

A: The Intel Core i7-11600H wins Geekbench single-core with 1924 points, a 23.7% advantage over the i7-10700F’s 1555 points.

Q: How much faster is the i7-10700F in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The i7-10700F scores 13689 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 2.9% higher than the i7-11600H’s 13286.

Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-10700F has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-11600H has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the i7-11600H include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i7-11600H includes UHD Graphics 750, while the i7-10700F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the largest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest margin is in PassMark data encryption, where the i7-11600H scores 9718 versus 5378, an 80.7% advantage.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i7-10700F has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, compared to the i7-11600H’s 4.60 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The i7-11600H has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i7-10700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock rates are 2.50 GHz for the i7-11600H and 2.90 GHz for the i7-10700F, with boost clocks of 4.60 GHz and 4.80 GHz, respectively. The i7-11600H carries a TDP of 35 watts, the i7-10700F a TDP of 65 watts. Sockets differ: Intel BGA 1787 for the mobile chip versus Intel Socket 1200 for the desktop chip. The i7-11600H uses the Tiger Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node, while the i7-10700F uses Comet Lake on a 14 nm node. Cache layouts also vary: the i7-11600H has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3, while the i7-10700F has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s for the i7-11600H versus 46.9 GB/s for the i7-10700F. PCIe support differs as well, with the i7-11600H offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes and the i7-10700F providing Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The i7-11600H includes UHD Graphics 750, while the i7-10700F has none. Market segments are mobile and desktop, respectively, with the i7-11600H launching on 2021-05-10 at a launch MSRP of $395, and the i7-10700F launching on 2020-04-29 with no recorded launch MSRP.