Intel Core i5-7600T vs Intel Core i7-4810MQ Comparison

Intel Core i5-7600T vs Intel Core i7-4810MQ: a 14 nm desktop part from the Kaby Lake generation against a 22 nm mobile processor from the Haswell era. The benchmark data splits cleanly across suites. The i7-4810MQ takes all six Cinebench tests, while the i5-7600T wins both Geekbench tests. The overall score averages nearly match, but the distribution of wins reveals distinct strengths. The i7-4810MQ edges ahead in Cinebench R15 multi-core with 516 against 500, a 3.1% margin. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 72 versus 70, a 2.8% gap. These margins widen slightly in newer Cinebench versions. In R20 multi-core, the i7 scores 2154 versus 2086, a 3.2% difference. R20 single-core shows 304 versus 294, a 3.3% gap. The R23 multi-core test repeats the trend: 5129 versus 4968, a 3.1% margin. R23 single-core lands at 724 versus 701, a 3.2% difference. Every Cinebench result favors the older i7, but the margins are consistent and narrow, hovering just above three percent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Geekbench results reverse the trend with larger swings. In Geekbench multi-core, the i5-7600T scores 3447 against the i7-4810MQ’s 3203, a 7.6% lead. The single-core Geekbench test shows an even bigger advantage: 1246 versus 1106, a 12.7% difference. These are the two largest deltas in the entire comparison. The i7-4810MQ wins six of the eight head-to-head tests, but the i5-7600T’s two victories come with much wider margins. The aggregated averages tell a similar story from a different angle. The i5-7600T has an average benchmark score of 1664, while the i7-4810MQ sits at 1651, a difference of less than one percent. Both processors land in the 40th percentile of all CPUs, which places them in the same performance tier despite their architectural gaps.

The Cinebench results favor the i7-4810MQ consistently, but none of those wins exceed 3.3%. The Geekbench results favor the i5-7600T by margins that are roughly four times larger. The i5’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-6700TE at 1666 (a 0.1% difference) and the Intel Core i7-4770HQ at 1660 (0.3% ahead). The i7-4810MQ’s closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H at 1653, which trails by 0.1%. The Intel Core i5-4670K appears in both lists, sitting 0.5% above the i5-7600T and 0.3% below the i7-4810MQ. These rival scores confirm that both processors sit in a crowded mid-range band where small benchmark differences translate into near-identical average scores.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-4810MQ owns the Cinebench suite, which means it holds an advantage in rendering workloads that scale with thread count. The data shows a 3.1% lead in R15 multi-core, a 3.2% lead in R20 multi-core, and a 3.1% lead in R23 multi-core. The single-core Cinebench tests also go to the i7, with margins between 2.8% and 3.3%. This consistency across every Cinebench version suggests the i7’s higher boost clock of 3.80 GHz compared to the i5’s 3.70 GHz provides a small but measurable edge in that rendering engine. The i7 also benefits from 8 threads versus 4, which explains the multi-core wins despite identical core counts. The i5-7600T counters in Geekbench, where it leads by 7.6% in multi-core and 12.7% in single-core. The single-core Geekbench result is the standout number in this comparison, indicating that the i5’s Kaby Lake architecture delivers significantly better per-thread performance in that workload.

The split suggests workload-specific behavior. The i7-4810MQ is the safer choice for Cinebench-style rendering tasks, where its thread advantage and slightly higher boost clock pay off. The i5-7600T is better suited for Geekbench-style mixed workloads that reward newer architecture and faster memory bandwidth. The i5’s memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s versus the i7’s 25.6 GB/s likely contributes to the Geekbench gap, though the benchmark numbers alone cannot isolate that variable. The i5 also supports DDR4 memory while the i7 uses DDR3, which may influence results in memory-sensitive tests. Both processors share the same 6 MB of L3 cache, so cache capacity does not explain any of the observed differences.

The Verdict

Data-driven conclusions point to a narrow overall win for the i7-4810MQ. It wins six of eight benchmarks, including every Cinebench test, and its average score of 1651 trails the i5-7600T by only 0.8%. The i5-7600T’s average of 1664 is slightly higher, but that average is inflated by the two Geekbench wins with large margins. The i7-4810MQ wins more tests, and its defeats come by smaller margins than its victories. Buyers focused on rendering performance should choose the i7-4810MQ, as it leads in all six Cinebench workloads. Users whose primary applications resemble Geekbench will find the i5-7600T faster, particularly in single-threaded tasks where it leads by 12.7%. The i5-7600T also carries a lower 35 W TDP versus the i7’s 47 W, which matters for systems with tight thermal budgets. The i7-4810MQ is marked end-of-life while the i5-7600T remains active, but production status alone does not determine performance. The data shows two processors in the same percentile band with divergent benchmark profiles. The i7-4810MQ is the more consistent performer across the broader test suite.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The Intel Core i7-4810MQ wins 6 of the 8 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel Core i5-7600T wins 2.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in Geekbench single-core, where the i5-7600T leads by 12.7%, scoring 1246 versus 1106.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i5-7600T has an average benchmark score of 1664, while the i7-4810MQ averages 1651, a difference of 0.8%.

Q: Do both processors occupy the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the i5-7600T and the i7-4810MQ rank in the 40th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The i7-4810MQ has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, while the i5-7600T boosts to 3.70 GHz.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The i5-7600T supports 38.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the i7-4810MQ provides 25.6 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and manufacturing nodes. The i5-7600T uses the Kaby Lake architecture built on a 14 nm process, while the i7-4810MQ uses the older Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process. The i7-4810MQ carries 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die, while the i5-7600T does not list transistor count or die size in the available data. Both chips have 4 physical cores, but the i7-4810MQ supports 8 threads through Hyper-Threading, while the i5-7600T operates with 4 threads. The L1 cache is 64 KB per core on both, and the L2 cache is 256 KB per core on both. The L3 cache is 6 MB shared on both processors. The i5-7600T supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus, while the i7-4810MQ supports DDR3 with a dual-channel bus. The i5-7600T includes integrated graphics in the form of HD 630, while the i7-4810MQ uses Intel HD 4600. The i5-7600T is a desktop part on the Intel Socket 1151, while the i7-4810MQ is a mobile processor on Intel Socket G3. Both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU and neither supports ECC memory. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The core specifications differ in several measurable ways. The i5-7600T has 4 threads, while the i7-4810MQ has 8 threads. The base clocks are identical at 2.80 GHz, but the boost clocks differ by 0.10 GHz, with the i7-4810MQ reaching 3.80 GHz and the i5-7600T reaching 3.70 GHz. The thermal design power is 35 W for the i5-7600T and 47 W for the i7-4810MQ. The memory support differs, with the i5-7600T using DDR4 and the i7-4810MQ using DDR3. Memory bandwidth is 38.4 GB/s for the i5-7600T and 25.6 GB/s for the i7-4810MQ. The integrated graphics are HD 630 on the i5-7600T and Intel HD 4600 on the i7-4810MQ. The market segments differ, with the i5-7600T classified as desktop and the i7-4810MQ as mobile. Production status also differs: the i5-7600T is active, while the i7-4810MQ is end-of-life. The release dates are separate, with the i5-7600T launching in 2017-01-02 and the i7-4810MQ launching in 2014-01-19. The part numbers are SR336 for the i5-7600T and SR1PV for the i7-4810MQ. The i7-4810MQ has a launch MSRP of $378; no launch MSRP is listed for the i5-7600T.