Intel Core i5-14501TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501TE is a desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The chip has a 45 W TDP, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics. Its cache layout comprises 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is active in production, was released on 2024-06-30, and carries the part number Q49KSRNJN.

Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, built on the Panther Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process node. It is mounted on Intel BGA 2540 and features 16 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The chip has a 25 W TDP, supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and includes Intel Xe3 Graphics as integrated graphics. Its cache layout comprises 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is active in production, was released on 2026-01-04, and carries the part number SA4RD.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits cleanly between the two processors according to workload type. The Core Ultra 5 336H claims all recorded benchmark wins, with 16 wins against 0 for the i5-14501TE, but the nature of those wins matters for practical use. The mobile chip leads in every category where scores are available, which includes Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both multi-core and single-core tests, plus a range of Passmark workloads such as integer math, floating point math, data compression, and data encryption.

The Core Ultra 5 336H delivers its strongest advantage in multi-threaded rendering workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 demonstrates a substantial lead over the desktop part, which has no recorded score in the database, but the relative position can be inferred from the mobile chip's overall percentile rank of 84. The desktop i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile across all CPUs, indicating that the Ultra 5 336H is positioned significantly higher in the overall performance distribution.

For single-threaded tasks, the Ultra 5 336H posts a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3387 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4013. These numbers place it well above the median CPU, reinforcing its strength in lightly threaded applications. The desktop i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its single-core capability cannot be directly quantified, but its lower percentile rank suggests it trails the mobile chip in this area.

The data compression and encryption workloads also favor the Core Ultra 5 336H. Its Passmark data compression score of 280340 and data encryption score of 21291 indicate strong performance in these specific tasks, which are common in file archiving and security-related applications. The floating point math score of 82415 and integer math score of 62070 further confirm the mobile chip's dominance across mixed computational workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different architectural generations and design philosophies. The i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, which is a desktop-oriented design with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture, specifically the Panther Lake-H variant, fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process node. This process difference is substantial, with the 3 nm node representing a more advanced manufacturing technology that enables higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

Core counts differ significantly. The i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating that it uses Hyper-Threading to double its thread count. The Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads, with no thread doubling, meaning it relies on a higher physical core count for its multi-threaded performance. This structural difference explains why the mobile chip excels in multi-core benchmarks despite having a lower boost clock of 4.60 GHz compared to 5.10 GHz on the desktop part.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The i5-14501TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 336H has 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations on the Ultra 5 336H suggest a design optimized for per-core performance, while the larger L3 on the desktop part provides more shared capacity for the fewer cores.

Memory support differs in scope. The i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, offering flexibility for different motherboard platforms. The Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a specified memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, which reflects the higher-speed memory options available to mobile designs. ECC memory support is present on the desktop part but absent on the mobile chip.

PCIe lane counts also differ. The i5-14501TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 5 336H provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes. Both use the same PCIe generation, but the desktop part offers more lanes for expansion cards and peripherals. The market segments are distinct as well: the i5-14501TE targets desktop systems with Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 336H targets mobile systems with BGA 2540.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are limited because the database contains no recorded scores for the i5-14501TE. All available benchmark data belongs to the Core Ultra 5 336H, which means the analysis relies on the mobile chip's absolute scores and its position relative to comparable processors in the database.

The Core Ultra 5 336H's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 is its most prominent result. This score places the chip at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, which is well above the i5-14501TE's 50th percentile. The nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-13700HX with an average score of 34554 and a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Core i5-13450HX with 34333 and a delta of 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with 34260 and a delta of 0.7%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 with 34222 and a delta of 0.8%. These deltas indicate that the Ultra 5 336H performs within a narrow band of these established processors, essentially matching them in overall average benchmark score.

In single-core performance, the Cinebench R23 score of 3387 and Cinebench R20 score of 1422 show consistent results across test versions. The Passmark single-thread score of 4013 aligns with this pattern. These numbers indicate that the mobile chip handles lightly threaded workloads with competence, which is relevant for applications that rely on a single primary thread.

The Passmark multi-thread score of 28545 and physics score of 2682 provide additional context for multi-core capability. The extended instructions score of 24542 and random string sorting score of 34402 round out the picture of a processor that performs well across diverse compute tasks. The find prime numbers score of 299 is notably lower, which may reflect the specific algorithmic characteristics of that workload.

The i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores, so direct numerical comparisons between the two parts are not possible from the data. The only comparative signal is the percentile rank: 50th for the desktop part versus 84th for the mobile part. This difference of 34 percentile points indicates that the Core Ultra 5 336H sits much higher in the overall performance distribution.

The Verdict

The data points to the Core Ultra 5 336H as the stronger performer across all recorded benchmarks. Its 84th percentile rank versus the 50th percentile of the i5-14501TE indicates a clear performance advantage in the database's overall CPU ranking. The mobile chip's 16 cores and 16 threads provide a substantial multi-threading capability that the 6-core, 12-thread desktop part cannot match, and the 3 nm process node gives the Ultra 5 336H a manufacturing advantage that likely contributes to its efficiency.

Users with desktop systems on Socket 1700 who require DDR4 support or ECC memory would select the i5-14501TE, as those features are exclusive to that part. The desktop chip also offers more PCIe lanes, with 16 lanes versus 12 lanes, which matters for systems with multiple expansion cards. The higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz on the i5-14501TE could provide an advantage in specific single-threaded scenarios, though no benchmark data confirms this.

Users in the mobile space, or those prioritizing multi-core performance and power efficiency, would select the Core Ultra 5 336H. Its 25 W TDP is significantly lower than the 45 W TDP of the desktop part, making it suitable for battery-powered devices. The memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and support for LPDDR5X memory further align it with mobile computing needs. The absence of ECC support on the mobile chip is a limitation for certain professional workloads, but the benchmark scores indicate strong general-purpose performance.

The release timeline also distinguishes the two parts. The i5-14501TE was released on 2024-06-30, while the Core Ultra 5 336H was released on 2026-01-04, making the mobile chip the newer design by a substantial margin. This generational gap is reflected in the architectural differences and process node improvements.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses a 3 nm process node.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a specified memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, while no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel Core i5-14501TE.

Q: What is the percentile rank of each processor among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE is at the 50th percentile, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is at the 84th percentile.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors:

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14501TE | Intel Core Ultra 5 336H |

|---------------|----------------------|-------------------------|

| Series | Core 14th Gen | Core Ultra Series 3 |

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 25 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Panther Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Panther Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 115.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Supported | Not supported |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2026-01-04 |

| Part Number | Q49KSRNJN | SA4RD |