AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and the Intel Core i5-14501TE target different corners of the desktop market, and the data supports a clear split. The AMD part, with its 4-core/8-thread Zen 4 design, delivers a 72nd percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap alone tells the primary story: the AMD chip is the stronger overall performer in the database’s aggregate scoring. The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE shows an average benchmark score of 18505, placing it ahead of several Intel Core i3 and i5-class parts in its nearest rival list, including the Intel Core i5-13420H (delta 0%), the Intel Core i3-14100F (delta -0.1%), and the Intel Core i3-13100 (delta 0.7%).

For users who prioritize raw single-thread responsiveness and the higher boost clock, the Intel Core i5-14501TE presents a compelling case on paper, with a 5.10 GHz boost versus the AMD’s 4.90 GHz. However, the database records no benchmark scores for the Intel part, meaning its performance claims cannot be verified from the recorded data. The AMD chip has a full set of 17 benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark suites. The Intel part has zero recorded benchmarks, zero wins in head-to-head comparisons, and an average benchmark score of zero.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the only part with measurable performance evidence, and it should be chosen by anyone who needs verified multi-threaded and single-threaded results. The Intel Core i5-14501TE offers a larger core count (6 vs 4) and more threads (12 vs 8), plus a bigger L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB), but without benchmark data, those specifications do not translate into proven performance. Builders who require validated performance numbers from the database should select the AMD part. The Intel part remains an unverified option whose real-world behavior is not represented in the recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel part offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a substantially larger 24 MB of shared L3. This L3 advantage could benefit workloads with high cache reuse, though the AMD part’s smaller cache is paired with a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz versus the Intel’s 2.20 GHz.

Memory support also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, though its memory bandwidth is not recorded. Both parts support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ as well: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ, with the AMD part using Radeon 740M and the Intel part using UHD Graphics 770.

The AMD processor belongs to the 8000 series and the Ryzen 3 generation, with a release date of April 2024. The Intel processor belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and the Core i5 generation, with a release date of June 2024. Both parts are currently active in production and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The process node difference is stark: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel, which partially explains the AMD part’s higher efficiency at a lower TDP of 35 watts versus the Intel part’s 45 watts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data is empty, meaning no direct comparative tests exist in the database between these two specific processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, however, has extensive individual benchmark results that establish its performance envelope. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1260 in multi-core and 177 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5254 multi-core and 741 single-core. In Cinebench R23, the most demanding of the trio, it scores 12511 multi-core and 1766 single-core. These Cinebench results show a consistent pattern: the single-core scores are competitive for a 4-core part, while the multi-core scores benefit from the 8 threads and the 4.90 GHz boost clock.

Passmark results for the AMD chip provide additional context. The multi-thread score is 14403, with a single-thread score of 3828. In specialized workloads, the AMD part scores 40348 in integer math, 25258 in floating-point math, 162623 in data compression, 9224 in data encryption, 12313 in extended instructions, 52 in find prime numbers, 857 in physics, and 20134 in random string sorting. These scores place the AMD part at the 72nd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18505. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13420H, averages 18511 with a 0% delta, meaning the AMD chip is statistically tied with that mobile Intel part. The AMD chip is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i3-14100F and 0.7% ahead of both the Intel Core i3-13100 and the Intel Core 7 360.

Since the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmarks, no direct comparisons can be made between the two parts in any specific test. The database shows zero wins for either side in head-to-head matchups. The practical interpretation is that the AMD part has a verified performance profile, while the Intel part’s performance is entirely unknown from the recorded data. Any performance claims for the Intel part would be speculative, which the database does not support.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE’s 4.90 GHz boost.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE support DDR4 memory?

A: No, the AMD part supports only DDR5 memory. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE is built on Intel’s 10 nm process.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher recorded average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has an average benchmark score of 18505, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has an average benchmark score of 0, as it has no recorded benchmarks in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE wins in every measurable performance category because it is the only part with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12511 and single-core score of 1766 establish a concrete performance baseline. Its Passmark single-thread score of 3828 and multi-thread score of 14403 provide additional verification. The AMD part’s 72nd percentile ranking against all CPUs, compared to the Intel part’s 50th percentile, gives it a clear aggregate advantage. In the database’s nearest rival comparison, the AMD chip matches or slightly exceeds several Intel parts, including the Intel Core i5-13420H (0% delta), the Intel Core i3-13100 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Core 7 360 (0.7% ahead). The AMD part also wins on efficiency, with a 35-watt TDP versus the Intel part’s 45 watts, and on process technology, with a 4 nm node versus 10 nm.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins on paper in several specification categories that could translate to performance in unmeasured workloads. Its 6 cores and 12 threads provide more parallel processing capacity than the AMD part’s 4 cores and 8 threads. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache is three times larger than the AMD part’s 8 MB. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock is higher than the AMD part’s 4.90 GHz. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes exceeds the AMD part’s Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Its memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, offers broader compatibility than the AMD part’s DDR5-only support. The Intel part also has a larger die at 215 mm² versus 137 mm², and an integrated GPU in the form of UHD Graphics 770 versus the AMD part’s Radeon 740M. However, none of these specification advantages are backed by recorded benchmark results, so their real-world impact remains unverified.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Phoenix2 | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | April 2024 | June 2024 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001189 | Q49KSRNJN |