AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a one-sided comparison in terms of benchmark coverage. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a complete set of measured results across Cinebench and Passmark suites, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has no individual benchmark scores recorded in the database. This absence of data for the Intel processor means that a direct score-for-score comparison cannot be constructed from the available measurements.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12511 and a single-core score of 1766. In Cinebench R20, it delivers 5254 multi-core and 741 single-core. The older R15 workload shows 1260 multi-core and 177 single-core. These results place the processor at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18505.

The Intel Core i5-14501E holds a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmark results. The database lists no nearest rivals for the Intel part, whereas the AMD processor has four comparable CPUs with near-identical average scores. The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE sits within 0.7% of the Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core 7 360, and within 0.1% of the Intel Core i3-14100F. Its average score of 18505 is nearly even with the Intel Core i5-13420H at 18511, a delta of 0%. This cluster of results indicates that the AMD part performs in the same tier as those four Intel models despite the lack of direct head-to-head data against the i5-14501E.

The Passmark suite for the AMD processor shows a multi-thread score of 14403 and a single-thread score of 3828. Integer math reaches 40348, floating point math reaches 25258, and extended instructions reach 12313. Data compression scores 162623, data encryption scores 9224, and random string sorting scores 20134. The physics test records 857, while the find prime numbers test records 52. These figures provide a full profile of the AMD part's compute characteristics, but no equivalent Intel numbers exist to place them against.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix2 codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die measures 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors. The Intel die measures 215 mm², and the database does not record a transistor count for it.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD part provides 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel part provides 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are close, with the AMD at 3.40 GHz and the Intel at 3.30 GHz, but the boost clock favors Intel at 5.20 GHz versus 4.90 GHz for AMD. The AMD processor carries a 35 W TDP, while the Intel processor carries a 65 W TDP.

Cache layouts are structured differently. The AMD part uses 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The Intel part uses 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The Intel L3 capacity is three times the AMD figure, which reflects the larger core count and different design priorities.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, on a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and the database does not record a bandwidth figure. Both parts support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD part uses Radeon 740M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. Socket compatibility is entirely separate: AMD uses Socket AM5, Intel uses Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE boosts to 4.90 GHz, a 0.30 GHz advantage for Intel.

Q: Which processor supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE supports DDR5 only.

Q: What is the L3 cache difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, one-third the Intel capacity.

Q: How do the process nodes differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501E is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Does the database contain benchmark scores for the Intel Core i5-14501E?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE has a full set of Cinebench and Passmark results.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE | Intel Core i5-14501E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Phoenix2 | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 137 mm² | 215 mm² |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not recorded |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 8 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 740M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release date | 2024-04-15 | 2024-06-30 |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 72nd | 50th |

| Average benchmark score | 18505 | 0 |

The two processors share some traits: both are desktop parts, both support ECC memory, both use dual-channel memory buses, both are currently active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Beyond those points, the specification sheets diverge on nearly every major design decision.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between the two processors based on what is actually recorded. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE delivers a complete benchmark profile and a 72nd percentile ranking, with an average score of 18505. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark results, which places it at the 50th percentile by default with an average score of 0. From a measurement standpoint, the AMD processor is the only one of the two with verifiable performance data in the database.

For workloads that depend on single-thread performance, the AMD part records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1766 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3828. Its boost clock of 4.90 GHz supports strong single-core behavior, though the Intel part advertises a higher 5.20 GHz boost. Without Intel benchmark scores, the actual single-core comparison remains unquantified.

For multi-threaded workloads, the AMD processor records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12511 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 14403. The Intel processor offers 6 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads, plus a larger 24 MB L3 cache, which suggests a structural advantage in parallel tasks. But the database contains no measurements to confirm how that advantage translates into real scores.

The choice between the two depends on whether a user requires recorded performance data or raw specifications. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is the only part here with measured results, and those results place it in the same performance tier as several Intel Core i3 models. The Intel Core i5-14501E offers more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, more L3 cache, DDR4 support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, but none of those advantages are backed by benchmark scores in the database. Buyers who prioritize a higher core count, larger cache, and broader memory compatibility would look at the Intel part. Buyers who require verified performance figures and a lower 35 W TDP would look at the AMD part. The recorded data does not settle the performance question between them, because the Intel side has no measurements to compare.