Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14501E and Intel Processor N150 occupy opposite ends of the performance spectrum, and the recorded data reflects a decisive split between the two. The N150 is the only part in this comparison with published benchmark results, so the head-to-head analysis relies on the N150's scores and the architectural differences that separate the two processors.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the N150 records a score of 2590.5. This places it in the 28th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The i5-14501E, by contrast, is listed at the 50th percentile, meaning it sits exactly at the median of all recorded processors. The percentile gap alone indicates a substantial performance difference, but the architectural data makes the magnitude clear.

The i5-14501E uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the N150 uses 4 cores and 4 threads. The i5 also carries a significantly larger cache hierarchy: 24 MB of shared L3 cache versus 6 MB on the N150. The i5's per-core L2 cache is 1.25 MB, while the N150's L2 is 2 MB shared across all cores. The i5's base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz; the N150's base clock is 0.10 GHz with a boost of 3.60 GHz. These figures indicate that the i5 can sustain far higher operating frequencies under load.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the N150 scores 422.5. In single-core, it scores 153.15 in R15 and 935 in R23. These results, combined with the N150's average benchmark score of 1025, place it near several older or lower-tier processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T with an average score of 1024 (0.1% difference), the Intel Core i3-4340 at 1026 (-0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U at 1024 (0.1%), and the Intel Core i7-5650U at 1027 (-0.2%). The N150 is effectively tied with these parts, all within a 0.2% band. This context is important: the N150's performance level is comparable to a decade-old desktop quad-core or a low-power mobile chip.

The i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct numerical comparisons cannot be made. However, the structural differences are overwhelming. The i5 has twice the core count and three times the thread count. Its L3 cache is four times larger. Its boost clock is 1.60 GHz higher. The i5 supports dual-channel memory, while the N150 is single-channel. The i5 uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes; the N150 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes. Every measurable specification favors the i5 by a wide margin.

The N150's TDP is 6 watts, versus 65 watts for the i5. This is not a performance metric, but it explains the intended use cases. The N150 is a low-power mobile processor; the i5 is a desktop part. The benchmark data shows the N150 performing at a level consistent with its low-power design, while the i5's specifications suggest it should far exceed those numbers if benchmarked.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14501E is the stronger processor by every architectural and specification-based measure. It has more cores, more threads, higher clock speeds, more cache, wider memory support, and a more capable PCIe implementation. The N150's recorded Cinebench scores place it at the 28th percentile, while the i5 sits at the 50th percentile. The N150's nearest rivals are all processors with average scores around 1024 to 1027, and the N150's average score of 1025 puts it squarely in that group. The i5, with no recorded scores but with double the cores and triple the threads, should be expected to outperform the N150 by a significant margin in multi-threaded workloads.

The N150 is a 4-core, 4-thread processor with a 6 MB L3 cache and a 3.60 GHz boost clock. The i5 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 24 MB L3 cache and a 5.20 GHz boost clock. In single-threaded tasks, the i5's 1.60 GHz higher boost clock gives it a clear advantage. In multi-threaded tasks, the i5's thread count advantage (12 versus 4) compounds with its larger cache and higher clocks. The i5 also supports dual-channel memory, which benefits memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads, while the N150 is limited to single-channel.

The verdict is straightforward: the i5-14501E is the higher-performance part. The N150's only advantage is its 6-watt TDP, which makes it suitable for fanless or ultra-low-power designs. For any compute-intensive application, the i5 is the appropriate choice. For extremely power-constrained embedded or mobile scenarios, the N150 may be sufficient.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins in almost every performance category. Its 6 cores and 12 threads provide strong multi-threaded throughput for rendering, compilation, and productivity workloads. Its 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock delivers high single-thread performance for applications that rely on one or two cores. Its dual-channel memory bus doubles the available memory bandwidth compared to the N150's single-channel bus. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes allows for high-speed storage and graphics connectivity. Its support for ECC memory makes it suitable for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

The Intel Processor N150 wins in power efficiency. Its 6-watt TDP is dramatically lower than the i5's 65 watts. It supports LPDDR5 memory in addition to DDR4 and DDR5, which is common in low-power mobile designs. Its BGA 1264 socket indicates a soldered, compact form factor suitable for small devices. Its 4 cores and 4 threads are adequate for basic tasks like web browsing, document editing, and light media playback. Its integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides display output without a discrete GPU.

The benchmark data shows the N150's multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 2590.5 and single-core score of 935. These numbers are consistent with entry-level productivity. The i5, with its superior specifications, would be expected to deliver multiple times that performance, though no direct score is recorded. The use-case split is therefore clear: the i5 for desktop computing that demands performance, the N150 for low-power mobile or embedded systems where efficiency is paramount.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the cache sizes for each processor?

A: The i5-14501E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The N150 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The N150 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory in a single-channel configuration.

Q: How does the N150's benchmark performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The N150 has an average benchmark score of 1025. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T (1024, 0.1% difference), the Intel Core i3-4340 (1026, -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (1024, 0.1%), and the Intel Core i7-5650U (1027, -0.2%). All are within a 0.2% band.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts. The N150 has a TDP of 6 watts.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: The i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The N150 does not support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-14501E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and is part of the Core 14th Gen series. It uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The die size is 215 mm². The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is designed for the desktop market segment. It was released on 2024-06-30. The part number is Q49HSRNJM. The multiplier is locked, meaning it cannot be overclocked via the multiplier.

The Intel Processor N150 is built on the Twin Lake architecture and is listed under the Intel Processor generation, with a codename that references Alder Lake-N. It also uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The die size is not recorded. The processor uses Intel BGA 1264, a soldered mobile socket. It is designed for the mobile market segment. It was released on 2024-11-19. The part number is SRPNR. The multiplier is also locked.

The core configurations differ substantially. The i5 has 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating Hyper-Threading support. The N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads, with no simultaneous multithreading. The i5's L1 cache is 80 KB per core, while the N150's L1 is 96 KB per core. The i5's L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, while the N150's L2 is 2 MB shared. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared on the i5 versus 6 MB shared on the N150.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The i5 has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The N150 has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The base clock of 0.10 GHz is unusually low, indicating a design that relies heavily on boost behavior for performance.

Memory support also differs. The i5 supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The N150 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 in a single-channel configuration. The N150 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The i5's memory bandwidth is not recorded. ECC memory is supported on the i5 but not on the N150.

PCIe capabilities differ. The i5 uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The N150 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only). This gives the i5 a substantial advantage in bandwidth for storage and graphics.

Integrated graphics differ. The i5 includes UHD Graphics 770. The N150 includes UHD Graphics 730. Both are integrated, but the i5's implementation is paired with a higher-performance CPU.

The production status for both is Active. Both processors are currently in production. The i5 is a desktop part with a 65-watt TDP; the N150 is a mobile part with a 6-watt TDP. The i5's socket 1700 allows for socketed installation and upgrade, while the N150's BGA 1264 is soldered to the motherboard. These architectural differences explain the performance gap and the intended use cases for each processor.