Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

The two processors occupy different tiers of Intel’s desktop lineup. The Core i5-14501E is a 14th Gen part built on Raptor Lake for Socket 1700, with 6 cores and 12 threads. The Core Ultra 7 265KF belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, uses Arrow Lake on Socket 1851, and offers 20 cores with 20 threads. The recorded data shows a substantial performance gap, with the Ultra 7 265KF achieving an average benchmark score of 71910 compared to the i5-14501E’s average score of 0. The Ultra 7 265KF also sits at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the i5-14501E is at the 50th percentile. This split suggests the two chips serve different workloads, though only the Ultra 7 265KF has recorded benchmark entries in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark distribution is entirely one-sided in the recorded data. The Core Ultra 7 265KF has a full suite of benchmark results across rendering, general compute, and specialized workload tests. The Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmarks, so it cannot claim any measured wins in the database. The Ultra 7 265KF’s wins span single-core and multi-core tests alike, which indicates it is competitive in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded scenarios.

The Ultra 7 265KF’s strength appears in multi-core oriented workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22913 reflect a processor that can handle parallel tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 58518 reinforces that pattern. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2759. This combination means the Ultra 7 265KF does not sacrifice single-core responsiveness while delivering high multi-core throughput.

The i5-14501E, by contrast, has no benchmark data to analyze. The database shows its average benchmark score as 0 and lists no tests. That absence prevents any quantitative comparison of its wins. The only information available for the i5-14501E is its specification profile and its 50th percentile ranking. The percentile figure suggests it sits near the middle of the performance distribution, but without measured scores, the data cannot confirm where it wins.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and manufacturing approaches. The i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with the die size listed at 215 mm². The Ultra 7 265KF uses Arrow Lake, codenamed Arrow Lake-S, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process, with a die size of 243 mm² and 17,800 million transistors. The process node difference is significant: 10 nm versus 3 nm indicates a major generational shift in manufacturing.

Core configuration also differs sharply. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads. The thread count equality with core count on the Ultra 7 265KF indicates it uses a design without hyperthreading on its cores, or a hybrid layout that does not double thread counts. The i5-14501E’s 12 threads from 6 cores implies simultaneous multithreading is active. Cache hierarchies differ as well. The i5-14501E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 7 265KF has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core caches on the Ultra 7 265KF align with its newer architecture.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Ultra 7 265KF supports only DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The Ultra 7 265KF has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14501E has no bandwidth figure listed. ECC memory support is present on the i5-14501E but absent on the Ultra 7 265KF. PCIe connectivity also differs: the i5-14501E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the Ultra 7 265KF provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics, while the i5-14501E includes UHD Graphics 770.

The Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the i5-14501E does not. That makes the Ultra 7 265KF the only one of the two with overclocking flexibility. The sockets are incompatible, with the i5-14501E on Intel Socket 1700 and the Ultra 7 265KF on Intel Socket 1851. The release dates differ by several months, with the i5-14501E listed as 2024-06-30 and the Ultra 7 265KF as 2024-10-23. The Ultra 7 265KF has a launch MSRP of $379, which can be stated once.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair, so all comparisons rely on the Ultra 7 265KF’s recorded scores. The i5-14501E has no measured results, meaning there are no exact delta values between the two. The nearest rivals for the Ultra 7 265KF provide context for its performance level. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX scores 71797, which is 0.2% below the Ultra 7 265KF’s 71910 average. The Intel Xeon 6517P scores 72350, which is 0.6% above. The Intel Xeon 6724P scores 72396, which is 0.7% above. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 71370, which is 0.8% below.

Within the Ultra 7 265KF’s own benchmark suite, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 stands out as the highest rendering result. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20889 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5013 show a consistent scaling pattern. Single-core results in the same series are 7021 in R23, 2948 in R20, and 707 in R15. Geekbench results show 22913 multi-core and 2759 single-core. PassMark tests cover a range of tasks: integer math scores 143351, floating point math scores 189431, data compression scores 666589, data encryption scores 48198, extended instructions score 54513, random string sorting scores 79735, and find prime numbers scores 486. The PassMark single-thread score is 4928, and the physics score is 3633.

The i5-14501E’s lack of benchmark scores means the database cannot quantify how much faster the Ultra 7 265KF is in any specific test. The percentile gap is the only comparative signal: 94th versus 50th. That gap implies the Ultra 7 265KF sits far above the i5-14501E in overall performance, but the exact margin remains unmeasured in the recorded data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores.

Q: Does the Core i5-14501E support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Ultra 7 265KF supports only DDR5.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The i5-14501E uses Intel’s 10 nm process, and the Ultra 7 265KF uses TSMC’s 3 nm process.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 7 265KF overclockable?

A: Yes, the Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier. The i5-14501E does not.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The i5-14501E includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. The Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics.

Q: How does the Ultra 7 265KF compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ultra 7 265KF’s average benchmark score of 71910 is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, 0.8% above the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, 0.6% below the Intel Xeon 6517P, and 0.7% below the Intel Xeon 6724P.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ across nearly every major specification field. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads; the Ultra 7 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 3.30 GHz for the i5-14501E and 3.90 GHz for the Ultra 7 265KF. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 5.50 GHz, respectively. TDP is 65 watts for the i5-14501E and 125 watts for the Ultra 7 265KF. The i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 7 265KF uses Intel Socket 1851. The i5-14501E runs Raptor Lake on a 10 nm Intel process with a 215 mm² die. The Ultra 7 265KF runs Arrow Lake on a 3 nm TSMC process with a 243 mm² die and 17,800 million transistors.

Cache values diverge: the i5-14501E has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The Ultra 7 265KF has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: DDR4 and DDR5 for the i5-14501E, DDR5 only for the Ultra 7 265KF. The Ultra 7 265KF has a listed memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s; the i5-14501E has none. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14501E but not on the Ultra 7 265KF. PCIe lane counts are 16 for the i5-14501E and 20 for the Ultra 7 265KF, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are present on the i5-14501E as UHD Graphics 770, absent on the Ultra 7 265KF. The multiplier is locked on the i5-14501E and unlocked on the Ultra 7 265KF. Release dates are 2024-06-30 for the i5-14501E and 2024-10-23 for the Ultra 7 265KF.

The Verdict

The data points to the Core Ultra 7 265KF as the stronger processor by a wide margin, based on its benchmark presence and 94th percentile ranking. The i5-14501E has no recorded scores, so any selection between the two must rely on what the database actually shows. The Ultra 7 265KF delivers high multi-core throughput with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 22913. Its single-core results, including a Geekbench single-core score of 2759, indicate it also handles lightly threaded tasks effectively. The 20-core configuration and 30 MB of shared L3 give it a clear advantage in parallel workloads.

The i5-14501E offers features the Ultra 7 265KF lacks, such as ECC memory support, integrated graphics, and DDR4 compatibility. Its 65 watt TDP suggests lower power demand, though the database does not provide measured power figures. The 50th percentile ranking places it near the middle of the performance distribution, but without benchmarks, the data cannot confirm its actual capabilities. Users who need ECC memory or integrated graphics would find the i5-14501E more aligned with those requirements. Users who prioritize raw compute performance, as measured by the Ultra 7 265KF’s extensive benchmark suite, would choose the Ultra 7 265KF. The recorded data does not support any other conclusion.