Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX

The Intel Core i5-14501E and Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX occupy different ends of the performance spectrum, with the database showing a decisive advantage for the Ultra 7 part across every recorded benchmark. The i5-14501E, a desktop Raptor Lake Refresh chip with 6 cores and 12 threads, sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Ultra 7 265HX, a mobile Arrow Lake-HX processor with 20 cores and 20 threads, ranks at the 93rd percentile. The Ultra 7 also carries an average benchmark score of 63173, placing it within 0.7% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13790F, and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G. The i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores or rival comparisons in the database, making direct numerical comparisons impossible, but the architectural and specification gaps are substantial.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has 20 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX boosts to 5.30 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz. The difference is 0.10 GHz.

Q: What process nodes do these processors use?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E uses a 10 nm node from Intel. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX uses a 3 nm node from TSMC.

Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX supports only DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor includes ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the market segments for these two processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 2114.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX wins in every measured category because the database records no benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14501E. The Ultra 7’s recorded scores span Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests, plus PassMark workloads including integer math, floating-point math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, multithread performance, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. For example, the Ultra 7 scores 40642 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5737 in Cinebench R23 single-core. It also achieves 126954 in PassMark integer math, 161605 in PassMark floating-point math, and 47985 in PassMark multithread. These numbers place the Ultra 7 at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, a position far above the i5-14501E’s 50th percentile.

The Intel Core i5-14501E does not have any recorded wins because no benchmark scores exist for it in the database. Its strengths must be inferred from its specifications: a 65 W TDP, DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, ECC memory capability, and a desktop socket with 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The Ultra 7, by contrast, has a 55 W TDP, DDR5-only support, no ECC, and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The i5-14501E’s lower core count and older architecture suggest it would not compete with the Ultra 7 in multi-threaded workloads based on the available data.

For use cases, the Ultra 7’s benchmark scores indicate strong multi-core and single-core performance across rendering, encryption, and math-heavy tasks. The i5-14501E, with only 6 cores and 12 threads, likely targets lighter desktop workloads where its 65 W TDP and ECC support matter more than raw throughput, but the database does not provide scores to confirm this.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from separate Intel architectures. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry. Its die size is 215 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX uses Arrow Lake, specifically Arrow Lake-HX, built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC. Its die size is 243 mm², and it integrates 17,800 million transistors.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The i5-14501E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7’s larger per-core caches and higher total L3 capacity align with its higher core count and newer design.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 7 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The Ultra 7’s graphics solution is newer and more capable on paper, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded in the database.

Memory support diverges. The i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, indicating a backward-compatible desktop design. The Ultra 7 supports only DDR5 and has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, a figure not listed for the i5-14501E. ECC memory is available on the i5-14501E but not on the Ultra 7.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The i5-14501E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Ultra 7’s extra four lanes could benefit multi-GPU or high-bandwidth storage configurations, but the i5-14501E’s desktop socket allows for more flexible board-level expansion.

Production status is active for both, but the release dates show the i5-14501E launching on 2024-06-30 and the Ultra 7 launching on 2025-01-12. The multiplier is locked on the i5-14501E and unlocked on the Ultra 7, meaning the Ultra 7 allows overclocking while the i5-14501E does not.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ: 6 cores and 12 threads for the i5-14501E versus 20 cores and 20 threads for the Ultra 7. The Ultra 7 also has no hyper-threading, matching its thread count to its core count. Base clocks are 3.30 GHz for the i5-14501E and 2.60 GHz for the Ultra 7, while boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 5.30 GHz, respectively. The i5-14501E starts higher but peaks lower.

TDP values are 65 W for the i5-14501E and 55 W for the Ultra 7, despite the Ultra 7 having more than three times the cores. The sockets are not interchangeable: Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop i5-14501E, Intel BGA 2114 for the mobile Ultra 7.

Process node and foundry differ, as noted: 10 nm Intel versus 3 nm TSMC. Transistor count is only listed for the Ultra 7 at 17,800 million, with no figure for the i5-14501E. Die size is 215 mm² for the i5-14501E and 243 mm² for the Ultra 7.

Memory support: the i5-14501E accepts DDR4 and DDR5, the Ultra 7 accepts only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Ultra 7 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the i5-14501E has no such figure. ECC support exists only on the i5-14501E.

PCIe lanes: 16 Gen 5 lanes for the i5-14501E, 20 Gen 5 lanes for the Ultra 7. Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 770 versus Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The i5-14501E has a locked multiplier; the Ultra 7 has an unlocked multiplier. Part numbers are Q49HSRNJM for the i5-14501E and SRVFH for the Ultra 7.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark list is empty in the database, and the Intel Core i5-14501E has zero recorded benchmark scores. As a result, no direct numerical comparison is possible between the two chips. However, the Ultra 7’s individual scores provide a reference point for its performance level. In Cinebench R15, the Ultra 7 scores 4096 multi-core and 578 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 17069 multi-core and 2409 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 40642 multi-core and 5737 single-core.

PassMark results for the Ultra 7 include data compression at 511817, data encryption at 39472, extended instructions at 40741, find prime numbers at 406, floating-point math at 161605, integer math at 126954, multithread at 47985, physics at 2978, random string sorting at 62458, and single-thread at 4500.

The i5-14501E’s absence from the benchmark database means it cannot be placed against the Ultra 7 in any workload. The Ultra 7’s percentile rank of 93 versus the i5-14501E’s percentile rank of 50 indicates a wide gap in overall performance, but the lack of i5-14501E scores prevents a precise delta. The nearest rivals for the Ultra 7 all fall within a narrow band: the Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63080, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63331, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62839, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62738. The Ultra 7’s average score of 63173 sits between these values, confirming consistent performance near the top of its class.

For the i5-14501E, the database shows no benchmarks, no average score, and no rivals. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is an average performer among all CPUs, but the specific workloads where it might excel, such as ECC-enabled memory operations or DDR4 compatibility, are not quantified.

The Verdict

The recorded data points decisively toward the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX for any workload that benefits from high core counts, large caches, and modern architecture. Its 20 cores, 30 MB of L3 cache, 3 nm TSMC process, and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support a 93rd percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 63173. The Ultra 7’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40642 and single-core score of 5737 indicate strong performance in rendering and single-threaded tasks alike. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, sit within 0.7% and 0.2% respectively, showing that the Ultra 7 competes at the top of the mobile processor segment.

The Intel Core i5-14501E, with 6 cores, 12 threads, a 10 nm Intel process, and a 50th percentile rank, lacks any recorded benchmark evidence to challenge the Ultra 7. Its advantages are limited to ECC memory support, DDR4 compatibility, a lower base clock, and a desktop socket with an active production status. For users who require ECC memory or prefer a desktop platform with DDR4 support, the i5-14501E offers those specific features. For users who need raw compute, the Ultra 7 delivers, as shown by its 161605 floating-point math score, 126954 integer math score, and 47985 multithread score.

The verdict is straightforward: the Ultra 7 265HX is the superior processor by every measured metric in the database. The i5-14501E is a viable desktop option only for scenarios where ECC memory or DDR4 support are mandatory, since its performance class is far below the Ultra 7 based on percentile ranking. The Ultra 7’s unlocked multiplier and 55 W TDP also make it more flexible for overclocking and mobile deployment, while the i5-14501E’s locked multiplier and higher TDP limit its appeal. The data shows no scenario where the i5-14501E outranks the Ultra 7 in recorded benchmarks, so the choice depends entirely on platform requirements rather than performance expectations.