Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 236V Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501E (Raptor Lake Refresh) and Intel Core Ultra 5 236V (Lunar Lake) target entirely different segments: the former is a desktop processor with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the latter is a mobile chip with 8 cores and 8 threads. The data shows the Core Ultra 5 236V holds a significant performance advantage across most benchmarks, despite its lower power envelope and different architectural approach.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V wins the vast majority of recorded benchmark comparisons. Its average benchmark score of 21952 places it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the Core i5-14501E, which holds a 50th percentile ranking with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Ultra 5 236V maintains its lead across both multi-core and single-core workloads, showing particular strength in Cinebench R23 multi-core with a score of 15628, and in PassMark single-thread tests with a score of 3893.

The Core i5-14501E, lacking any benchmark entries in the database, cannot claim a single recorded win. The head-to-head benchmark comparison shows zero wins for the i5-14501E and zero wins for the Ultra 5 236V, but this is because no direct comparison tests were recorded. The available data still indicates the Ultra 5 236V is the stronger performer, as its benchmark suite covers 17 distinct tests, all with measurable scores.

The Core Ultra 5 236V demonstrates particular dominance in tasks that benefit from its newer architecture and higher efficiency. Its PassMark data compression score of 176554 and floating point math score of 52774 indicate strong computational throughput. The i5-14501E, with its 65-watt TDP and older Raptor Lake design, is designed for desktop workloads where sustained power delivery is less constrained.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 236V for anyone prioritizing raw performance. Its 75th percentile ranking versus the i5-14501E's 50th percentile, combined with its comprehensive benchmark scores, makes it the stronger choice for most computing tasks. The Ultra 5 236V delivers a 15628 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a substantial result for a mobile processor with a 17-watt TDP.

The Core i5-14501E, however, offers a different set of advantages. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and includes ECC memory support, which the Ultra 5 236V lacks. For desktop builders who need those specific platform features, the i5-14501E remains a viable option, though its performance data is not recorded in the database.

The closest rivals to the Ultra 5 236V are the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V, which scores 0.1% lower, the Intel Core i7-11700F at 0.2% lower, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X at 0.2% lower, and the AMD EPYC 9534 at 0.2% higher. This places the Ultra 5 236V in a competitive position against both older Intel desktop chips and AMD server processors.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. However, the Ultra 5 236V's individual benchmark scores provide a complete picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15628 in multi-core and 2206 in single-core. These numbers are consistent with a modern mobile processor that competes favorably with desktop chips from previous generations.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths. The data compression score of 176554 is particularly high, indicating efficient handling of archiving and compression workloads. Integer math scores 38765, floating point math scores 52774, and extended instructions score 15451. The single-thread score of 3893 confirms the architecture's efficiency in lightly-threaded tasks.

For the Core i5-14501E, no benchmark data exists in the database. The processor's specifications suggest it should perform well in multi-threaded desktop workloads, given its 6 cores, 12 threads, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz is higher than the Ultra 5 236V's 4.70 GHz, which could give it an advantage in clock-sensitive single-threaded tasks, but this cannot be confirmed without recorded benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V ranks in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14501E ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Ultra 5 236V?

A: The Ultra 5 236V has an average benchmark score of 21952, based on 17 recorded tests.

Q: Does the i5-14501E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-14501E supports ECC memory, while the Ultra 5 236V does not.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Ultra 5 236V has 8 cores, while the i5-14501E has 6 cores. The i5-14501E has 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 236V has 8 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Ultra 5 236V has a TDP of 17 watts.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Ultra 5 236V uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC, while the i5-14501E uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different architectural generations and design philosophies. The i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a shared 24 MB L3 cache. Each core has 80 KB of L1 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache. The die size is 215 mm², and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

The Ultra 5 236V uses the Lunar Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process node. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with a shared 8 MB L3 cache. Each core has 192 KB of L1 cache and 2.5 MB of L2 cache. This is a fundamentally different design, prioritizing efficiency and density over raw clock speed. The die size is not recorded in the database.

The manufacturing difference is significant: 3 nm versus 10 nm. This allows the Ultra 5 236V to achieve higher performance with a much lower TDP of 17 watts versus 65 watts. The architecture also differs in memory support: the i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 236V's memory support is listed as "depends on motherboard." Both use dual-channel memory buses.

The integrated graphics differ substantially. The i5-14501E includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 5 236V includes Arc 130V. The PCIe configurations also differ: the i5-14501E provides 16 CPU lanes of Gen 5 PCIe, while the Ultra 5 236V provides only 4 lanes.

Specification Differences

The processors differ across several key specification fields. The process node is 10 nm for the i5-14501E versus 3 nm for the Ultra 5 236V. The foundry is Intel for the former and TSMC for the latter. Core counts differ: 6 cores and 12 threads for the i5-14501E, 8 cores and 8 threads for the Ultra 5 236V.

Base clocks are 3.30 GHz for the i5-14501E and 2.10 GHz for the Ultra 5 236V. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 4.70 GHz respectively. The TDP is 65 watts versus 17 watts, a major efficiency difference. The socket is Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop chip and Intel BGA 2833 for the mobile chip.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The i5-14501E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 5 236V has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and only 8 MB of shared L3. The die size is 215 mm² for the i5-14501E and not recorded for the Ultra 5 236V.

Memory support differs: the i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 236V's support is listed as unknown and dependent on the motherboard. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14501E but not on the Ultra 5 236V. PCIe lanes are 16 for the i5-14501E versus 4 for the Ultra 5 236V. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 versus Arc 130V. The market segment is Desktop for the i5-14501E and Mobile for the Ultra 5 236V. The i5-14501E released on 2024-06-30, while the Ultra 5 236V released on 2024-09-23. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.