Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235A Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235A

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains comprehensive benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores in this dataset. This immediately establishes the Core Ultra 5 235A as the measured performer, with its average benchmark score of 48201 placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The i5-14501E, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking but lacks any supporting performance data.

Focusing on the Core Ultra 5 235A's recorded results, the Cinebench suite shows a multicore score of 32633 in R23, paired with a single-core score of 4607 in the same test. In Cinebench R20, the multicore result drops to 13705, while single-core reaches 1934. The older R15 test shows 3289 multicore and 464 single-core. These figures demonstrate a strong balance between multi-threaded throughput and single-thread responsiveness.

PassMark results for the Core Ultra 5 235A further detail its capabilities. The multithread score sits at 38392, while single-thread performance is recorded at 4557. Integer math reaches 88626, floating point math hits 118778, and extended instructions score 31625. Data compression completes at 393800, data encryption at 30136, and random string sorting at 49489. The physics test scores 2437, and prime number finding scores 392.

Because the i5-14501E has no benchmark entries, there are no direct head-to-head deltas to calculate. The comparison must rely on architectural specifications and the known performance class of the Core Ultra 5 235A. The 235A's 90th percentile standing indicates it outperforms the vast majority of processors, while the 14501E's 50th percentile suggests median positioning, though this ranking is not backed by measured scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and designs. The Intel Core i5-14501E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Core Ultra 5 235A is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, using Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename, manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. This process difference is significant: the 235A uses a more advanced node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, while the 14501E uses a larger 10 nm process on a 215 mm² die.

Core counts differ substantially. The i5-14501E provides 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating hyperthreading support. The Core Ultra 5 235A provides 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not use hyperthreading but compensates with more physical cores. Cache configurations also diverge. The 14501E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The 235A has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and the same 24 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core caches on the 235A should improve data locality and reduce memory latency.

Clock speeds show a tradeoff. The i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 235A has a slightly higher base clock of 3.40 GHz but a lower boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Both processors have a 65 W TDP and are locked, meaning the multiplier is not unlocked for overclocking.

Memory support differs. The i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. The Core Ultra 5 235A supports only DDR5 in dual-channel, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it lacks ECC support. The 235A offers more PCIe lanes with Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only), compared to the 14501E's Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 235A features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU. The sockets are incompatible: the 14501E uses Intel Socket 1700, and the 235A uses Intel Socket 1851. Release dates also separate them, with the 14501E launching on 2024-06-30 and the 235A on 2025-07-28.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 235A wins on raw multi-threaded performance potential. Its 14 physical cores versus the 14501E's 6 cores with 12 threads gives it a substantial advantage in workloads that scale with core count. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32633 confirms this strength, as does the PassMark multithread score of 38392. Tasks like video rendering, 3D simulation, and software compilation would benefit from this core advantage.

The 235A also wins on architectural efficiency. The 3 nm TSMC process node, larger per-core caches (192 KB L1 and 3 MB L2), and higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s position it as the more modern design. The transistor count of 17,800 million indicates a dense, capable chip. Its 90th percentile ranking across all CPUs places it in the upper tier of available processors.

The i5-14501E holds advantages in specific areas, though these are not backed by benchmark scores. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz is higher than the 235A's 5.00 GHz, which could favor lightly threaded workloads if the architecture scales comparably. The 14501E supports DDR4 memory, which allows for lower-cost system builds using existing memory. It also includes ECC memory support, a feature absent from the 235A, making it relevant for error-sensitive computing environments. The 10 nm process and smaller die size may also translate to different thermal characteristics, though no thermal data is recorded.

The 235A's single-core performance is well documented. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4607 and PassMark single-thread score of 4557 show strong per-thread execution. The 14501E has no comparable data, so its single-thread capability cannot be quantified against the 235A.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly favors the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A. It has measured benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites, a 90th percentile standing among all CPUs, and an average benchmark score of 48201. It delivers 14 cores, a modern 3 nm process, 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, and a newer integrated graphics solution with Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU. For workloads that utilize multiple cores, the 235A is the stronger choice based on the evidence.

The Intel Core i5-14501E remains an unmeasured quantity. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests mid-tier performance, but no benchmark scores exist to confirm this. Its advantages are spec-based: higher boost clock at 5.20 GHz, DDR4 compatibility, ECC memory support, and a 24 MB L3 cache that matches the 235A. These features make it suitable for specific use cases where ECC is required or where DDR4 memory is preferred, but its performance cannot be verified from this dataset.

The Core Ultra 5 235A also carries a launch MSRP of $269, which is the only pricing information available. The i5-14501E has no recorded launch MSRP. The 235A's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 with an average score of 48171 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX at 48287 with a delta of -0.2%, the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48470 with a delta of -0.6%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 at 47918 with a delta of 0.6%. These close margins indicate the 235A sits in a competitive performance band.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A has 14 cores and 14 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-14501E has ECC memory support. The Core Ultra 5 235A does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the boost clock of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235A is at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14501E is at the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A supports only DDR5 memory.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14501E | Intel Core Ultra 5 235A |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Core 14th Gen | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Arrow Lake-S |

| Generation | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 243 mm² |

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 14 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2025-07-28 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $269 |

| Part Number | Q49HSRNJM | SRWPN |