Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Comparison
Intel Core i5-14501E
Core Ultra 5 226V
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V shows a consistent pattern across synthetic workloads, with no direct benchmark scores available for the Intel Core i5-14501E in the database. The Core Ultra 5 226V delivers an average benchmark score of 19368, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs tracked. This is a strong result for a mobile processor, though direct head-to-head comparisons with the i5-14501E cannot be made from the available measurements.
The Core Ultra 5 226V achieves 9848 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 6381 points in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 1501 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core results are equally consistent: 1744 in R23, 900 in R20, and 267 in R15. Geekbench scores reach 8598 multi-core and 1930 single-core. Passmark results show 17850 in multithread, 3754 in single-thread, 52270 in floating point math, and 38647 in integer math.
Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 5 226V sits within a narrow band. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS matches it at a 0% delta with an average score of 19364. The Intel Core i5-1345U is 0.2% behind, the Intel Core i7-10700F is 0.7% behind, and the Intel Core i7-8700K is 0.7% ahead. This indicates the 226V performs at a level comparable to mid-range desktop processors from previous generations, despite being a 17 W mobile part.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies within Intel's lineup. The Core i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with base and boost clocks of 3.30 GHz and 5.20 GHz respectively. The Core Ultra 5 226V uses Lunar Lake architecture on TSMC's 3 nm node, with 8 cores and 8 threads, clocked at 2.10 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost.
Cache hierarchies diverge sharply. The i5-14501E provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 5 226V provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 8 MB of shared L3. The desktop part carries more total cache, while the mobile part uses larger per-core allocations.
The i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The 226V's memory support is listed as dependent on motherboard, also dual-channel, but without ECC support. PCIe connectivity differs: the i5-14501E offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the 226V offers Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the 226V uses Intel BGA 2833, reflecting the desktop versus mobile market segments. Integrated graphics also differ: UHD Graphics 770 on the i5-14501E versus Arc 130V on the 226V. The 226V was released on 2024-09-23, later than the i5-14501E's 2024-06-30 release date.
The Verdict
The data shows two processors with distinct roles. The Core i5-14501E targets desktop systems with a 65 W TDP, high boost clocks, and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for expansion. The Core Ultra 5 226V targets mobile devices with a 17 W TDP, 8 cores, and a 3 nm process node for efficiency. For users who need a socketed desktop part with ECC memory support and high single-thread clock speeds, the i5-14501E is the appropriate choice from the recorded specifications. For users who prioritize a compact, low-power mobile processor with strong multi-threaded performance in a small thermal envelope, the 226V is the option supported by the benchmark data.
The 226V's 73rd percentile ranking and average score of 19368 indicate it competes favorably with previous-generation desktop CPUs like the Intel Core i7-8700K, which sits 0.7% ahead. The i5-14501E has no recorded benchmarks or rival comparisons in the database, so its performance relative to the 226V cannot be quantified. The verdict must rest on the available facts: the 226V is a measured performer in the database, while the i5-14501E is defined only by its specifications.
Specification Differences
| Field | Intel Core i5-14501E | Intel Core Ultra 5 226V |
|-------|----------------------|-------------------------|
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.50 GHz |
| TDP | 65 W | 17 W |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Lunar Lake |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| Die Size | 215 mm² | Not recorded |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | Depends on motherboard |
| ECC Memory | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 (Gen 5) | 4 (Gen 5) |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc 130V |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-09-23 |
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores.
Q: How do the boost clocks compare?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the Core Ultra 5 226V's 4.50 GHz boost clock.
Q: Does the Core i5-14501E support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The Core Ultra 5 226V does not support ECC memory.
Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?
A: The i5-14501E has a 65 W TDP, while the 226V has a 17 W TDP, making the 226V considerably more power-efficient.
Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?
A: The Core Ultra 5 226V uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, while the i5-14501E uses Intel's 10 nm process.
Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 226V rank among all CPUs?
A: The 226V sits at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19368.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i5-14501E wins on raw clock speed and expansion capability. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock is 0.70 GHz higher than the 226V's 4.50 GHz, which matters for lightly threaded workloads that depend on single-core frequency. The 65 W TDP and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes suit desktop builds with discrete graphics, high-speed storage, and add-in cards. ECC memory support makes it viable for error-sensitive computing environments. The 24 MB shared L3 cache provides a larger pool for frequently accessed data across all cores.
The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V wins on core count, efficiency, and measured performance. Its 8 cores exceed the i5-14501E's 6 cores, and the 17 W TDP indicates substantially lower power draw, which is critical for laptops and compact systems. The 3 nm TSMC process node allows this efficiency while maintaining competitive performance. The recorded benchmarks show the 226V achieves a 73rd percentile ranking, with an average score of 19368 that places it alongside desktop CPUs like the Intel Core i7-8700K (0.7% ahead) and the Intel Core i7-10700F (0.7% behind). The 226V also provides more L1 and L2 cache per core, which can benefit per-thread working sets.
The integrated graphics differ significantly: the 226V uses Arc 130V, while the i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770. The 226V's mobile design includes a die size not recorded in the database, while the i5-14501E measures 215 mm². For workloads that require sustained multi-threaded throughput in a low-power envelope, the 226V's benchmark results and 8-core configuration make it the stronger candidate. For workloads that require maximum clock speed, desktop expandability, and ECC memory, the i5-14501E's specifications provide the necessary features. The choice depends entirely on whether the platform is a desktop workstation or a mobile system, as the sockets, TDPs, and PCIe lane counts are not interchangeable.