Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts differ between the Intel Core i5-14501E and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F?

A: The Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225F has 10 cores and 10 threads. This means the Ultra 5 has more physical cores, but the i5-14501E supports hyper-threading, giving it two extra logical threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?

A: The Core i5-14501E boosts up to 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the Core Ultra 5 225F's maximum boost of 4.90 GHz. Both processors have the same 3.30 GHz base clock.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225F sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Core i5-14501E is at the 50th percentile. The Ultra 5's average benchmark score is 37,313, whereas the i5-14501E has an average benchmark score of 0 in the recorded data.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F does not.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225F is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the Core i5-14501E uses Intel's 10 nm process. The Ultra 5 also has a larger transistor count of 17,800 million compared to the i5-14501E, for which the transistor count is not recorded.

Q: Which processor uses a newer socket?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225F uses Intel Socket 1851, whereas the Core i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700. The Ultra 5 also supports more PCIe lanes, with Gen 5 and 20 lanes, compared to Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the i5-14501E.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent distinct architectural generations from Intel. The Intel Core i5-14501E is built on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 and uses the Arrow Lake architecture, codenamed Arrow Lake-S. This is not a simple incremental refresh; the underlying design philosophy differs significantly between the two.

The fabrication process is a major divider. The Core Ultra 5 225F is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the Core i5-14501E uses Intel's 10 nm process. The die size also differs, with the Ultra 5 measuring 243 mm² and the i5-14501E measuring 215 mm². The transistor count for the Ultra 5 is recorded at 17,800 million, while no transistor count is available for the i5-14501E in the database.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently as well. The Core i5-14501E has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core and an L2 cache of 1.25 MB per core, with a shared L3 cache of 24 MB. The Core Ultra 5 225F has a larger L1 cache at 192 KB per core and a larger L2 cache at 3 MB per core, but its shared L3 cache is smaller at 20 MB. The larger per-core caches on the Ultra 5 align with its higher physical core count and newer architecture.

Memory support also separates the two. The Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 5 225F supports only DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the Ultra 5 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, a figure not listed for the i5-14501E. The i5-14501E includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770, whereas the Core Ultra 5 225F has no integrated graphics, designated as N/A. ECC memory support is present on the i5-14501E but absent on the Ultra 5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F is extensive, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries in the database. As a result, the comparison is one-sided: the Ultra 5 has measurable scores across multiple tests, and the i5-14501E has none to match.

In Cinebench tests, the Core Ultra 5 225F scores 2,660 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 287 in single-core. Moving to Cinebench R20, it delivers 11,059 in multi-core and 1,561 in single-core. Cinebench R23 results show 16,467 in multi-core and 1,893 in single-core. These figures establish a baseline for the Ultra 5's rendering performance, but without corresponding i5-14501E scores, direct head-to-head deltas cannot be calculated.

PassMark results for the Core Ultra 5 225F cover a range of workloads. It scores 310,843 in data compression, 22,648 in data encryption, and 28,027 in extended instructions. Prime number finding yields 352, floating point math scores 92,554, and integer math scores 66,417. The multithread score is 31,004, physics scores 2,430, and random string sorting scores 37,325. Single-thread performance is recorded at 4,397.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 5 225F provide context for its average score of 37,313. The Intel Core i9-13900HK has an average score of 37,425, putting it 0.3% ahead of the Ultra 5. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37,161, which is 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i7-13700 scores 37,135, also 0.4% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37,117, 0.5% behind. These narrow deltas indicate the Ultra 5 sits in a tightly contested performance band, slightly trailing the i9-13900HK but marginally ahead of the other three rivals.

The absence of benchmark scores for the i5-14501E means the database records zero wins for it and zero wins for the Ultra 5 in the head-to-head comparison. The data indicates that the Ultra 5 has a measurable performance profile, while the i5-14501E's performance is unrecorded, making any direct comparison of wins impossible.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core i5-14501E and Intel Core Ultra 5 225F differ across several specification fields. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 has 10 cores and 10 threads. Base clocks are identical at 3.30 GHz for both, but boost clocks differ: the i5-14501E reaches 5.20 GHz, and the Ultra 5 reaches 4.90 GHz. Both have a TDP of 65.

Sockets are different, with the i5-14501E using Intel Socket 1700 and the Ultra 5 using Intel Socket 1851. The process node favors the Ultra 5 at 3 nm versus 10 nm for the i5-14501E. The Ultra 5 is built by TSMC, while the i5-14501E is built by Intel. Transistor counts are recorded only for the Ultra 5 at 17,800 million, and die sizes are 243 mm² for the Ultra 5 and 215 mm² for the i5-14501E.

Cache configurations differ in all levels. The i5-14501E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 5 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. Memory support is broader on the i5-14501E with DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory, but memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is listed only for the Ultra 5.

ECC memory is supported by the i5-14501E but not by the Ultra 5. PCIe lanes favor the Ultra 5 with Gen 5 and 20 lanes, compared to Gen 5 and 16 lanes on the i5-14501E. Integrated graphics are present on the i5-14501E as UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 5 has none. The Ultra 5 has a launch MSRP of $231, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-14501E. Release dates differ, with the i5-14501E released on 2024-06-30 and the Ultra 5 on 2025-01-06. Both processors are locked, with no unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data presents an asymmetric comparison. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has a full set of benchmark results and a strong 85th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 37,313. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i9-13900HK, AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, Intel Core i7-13700, and AMD Ryzen 7 160, all sit within 0.5% of its average score, indicating that the Ultra 5 performs in line with established high-end mobile and desktop parts.

The Intel Core i5-14501E, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded and sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0. Its architectural specs, including the higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, 24 MB of L3 cache, and ECC memory support, define its capabilities, but the database contains no measured performance data to compare against the Ultra 5.

For users prioritizing measured performance, the Core Ultra 5 225F is the only option with recorded results. Its 10-core configuration, 3 nm process, and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support its benchmark standing. The i5-14501E offers features the Ultra 5 lacks, such as integrated graphics, ECC memory, and DDR4 compatibility, but its performance remains undocumented in the database.

The choice depends on which factors matter more. The Ultra 5 delivers verified benchmark scores and a higher percentile rank, while the i5-14501E offers broader memory support and ECC functionality, but without recorded performance data, its standing is uncertain. The recorded data clearly favors the Core Ultra 5 225F in terms of measurable computing power.