Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two processors is asymmetrical. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This means a direct core-by-core comparison of scores is not possible; the analysis must rely on the Ultra 3 105UL's absolute scores and its position relative to other CPUs in the database.

The Core Ultra 3 105UL shows a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 8742 points and a single-core score of 1234 points. In Cinebench R20, it records 3671 points multi-core and 518 points single-core. The R15 results are 881 points multi-core and 124 points single-core. These figures indicate a processor that delivers balanced performance across rendering workloads, with the multi-core scores dominating the single-core ones by a significant margin, which is expected for an 8-core, 10-thread part.

In PassMark tests, the Ultra 3 105UL achieves a multi-thread score of 10285 and a single-thread score of 3382. Its integer math score is 41171, while floating point math reaches 30750. Data compression scores 93961, data encryption 6354, and extended instructions 5634. The physics test records 718 points, and random string sorting finishes at 11179. Finding prime numbers yields a score of 44. These results show the processor handling integer-heavy tasks better than floating-point ones, and the data compression score is notably high, suggesting strong memory and cache throughput.

The average benchmark score for the Ultra 3 105UL is 13061, placing it at the 68th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-9400F, which scores 13041 on average, a delta of 0.2 percent in favor of the Ultra 3. The Intel Core i7-10750H scores 13024, a 0.3 percent deficit. The Intel Core i5-8500 scores 13142, putting the Ultra 3 0.6 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-7700K scores 13291, a 1.7 percent gap. These deltas are small, indicating the Ultra 3 105UL sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Because the i5-14501E lacks recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head section cannot declare a winner on scores alone. The data only confirms that the Ultra 3 105UL is a capable mid-range desktop part, outperforming older i5 and i7 chips from previous generations by slim margins. The i5-14501E's performance remains unquantified in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL?

A: The average benchmark score is 13061, placing it at the 68th percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 3 105UL compare to the Intel Core i5-9400F?

A: The Ultra 3 105UL has an average score of 13061, while the i5-9400F scores 13041. This puts the Ultra 3 0.2 percent ahead.

Q: What are the single-core and multi-core Cinebench R23 scores for the Ultra 3 105UL?

A: In Cinebench R23, the Ultra 3 105UL scores 1234 points single-core and 8742 points multi-core.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 3 105UL support ECC memory?

A: No, the database lists ECC memory support as false for this processor.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E uses a 10 nm node, while the Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL uses a 7 nm node.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Core Ultra 3 105UL?

A: The launch MSRP is $295.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural families. The Intel Core i5-14501E is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. The Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL uses Meteor Lake, specifically the Meteor Lake-PS variant, and is part of the Core Ultra Series 1. This represents a generational split, with the Ultra 3 being a newer design targeting efficiency.

The process nodes differ. The i5-14501E is fabricated on a 10 nm process, while the Ultra 3 105UL uses a 7 nm process. Both are manufactured by Intel. The die size for the i5-14501E is 215 mm², while the Ultra 3 105UL has no recorded die size.

Cache hierarchies are notably different. The i5-14501E features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 3 105UL has 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and only 10 MB of shared L3. The larger L3 on the i5-14501E suggests better performance in workloads that benefit from a large shared pool, while the Ultra 3's larger per-core L1 and L2 may help with lower-latency access.

Integrated graphics differ substantially. The i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 3 105UL features Arc Xe-LPG 48EU. These are different GPU architectures, with the Arc part being a newer design. The memory support also splits: the i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 3 105UL supports DDR5 only, with the specific speed depending on the motherboard. The Ultra 3 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the i5-14501E has no bandwidth figure.

PCIe connectivity differs. The i5-14501E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Ultra 3 105UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the i5-14501E a clear advantage in available bandwidth for discrete GPUs or NVMe storage. ECC memory is supported on the i5-14501E but not on the Ultra 3. The sockets are different as well: Intel Socket 1700 for the i5-14501E and Intel Socket 1851 for the Ultra 3.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 3 105UL has 8 cores and 10 threads. Clock speeds also diverge significantly. The i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Ultra 3 105UL has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. The i5-14501E runs much faster at both ends, which typically translates to stronger single-thread performance.

Thermal design power (TDP) is a major differentiator. The i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Ultra 3 105UL has a TDP of 15 watts. This makes the Ultra 3 far more power-efficient, suitable for compact or low-power systems, while the i5-14501E targets standard desktop builds with more thermal headroom.

Memory support differs as noted: DDR4 and DDR5 for the i5-14501E, DDR5 only for the Ultra 3. The Ultra 3 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which the i5-14501E lacks. ECC memory is supported only on the i5-14501E. The PCIe version and lane counts differ: Gen 5 with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes.

Release dates are different. The Ultra 3 105UL was released on 2024-04-07, while the i5-14501E came later on 2024-06-30. Both are listed as Active in production status. The i5-14501E has no launch MSRP, while the Ultra 3 105UL has a launch MSRP of $295. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they are not unlocked for overclocking. The part numbers are Q49HSRNJM for the i5-14501E and SRN9D for the Ultra 3.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split in intended use cases. The Intel Core i5-14501E is a desktop processor with a high boost clock of 5.20 GHz, a 65-watt TDP, and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It also offers ECC support and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. These specifications point to a traditional performance desktop chip, suitable for users who need fast single-thread speeds and broad memory compatibility.

The Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL is a lower-power part with a 15-watt TDP, 8 cores, and 10 threads. Its base clock of 1.50 GHz is low, but the boost clock reaches 4.20 GHz. The recorded benchmark scores show it performs competitively with older i5 and i7 chips, sitting at the 68th percentile. Its strength lies in efficiency and multi-thread throughput relative to its power draw, not in raw clock speed.

For users who prioritize maximum clock speeds, PCIe Gen 5 bandwidth, and ECC memory, the i5-14501E is the better choice based on specifications. For users who need a low-power, compact solution with proven benchmark results and integrated Arc graphics, the Ultra 3 105UL is the better fit. The absence of benchmark data for the i5-14501E means its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the database, so the Ultra 3's scores stand as the only measured evidence.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins on raw specification advantages. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz is substantially higher than the Ultra 3's 4.20 GHz, which should give it an edge in lightly threaded tasks such as gaming or single-core applications, even though no benchmark confirms this. Its 65-watt TDP allows for sustained high clocks under load, whereas the 15-watt Ultra 3 is constrained by thermal and power limits. The i5-14501E's 24 MB of shared L3 cache is more than double the Ultra 3's 10 MB, which helps in workloads with large working sets. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes provides double the bandwidth of the Ultra 3's Gen 4 with 8 lanes, benefiting high-end GPUs and fast storage. ECC memory support makes the i5-14501E suitable for error-sensitive computing environments.

The Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL wins on measured performance per watt. Its 15-watt TDP is a fraction of the i5-14501E's 65-watt TDP, making it ideal for fanless or passively cooled systems. Its 8 cores and 10 threads outnumber the i5-14501E's 6 cores and 12 threads in core count, though the thread count is lower. The benchmark data shows the Ultra 3 achieving a 68th percentile ranking, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8742 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 10285, proving it can handle multi-threaded workloads despite its low base clock. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 48EU graphics are a newer architecture than UHD Graphics 770, potentially offering better media and compute features. The Ultra 3's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is recorded, while the i5-14501E has no such figure, giving the Ultra 3 a documented advantage in memory throughput.

The release date also favors the Ultra 3, which launched earlier on 2024-04-07 compared to the i5-14501E on 2024-06-30, though both are active. The Ultra 3 has a launch MSRP of $295, while the i5-14501E has no recorded price. The socket difference means they are not interchangeable, so platform choice will dictate which processor is viable.