Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i9-14900T Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i9-14900T

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a full set of recorded measurements for the Intel Core i9-14900T, while the Intel Core i5-14501E currently has no benchmark scores listed. Consequently, the comparison relies entirely on the i9-14900T's performance data and its position relative to other CPUs in the database.

The i9-14900T delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 and a single-core score of 4348. In Cinebench R20, it scores 12937 multi-core and 1826 single-core, while in Cinebench R15 it records 3104 multi-core and 438 single-core. These results indicate a strong balance between heavily threaded workloads and single-thread responsiveness.

In PassMark tests, the i9-14900T shows 436066 for data compression, 27062 for data encryption, 23660 for extended instructions, 164 for find prime numbers, 92699 for floating point math, 138149 for integer math, 36239 for multithread, 2245 for physics, 49484 for random string sorting, and 4016 for single-thread performance. The multithread score of 36239 and integer math score of 138149 highlight the processor's capability in parallel integer workloads, while the single-thread score of 4016 confirms strong per-core performance.

The i9-14900T holds an average benchmark score of 51015, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals provide context: the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761, which is 0.5% lower; the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310, which is 0.6% higher; the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718, which is 0.6% lower; and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448, which is 1.1% lower. The data shows the i9-14900T sits within a narrow band of performance, slightly behind the Core Ultra 9 285T but ahead of the other three rivals by margins ranging from 0.5% to 1.1%.

Since the i5-14501E has no recorded benchmarks, no direct head-to-head wins can be established. The database lists zero wins for each processor in direct comparisons. The i5-14501E's percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs, while the i9-14900T's 90th percentile indicates it outperforms the vast majority of recorded processors. The i9-14900T's average score of 51015 far exceeds the i5-14501E's average score of 0, though this reflects the absence of data rather than a measured deficit.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same Raptor Lake architecture and Raptor Lake-R codename, both manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node. Both use the Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel memory bus, and include UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. Both also support ECC memory and provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The core configurations differ substantially. The i5-14501E uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i9-14900T uses 24 cores and 32 threads. This difference in core count is the primary architectural distinction, directly influencing multi-threaded performance. The i9-14900T's larger core pool aligns with its higher multi-core benchmark scores.

Clock speeds also diverge. The i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i9-14900T has a base clock of 1.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The i9-14900T's lower base clock reflects its lower thermal design power of 35 watts, while its higher boost clock allows it to reach 5.50 GHz under load. The i5-14501E carries a thermal design power of 65 watts, which is higher than the i9-14900T despite having fewer cores.

Cache hierarchies differ in size. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core for the i5-14501E and 2 MB per core for the i9-14900T. The shared L3 cache is 24 MB for the i5-14501E and 36 MB for the i9-14900T. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the i9-14900T support its higher core count and more demanding workloads.

The die size also differs: the i5-14501E measures 215 mm², while the i9-14900T measures 257 mm². The larger die on the i9-14900T accommodates the additional cores and cache. Both processors are desktop market segments, are actively produced, and have locked multipliers, meaning they do not support unlocked overclocking.

Release dates differ, with the i5-14501E released on 2024-06-30 and the i9-14900T released on 2024-01-07. The i9-14900T has a part number of SRN3U, while the i5-14501E has a part number of Q49HSRNJM. The i9-14900T has a launch MSRP of $549, while the i5-14501E has no listed launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900T has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i9-14900T has a base clock of 1.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the thermal design power compare?

A: The i5-14501E has a thermal design power of 65 watts, while the i9-14900T has a thermal design power of 35 watts.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the i9-14900T?

A: The i9-14900T has an average benchmark score of 51015, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the i5-14501E have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: The database lists no benchmark scores for the i5-14501E. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory and integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both the i5-14501E and the i9-14900T support ECC memory and include UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly favors the Intel Core i9-14900T in terms of benchmark performance. Its average score of 51015 and 90th percentile ranking demonstrate strong performance, backed by specific Cinebench and PassMark results. The i5-14501E has no benchmark scores in the database, so no measured performance can be attributed to it.

The i9-14900T's 24 cores and 32 threads provide a substantial advantage in multi-threaded workloads, as reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 and PassMark multithread score of 36239. Its 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache support these workloads effectively.

The i9-14900T also has a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which contributes to its single-thread score of 4348 in Cinebench R23 and 4016 in PassMark single-thread tests. Its lower thermal design power of 35 watts suggests efficient operation, though the i5-14501E operates at a higher 65 watts.

For users selecting between these two processors, the i9-14900T is the only one with measurable performance data, and that data indicates it performs at a high level relative to its nearest rivals. The i5-14501E, with only 6 cores and 12 threads, has no recorded benchmarks, leaving its performance unquantified in the database.

The i9-14900T's launch MSRP of $549 provides a reference point, though the i5-14501E has no comparable listing. The i9-14900T's position among its nearest rivals, within 1.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and 0.6% of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, confirms it belongs to a competitive performance tier.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields:

• Cores: 6 (i5-14501E) vs 24 (i9-14900T)
• Threads: 12 (i5-14501E) vs 32 (i9-14900T)
• Base clock: 3.30 GHz (i5-14501E) vs 1.10 GHz (i9-14900T)
• Boost clock: 5.20 GHz (i5-14501E) vs 5.50 GHz (i9-14900T)
• TDP: 65 watts (i5-14501E) vs 35 watts (i9-14900T)
• Die size: 215 mm² (i5-14501E) vs 257 mm² (i9-14900T)
• L2 cache: 1.25 MB per core (i5-14501E) vs 2 MB per core (i9-14900T)
• L3 cache: 24 MB shared (i5-14501E) vs 36 MB shared (i9-14900T)
• Release date: 2024-06-30 (i5-14501E) vs 2024-01-07 (i9-14900T)
• Launch MSRP: None listed (i5-14501E) vs $549 (i9-14900T)
• Part number: Q49HSRNJM (i5-14501E) vs SRN3U (i9-14900T)
• Generation: Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) vs Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Fields that are identical include the socket (Intel Socket 1700), architecture (Raptor Lake), process node (10 nm), L1 cache (80 KB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC memory support (true), PCIe (Gen 5, 16 lanes CPU only), integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and whether the multiplier is unlocked (false for both).

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the i9-14900T wins in every measurable category. Its benchmark scores span Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both multi-core and single-core tests, plus a range of PassMark workloads including data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance.

The i9-14900T's multi-core performance is particularly strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 and a PassMark multithread score of 36239. Its 24 cores and 32 threads enable heavy parallel workloads, and its 36 MB L3 cache provides ample shared storage for large datasets.

The i5-14501E, with no benchmark scores, has no recorded wins in any category. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are fewer than the i9-14900T's, and its 24 MB L3 cache is smaller. Its higher base clock of 3.30 GHz suggests potential efficiency in lightly threaded tasks, but no measured data confirms this.

The i9-14900T's nearest rival comparisons show it is nearly tied with the Intel Core i7-13850HX (0.5% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (0.6% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (1.1% ahead), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.6%. These margins place the i9-14900T in a tight performance cluster, where small differences in workload type could shift rankings.

For users prioritizing multi-threaded tasks such as rendering, compilation, or scientific computation, the i9-14900T's core count and benchmark scores make it the clear choice. For single-threaded tasks, its boost clock of 5.50 GHz and single-core scores of 4348 in Cinebench R23 and 4016 in PassMark support strong performance. The i5-14501E remains an unmeasured option, with its 65-watt thermal design power and 6-core configuration offering no recorded evidence of competitive performance.