Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i9-14900KS Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501E and Intel Core i9-14900KS both belong to Intel’s Core 14th Gen desktop lineup, share the Raptor Lake architecture, and use the same Intel Socket 1700. The two processors target different segments of the desktop market, and the recorded benchmark data for the i9-14900KS shows a decisive performance advantage across every measured workload. The i5-14501E, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database, so the comparison relies entirely on the i9-14900KS’s recorded scores and the architectural specifications listed for both parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. All available benchmark results belong exclusively to the Intel Core i9-14900KS. The i5-14501E has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs. The i9-14900KS, in contrast, holds a 96th percentile rank and an average benchmark score of 81,127.

Cinebench results for the i9-14900KS illustrate its multi-core strength. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 5,140, while the single-core score is 725. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score reaches 21,417 and the single-core score is 3,023. Cinebench R23 shows a multi-core score of 50,995 and a single-core score of 7,199. These numbers place the i9-14900KS far above typical desktop processors in the database, consistent with its 96th percentile standing.

Geekbench results follow the same pattern. The i9-14900KS records a multi-core score of 23,931 and a single-core score of 2,692. PassMark tests add further detail. The multi-thread score is 60,012, and the single-thread score is 4,815. Integer math scores 212,644, floating point math scores 153,975, and extended instructions score 45,524. Data compression scores 803,368, data encryption scores 47,717, and random string sorting scores 89,789. The physics test records 3,381, and the find prime numbers test records 244.

Because the i5-14501E has no recorded benchmarks, there is no direct score comparison between the two processors. The data confirms that the i9-14900KS is a high-performance part, but it does not quantify the i5-14501E’s performance in any test. The nearest rivals for the i9-14900KS provide context. The Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81,115, a difference of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 81,103, also 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 80,762, which is 0.5 percent lower. The Intel Xeon 638 scores 80,723, also 0.5 percent lower. The i9-14900KS’s average score of 81,127 puts it essentially level with those parts, with only sub-percent differences separating them.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14900KS wins in every recorded benchmark category because it is the only one of the two with benchmark data. Multi-threaded workloads show the largest absolute scores, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 50,995 and PassMark multi-thread at 60,012. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 7,199 and Geekbench single-core at 2,692. The PassMark suite shows particular strength in integer math (212,644) and floating point math (153,975), indicating solid general computational throughput.

The i5-14501E has no wins because it has no benchmark results. Its specifications suggest a different usage profile, but the database does not contain measured data to confirm performance in any application. The i5-14501E uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i9-14900KS uses 24 cores and 32 threads. The i9-14900KS also has a higher boost clock, 6.20 GHz versus 5.20 GHz, and a larger L3 cache, 36 MB versus 24 MB. These specification gaps align with the benchmark data showing the i9-14900KS as the far more capable processor for heavy workloads.

The i5-14501E does have a lower thermal design power, 65 watts versus 150 watts for the i9-14900KS. That lower power draw may make the i5-14501E more suitable for systems with modest cooling or lower overall system power budgets, but the database does not include power efficiency benchmarks, so no measured comparison is possible.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-R codename. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel’s own foundry. The die sizes differ, with the i5-14501E at 215 mm² and the i9-14900KS at 257 mm². The larger die on the i9-14900KS corresponds to its higher core count and larger cache.

Core configurations differ substantially. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The i9-14900KS has 24 cores and 32 threads. The thread count difference, 12 versus 32, is larger than the core count difference, 6 versus 24, indicating that the i9-14900KS uses a mix of performance and efficiency cores, while the i5-14501E appears to rely on fewer cores with hyper-threading.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14501E and 2 MB per core on the i9-14900KS. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared on the i5-14501E and 36 MB shared on the i9-14900KS. The larger per-core L2 and shared L3 on the i9-14900KS support its higher core count and more demanding workloads.

Base clocks are close, with the i5-14501E at 3.30 GHz and the i9-14900KS at 3.20 GHz. Boost clocks differ more significantly, with the i5-14501E reaching 5.20 GHz and the i9-14900KS reaching 6.20 GHz. The i9-14900KS has an unlocked multiplier, while the i5-14501E does not. That unlocked multiplier allows user-controlled overclocking on the i9-14900KS, a feature absent from the i5-14501E.

Memory support is identical on paper. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Both support ECC memory. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both integrate UHD Graphics 770. The production status for both is active, and both are desktop market segments.

The release dates differ by several months. The i9-14900KS was released on March 13, 2024. The i5-14501E was released on June 30, 2024. The i9-14900KS has a launch MSRP of $689. The i5-14501E has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

The i9-14900KS’s part number is SRN7R, while the i5-14501E’s part number is Q49HSRNJM. The i9-14900KS’s percentile rank of 96 versus the i5-14501E’s rank of 50 places them in different performance tiers within the database.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core i9-14900KS. It holds a 96th percentile rank among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 81,127. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Xeon w5-3535X and AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, score within 0 percent, indicating that the i9-14900KS sits at the top of the database’s performance distribution. The i5-14501E, with its 50th percentile rank and no recorded benchmarks, cannot be directly compared in measured performance.

The i9-14900KS’s 24 cores, 32 threads, 6.20 GHz boost clock, and 36 MB L3 cache provide the architectural foundation for its high scores. The i5-14501E’s 6 cores, 12 threads, 5.20 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB L3 cache indicate a more modest configuration. The i9-14900KS also offers an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the i5-14501E does not.

Users requiring maximum multi-threaded performance, as indicated by Cinebench R23 multi-core at 50,995 and PassMark multi-thread at 60,012, should select the i9-14900KS. Users with strict power limits may consider the i5-14501E, since its 65 watt TDP is less than half of the i9-14900KS’s 150 watt TDP, but the database does not provide power or efficiency benchmarks to quantify that trade-off. The i9-14900KS is the only one of the two with measured data, and that data places it among the fastest desktop processors recorded.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i9-14900KS?

A: The average benchmark score is 81,127, placing it at the 96th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900KS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81,115, the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 81,103, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 80,762, and the Intel Xeon 638 scores 80,723. The i9-14900KS is within 0.5 percent of all four.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The i9-14900KS has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?

A: The i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the i9-14900KS boosts to 6.20 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the i5-14501E and the i9-14900KS support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has an unlocked multiplier?

A: The i9-14900KS has an unlocked multiplier. The i5-14501E does not.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14501E | Intel Core i9-14900KS |

|----------------|----------------------|-----------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 24 |

| Threads | 12 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 6.20 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 150 W |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-03-13 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $689 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | Q49HSRNJM | SRN7R |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 96 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 81,127 |