Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i9-14900 Comparison

Intel Core i5-14501E and Intel Core i9-14900 are both 14th Gen desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they occupy very different positions in the lineup. The i5-14501E is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor boosting to 5.80 GHz. The database contains no benchmark scores for the i5-14501E, meaning its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 and it holds the 50th percentile among all CPUs. In contrast, the i9-14900 has a full suite of recorded scores and sits at the 92nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 58115. This disparity in available data means the quantitative comparison rests entirely on the i9-14900's recorded performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The i9-14900 delivers dominant multi-core performance in every recorded test. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 31070 points. Its Cinebench R20 multicore result is 15910, and its Cinebench R15 multicore score is 4793. The i5-14501E has no recorded scores in any of these tests, so the i9-14900's advantage cannot be expressed as a percentage. The data shows a clear gap in raw thread throughput, consistent with the i9-14900's 24 cores and 32 threads versus the i5-14501E's 6 cores and 12 threads.

Single-core results also favor the i9-14900, though the margin is smaller. The i9-14900 scores 2212 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2245 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 315 in Cinebench R15 single-core. Its Geekbench single-core score is 2488. The i5-14501E has no recorded single-core data, so a direct comparison is impossible. The i9-14900's boost clock of 5.80 GHz is 0.60 GHz higher than the i5-14501E's 5.20 GHz, which likely contributes to its higher single-thread ceiling.

In Geekbench multicore, the i9-14900 records 18495 points. This result aligns with its position among its nearest rivals in the database. The i9-14900's average benchmark score of 58115 places it within 1% of several competitors. It trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.7%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%. These narrow margins indicate that the i9-14900 sits in a tightly contested performance band.

PassMark tests further illustrate the i9-14900's multi-threaded strengths. It scores 44578 in PassMark multithread, 175010 in integer math, and 120262 in floating point math. Data compression reaches 550271, and data encryption scores 33540. Extended instructions score 30624, while random string sorting hits 61060. Physics tests record 2486, and finding prime numbers scores 188. The single-thread PassMark result is 4323. None of these tests have corresponding i5-14501E scores in the database.

The i9-14900's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its overall standing. Its average benchmark score of 58115 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M at 58323, a difference of only 0.4%. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58386, 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57555, which is 1% lower than the i9-14900. These comparisons show that the i9-14900 performs at a level comparable to server and workstation processors despite being a desktop part.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear hierarchy between these two processors. The i9-14900 is the stronger performer across all recorded benchmarks, with a 92nd percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 58115. The i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 0. For workloads that depend on multi-core throughput, the i9-14900 is the only option with quantitative evidence of capability.

The i5-14501E's lower core count and thread count suggest it targets lighter desktop workloads. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for basic multitasking and single-threaded applications, but the lack of recorded scores means the database cannot confirm its performance level. The i9-14900, with 24 cores and 32 threads, is designed for heavy parallel workloads. Its recorded scores in Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark demonstrate sustained high throughput.

Users with workloads that scale across many threads should choose the i9-14900. The recorded data shows it competes with Xeon and EPYC processors within 1%, making it a strong desktop option for rendering, compilation, and data processing. The i5-14501E may suit users with modest requirements, but the absence of benchmark data prevents a data-backed recommendation.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-R codename, and both are built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The i9-14900 has a larger die at 257 mm², while the i5-14501E measures 215 mm². Transistor counts are not recorded for either processor.

The core configurations differ substantially. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads. This difference explains the i9-14900's superior multi-core benchmark results. The i9-14900 also has a higher boost clock at 5.80 GHz versus 5.20 GHz for the i5-14501E, though the i5-14501E has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the i9-14900.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14501E and 2 MB per core on the i9-14900. Shared L3 cache is 24 MB on the i5-14501E and 36 MB on the i9-14900. The larger caches on the i9-14900 support its higher core count and heavier workloads.

Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. The PCIe interface is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are the same UHD Graphics 770 on both parts. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as Active production. The i9-14900 was released on 2024-01-07, while the i5-14501E followed on 2024-06-30.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which is 0.60 GHz higher than the Intel Core i5-14501E's 5.20 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the i9-14900's average benchmark score?

A: The i9-14900 has an average benchmark score of 58115, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the database have any benchmark scores for the i5-14501E?

A: No, the i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the i5-14501E and the i9-14900 support ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: How does the i9-14900 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14900's average benchmark score of 58115 is 0.4% lower than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon w5-2545, and 1% higher than the AMD EPYC 9015.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14900 wins in every category with recorded data. Its multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (31070), R20 (15910), and R15 (4793) demonstrate strong parallel processing capability. Geekbench multicore at 18495 confirms this trend. PassMark multithread at 44578, integer math at 175010, and floating point math at 120262 all indicate heavy compute throughput. Data compression at 550271 and data encryption at 33540 show strength in data-intensive tasks. Extended instructions at 30624 and random string sorting at 61060 round out its broad performance profile.

Single-thread performance also favors the i9-14900, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2212, R20 single-core at 2245, R15 single-core at 315, Geekbench single-core at 2488, and PassMark single-thread at 4323. The higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz supports these results. The i5-14501E's 5.20 GHz boost clock is lower, and without recorded scores, its single-thread standing cannot be quantified.

The i5-14501E's advantages are limited to its specification sheet. It has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz on the i9-14900, which may indicate lower idle or lightly threaded power characteristics, though TDP is identical at 65 watts for both. Its smaller die size of 215 mm² versus 257 mm² suggests a simpler design. The i5-14501E also has a later release date of 2024-06-30. However, these differences do not translate into recorded benchmark wins.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. Core count is 6 on the i5-14501E and 24 on the i9-14900. Threads are 12 versus 32. Base clock is 3.30 GHz on the i5-14501E and 2.00 GHz on the i9-14900. Boost clock is 5.20 GHz versus 5.80 GHz. Die size is 215 mm² versus 257 mm². L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core versus 2 MB per core. L3 cache is 24 MB shared versus 36 MB shared. The i9-14900 has a launch MSRP of $549. The i5-14501E has no recorded launch MSRP. Release dates are 2024-06-30 for the i5-14501E and 2024-01-07 for the i9-14900. The part numbers are Q49HSRNJM for the i5-14501E and SRN3V for the i9-14900.

Shared specifications include the Raptor Lake architecture, Raptor Lake-R codename, Intel 10 nm process node, Intel Socket 1700, 65 watt TDP, dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, ECC memory support, Gen 5 PCIe with 16 CPU lanes, UHD Graphics 770, locked multipliers, and Active production status. Both are desktop market segment parts from Intel's Core 14th Gen series.