Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison
Intel Core i5-14501E
Core i7-14701E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i7-14701E
The Verdict
The Intel Core i7-14701E is the clear performance leader based on the recorded benchmark data. It holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14501E sits at the 50th percentile. The i7-14701E delivers 8 cores and 16 threads compared to the i5-14501E's 6 cores and 12 threads, and this core advantage translates directly into substantially higher multi-threaded scores across Cinebench and Passmark suites. The i7 also carries a larger shared L3 cache at 33 MB versus 24 MB, and its per-core L2 cache is 2 MB versus the i5's 1.25 MB. For workloads that scale with thread count, cache capacity, or sustained multi-core throughput, the i7-14701E is the appropriate choice.
The i5-14501E, however, offers a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz against the i7's 2.60 GHz, and both parts share the same 5.20 GHz boost clock for the i5 and 5.40 GHz boost for the i7. The i5-14501E is the more power-conscious option at the same 65 W TDP, but with fewer cores and less cache, its benchmark ceiling is lower. Users who prioritize single-thread responsiveness might lean toward the i5 for its superior base frequency, but the i7's boost clock is also higher, and its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3133 is strong. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database, so no price-based differentiation is possible from the data.
For mixed workloads, the i7-14701E is the safer pick: it wins the vast majority of recorded benchmark comparisons and lands within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and Intel Core i7-13650HX in average score, while outperforming the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by 0% delta and edging out the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS by 0.1%. The i5-14501E has no rival data or benchmark entries in the database, meaning its measured performance envelope is not yet characterized. Systems that need maximum compute density per socket should select the i7-14701E; systems where the lower base clock of the i7 is a concern may consider the i5, but the data does not show any scenario where the i5 exceeds the i7 in a recorded test.
Architecture Differences
Both processors belong to Intel's Core 14th Gen series and use the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. They share the same Intel Socket 1700, dual-channel memory bus supporting DDR4 and DDR5, ECC memory capability, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770. Both were released on the same date, 2024-06-30, and both are marked as Active production status with a Desktop market segment. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.
The core configuration is the primary architectural divergence. The i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. This two-core, four-thread difference is the foundation for the i7's multi-core advantage. Cache hierarchy also differs meaningfully: L1 cache is 80 KB per core for both, but L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core for the i5 and 2 MB per core for the i7. Shared L3 cache scales from 24 MB on the i5 to 33 MB on the i7, a 37.5% increase in last-level capacity that benefits workloads with larger working sets.
Die size reflects the added resources: the i5-14501E measures 215 mm², while the i7-14701E measures 257 mm², a difference of 42 mm². Both parts draw a 65 W TDP, meaning the i7 delivers higher core counts and more cache within the same thermal envelope, likely due to its lower 2.60 GHz base clock compared to the i5's 3.30 GHz. The i7's boost clock is higher at 5.40 GHz versus the i5's 5.20 GHz, so the i7 has both a higher peak frequency and more cores, though it idles at a lower base frequency under light loads.
The part numbers are Q49HSRNJM for the i5 and Q49FSRNJK for the i7. Both are locked multipliers, so overclocking headroom is not an architectural feature for either. The process node and foundry are identical (Intel, 10 nm), so all performance differences stem from core count, clock strategy, and cache capacity rather than fabrication improvements.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database records benchmark results only for the i7-14701E; no benchmark scores exist for the i5-14501E in the provided data. Therefore, the i7's absolute scores define its performance envelope, and comparisons to the i5 must be inferred from architectural specs rather than measured deltas.
In Cinebench R23, the i7-14701E scores 22195 in multi-core and 3133 in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: with 8 cores and 16 threads, the i7 achieves a ratio of roughly 7.08 times its single-core score, indicating strong scaling across cores. Cinebench R20 results show 9321 multi-core and 1315 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2237 multi-core and 315 single-core. These scores place the i7 in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33206.
Passmark results for the i7-14701E further characterize its strengths. The multi-thread score is 26112, and the single-thread score is 4305 (recorded twice in the database, once as "passmark_single_thread" and once as "passmark_singlethread", both identical). Integer math scores 81325, floating-point math scores 61873, and extended instructions score 18528. Data compression reaches 282939, while data encryption hits 14862. Random string sorting scores 29158, find prime numbers scores 176, and physics scores 2399.
Comparing the i7 to its nearest rivals in the database, the delta percentages are tight. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has an average score of 33201, a 0% delta from the i7's 33206. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33244, which is 0.1% higher than the i7. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33091, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33089, 0.4% lower. These data points show the i7-14701E sitting in a crowded performance band where the top four rivals are within 0.5% of each other.
The i5-14501E has no recorded benchmarks, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile rank of 50 is a default midpoint, not a measured outcome. This absence of data means the i5's actual performance relative to the i7 cannot be quantified from the database. The only measurable differences are architectural: 6 cores versus 8, 12 threads versus 16, 24 MB L3 versus 33 MB, and base clocks of 3.30 GHz versus 2.60 GHz.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What are the boost clock differences?
A: The i7-14701E boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz. The i5 has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz compared to the i7's 2.60 GHz.
Q: How does the cache compare between the two?
A: Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The i7 has 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3, while the i5 has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3.
Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the i5-14501E?
A: No. The database contains benchmark results only for the i7-14701E. The i5-14501E has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0.
Q: What is the i7-14701E's percentile ranking and average score?
A: The i7-14701E ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33206. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, scores 33201, a 0% delta.
Q: Do both processors support the same memory and expansion features?
A: Yes. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, include ECC memory support, use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and integrate UHD Graphics 770.
Where Each One Wins
The i7-14701E wins in every measured category because it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark data. Its multi-core performance is the standout: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22195, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 9321, and Cinebench R15 multi-core of 2237 all reflect the benefit of 8 cores and 16 threads. Passmark multi-thread at 26112, integer math at 81325, and floating-point math at 61873 show the same pattern. Workloads that use all cores, such as video rendering, scientific simulation, or code compilation, will favor the i7 heavily.
Data-heavy operations also lean to the i7. Passmark data compression at 282939 and data encryption at 14862 indicate strong throughput for archiving, database processing, and secure communication tasks. The larger 33 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce memory traffic for repetitive data access patterns, which helps in server-style workloads. The higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz gives the i7 an edge in single-threaded tasks as well; its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133 and Passmark single-thread score of 4305 are competitive with the top rivals in its class.
The i5-14501E cannot be declared a winner in any benchmark category, as no measurements exist. However, its architectural profile suggests potential advantages in specific scenarios. The higher 3.30 GHz base clock means that under sustained all-core loads where boost frequencies are limited by thermal or power constraints, the i5 may hold a higher floor frequency than the i7's 2.60 GHz base. For lightly threaded tasks that run primarily at base clock rather than boost, the i5 could deliver better latency. The smaller die size of 215 mm² versus 257 mm² may also produce less heat density, though both are rated at 65 W TDP.
For users selecting between the two, the i7-14701E is the only part with measured performance data, so it is the only one that can be validated against rivals. The i5-14501E remains an unquantified option with fewer cores, less cache, and a lower boost ceiling. The i7's 83rd percentile ranking places it above most CPUs in the database, while the i5's 50th percentile is a placeholder, not a result. In the absence of i5 benchmark data, the i7-14701E is the defensible choice for any workload that benefits from additional cores, threads, or cache capacity.