Intel Core i5-14490F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-14490F and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 represent two fundamentally different approaches to processor design. The i5-14490F is a desktop-oriented x86 chip from Intel’s Core 14th Gen family, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 is a mobile-focused Arm-based processor from Qualcomm, using the Glymur codename and fabricated on a 3 nm process. The database contains complete benchmark results for the Intel part, while the Qualcomm chip currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data shapes the entire comparison, as the analysis must rely on architectural specifications and the Intel processor’s measured performance against its nearest rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database is empty. There are no direct comparison scores between the Intel Core i5-14490F and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100. The Qualcomm chip has zero recorded benchmark entries, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. The Intel processor, by contrast, has 17 separate benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark tests. This means the only numerical comparisons available are those between the i5-14490F and its nearest rivals, which are all other x86 processors.

The Intel Core i5-14490F achieves an average benchmark score of 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i5-13600KF, which scores 38103, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the i5-14490F. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14490F. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, putting it 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, leading the i5-14490F by 0.3%. These deltas are all extremely small, indicating that the i5-14490F sits in a tightly contested performance band.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-14490F scores 23000. Its single-core score in the same test is 3247. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 9660 and single-core is 1363. The Cinebench R15 results show 2318 for multi-core and 327 for single-core. These numbers provide a baseline for what the Qualcomm chip would need to match, but without any recorded scores for the Snapdragon X2E-78-100, the direct comparison cannot be quantified.

The Passmark suite shows the i5-14490F’s strengths in various workloads. It scores 87844 in integer math, 66558 in floating point math, and 340026 in data compression. Data encryption yields 18225, extended instructions score 21731, and find prime numbers results in 122. Random string sorting produces 35608, physics scores 2093, and multithread performance is 28662. The single-thread score is 3873, which is identical to the singlethread entry.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in every measurable category because it is the only processor with recorded data. Its 10 cores and 16 threads allow it to handle parallel workloads effectively. The Cinebench scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance, with the R23 multi-core score of 23000 being particularly notable. The single-core scores of 3247 in R23 and 3873 in Passmark suggest solid responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no benchmark wins because no scores exist. However, architectural data suggests where it might excel. Its 12 cores and 12 threads, all running at a base clock of 4.00 GHz, indicate a design focused on sustained multi-core throughput. The L2 cache is 16 MB shared, which is larger than the i5-14490F’s per-core L2 of 1.25 MB. The Qualcomm chip also supports memory bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s, a figure that is not provided for the Intel part. These specifications could translate to advantages in memory-intensive workloads, but without benchmark data, this remains speculative.

The i5-14490F’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant resource for repetitive tasks. Its boost clock of 5.00 GHz gives it a high ceiling for single-thread performance, which is reflected in the Passmark single-thread score of 3873. The Qualcomm chip has no boost clock listed, so its maximum frequency is unknown. The base clock of 4.00 GHz is higher than the i5-14490F’s base clock of 2.50 GHz, but the Intel part’s boost clock is the more relevant figure for peak performance.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry. The die size is 215 mm². The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a different approach, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 220 mm², slightly larger than the Intel chip despite the more advanced node.

Core counts differ significantly. The i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, indicating the use of hyper-threading. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. The Intel chip’s L1 cache is 80 KB per core, while the Qualcomm chip has 288 KB per core. The L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on the Intel part versus 16 MB shared on the Qualcomm part. The i5-14490F has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Qualcomm chip lists no L3 cache.

Memory support differs as well. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Qualcomm chip supports LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, with a specified bandwidth of 152.4 GB/s. The Intel part’s memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. PCIe support is Gen 5 for both, but the Intel chip provides 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Qualcomm chip provides 12 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics present a major distinction. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, which is why the “F” suffix indicates a lack of iGPU. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 includes an Adreno X2-85 integrated GPU. This makes the Qualcomm chip a complete system-on-chip, suitable for mobile devices that do not require a discrete graphics card. The Intel chip requires a separate GPU for any display output.

The socket types are incompatible. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Qualcomm part uses Qualcomm BGA 2343. The market segments also differ: the i5-14490F is a desktop processor, and the Snapdragon X2E-78-100 is a mobile processor. The release dates show the Intel chip came out on 2023-12-31, while the Qualcomm chip’s release date is 2026-04-05. Both are marked as Active in production.

The process node difference is stark. Intel uses a 10 nm process, while Qualcomm uses a 3 nm process. This typically indicates that the Qualcomm chip can achieve higher energy efficiency and potentially higher transistor density, though the database does not list transistor counts for either. The foundry is also different: Intel for the i5-14490F, TSMC for the Snapdragon X2E-78-100.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores. However, the Intel chip has 16 threads due to hyper-threading, while the Qualcomm chip has 12 threads.

Q: What are the benchmark scores for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. This means no direct performance comparison is possible.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14490F have integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics. The “F” in its name indicates this. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 does include an Adreno X2-85 integrated GPU.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14490F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600KF, 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 250, and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13600HX. The differences are minimal.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 supports LPDDR5X memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but incomplete picture. The Intel Core i5-14490F is a fully measured processor with 17 benchmark scores, an average score of 38149, and a percentile ranking of 86. It competes closely with several other mid-range x86 chips, with all deltas under 0.3%. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no measured performance, no average score, and no rivals to compare against. Any verdict must acknowledge this asymmetry.

For users selecting based on recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the only choice with verified performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and single-core score of 3247 indicate strong capability in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. Its Passmark results, including 87844 in integer math and 340026 in data compression, show versatility across different workload types. The chip’s 65 TDP and 5.00 GHz boost clock suggest it can deliver high performance while remaining within a moderate power envelope.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 offers architectural advantages that are not yet quantified. Its 3 nm process, 12 cores, and 152.4 GB/s memory bandwidth point to potential efficiency and throughput benefits. The integrated Adreno X2-85 GPU makes it suitable for compact mobile systems. However, without benchmark scores, these advantages remain theoretical.

The market segment difference is decisive. The Intel chip is designed for desktop systems with Socket 1700, requiring a separate GPU. The Qualcomm chip is a mobile processor on BGA 2343, with integrated graphics and LPDDR5X memory support. A user building a desktop workstation would choose the Intel part based on available data. A user designing a mobile device would consider the Qualcomm part, but the lack of performance metrics makes it impossible to assess its competitiveness against the Intel chip or any other processor.

The database shows that the i5-14490F is a solid performer in its class, sitting within 0.3% of four rival chips. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 is an unknown quantity, with zero recorded measurements. Until benchmark data is added for the Qualcomm chip, the only defensible position is that the Intel Core i5-14490F delivers verified performance, while the Snapdragon X2E-78-100 presents an unverified architectural promise.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14490F | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 65 W | Not listed |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Not listed |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Glymur |

| Generation | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Snapdragon X2 (Elite) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 220 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 16 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | Not listed |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 152.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Adreno X2-85 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2023-12-31 | 2026-04-05 |

| Part Number | SRN35 | X2E78100 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 38149 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 50 |

The specification table shows that both processors have no ECC memory support, no unlocked multiplier, and are marked as Active in production. The Intel chip has a known part number of SRN35, while the Qualcomm chip uses X2E78100. Neither has a launch MSRP listed in the database. The Intel chip’s generation is explicitly Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh), while the Qualcomm chip’s generation is Snapdragon X2 (Elite). These are the only differences recorded across all fields.