Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-14490F

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14700T

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,318
2,618
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
327
369
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
9,660
10,911
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,363
1,540
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
23,000
25,980
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,247
3,667
passmark_data_compression
340,026
354,216
passmark_data_encryption
18,225
21,277
passmark_extended_instructions
21,731
20,052
passmark_find_prime_numbers
122
145
passmark_floating_point_math
66,558
79,042
passmark_integer_math
87,844
113,854
passmark_multithread
28,662
30,571
passmark_physics
2,093
1,946
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,608
38,546
passmark_single_thread
3,873
3,905
passmark_singlethread
3,873
3,905

Analysis: Intel Core i5-14490F vs Intel Core i7-14700T

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data shows a decisive overall victory for the Intel Core i7-14700T, which wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core i5-14490F. The only two victories for the i5-14490F come in extended instructions and physics workloads, with margins of 8.4% and 7.6% respectively. Across the Cinebench suite, the i7-14700T leads consistently by 11.4% to 11.5% in both single-core and multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-14700T scores 25,980 against 23,000 for the i5-14490F, a delta of 11.5%. Single-core R23 shows the same relative gap, with 3,667 versus 3,247 points.

The PassMark integer math test reveals the largest single advantage for the i7-14700T, which delivers 113,854 points against 87,844 for the i5-14490F, a 22.8% lead. Floating point math follows a similar pattern, with the i7-14700T scoring 79,042 versus 66,558, a 15.8% margin. Prime number finding also favors the i7-14700T, at 145 versus 122, representing a 15.9% delta. Data encryption shows a 14.3% advantage for the i7-14700T, with scores of 21,277 and 18,225.

The i7-14700T also leads in multithreaded PassMark performance, scoring 30,571 against 28,662, a 6.2% gap. Random string sorting goes to the i7-14700T by 7.6%, with 38,546 versus 35,608. Data compression shows a narrower 4% edge for the i7-14700T, at 354,216 against 340,026. Single-thread PassMark scores are nearly identical, with the i7-14700T at 3,905 and the i5-14490F at 3,873, just a 0.8% difference. The i5-14490F counters with an 8.4% win in extended instructions, scoring 21,731 versus 20,052, and a 7.6% win in physics, at 2,093 versus 1,946.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-14700T dominates in all multi-core heavy workloads. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests all show the same 11.5% lead, indicating that the additional cores and threads translate directly into rendering performance. PassMark integer math, floating point math, and prime number calculations all favor the i7-14700T by double-digit margins, making it the stronger choice for computational tasks that scale with core count. The 22.8% lead in integer math is the standout result, suggesting particularly strong performance in arithmetic-heavy applications like compilers or scientific simulations.

The i7-14700T also wins in memory-related workloads such as data compression and random string sorting, though by smaller margins of 4% and 7.6%. Encryption performance shows a solid 14.3% advantage for the i7-14700T, which may matter for security-focused applications. The i5-14490F retains an edge in extended instructions, likely reflecting its higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 1.30 GHz, and in physics calculations, where it leads by 7.6%. These two wins indicate that the i5-14490F handles certain specialized workloads more efficiently despite having fewer cores.

For single-threaded tasks, the i7-14700T holds a slight advantage across both Cinebench and PassMark, but the margins are small. The R23 single-core delta of 11.5% is more pronounced than the 0.8% PassMark single-thread gap, suggesting that the i7-14700T's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz gives it a clear edge in bursty single-core scenarios. The overall average benchmark scores confirm the hierarchy: the i7-14700T averages 41,914 points against 38,149 for the i5-14490F, and it sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs versus the 86th for the i5-14490F.

Architecture Differences

Both processors belong to Intel's Core 14th Gen series and share the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. They are built on the same 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The i7-14700T uses a larger die at 257 mm², while the i5-14490F measures 215 mm². Core counts differ substantially: the i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. This core and thread advantage is the primary driver of the i7-14700T's multi-core performance lead.

Cache configurations also diverge. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core. However, the L2 cache is 2 MB per core on the i7-14700T versus 1.25 MB per core on the i5-14490F. The L3 cache totals 33 MB shared on the i7-14700T compared to 24 MB shared on the i5-14490F. These larger caches likely contribute to the i7-14700T's better performance in data compression and sorting tasks, which benefit from more on-chip storage.

Memory support is the same for both: DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. PCIe connectivity is also identical, with Gen 5 support and 16 lanes from the CPU. The i7-14700T includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-14490F has no integrated graphics. This is a functional difference for systems without a discrete GPU. The i7-14700T supports ECC memory, while the i5-14490F does not, which could matter for workstation reliability. Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700 and have locked multipliers.

Specification Differences

The most significant specification gap is core count: 20 versus 10 cores, with 28 versus 16 threads. Base clocks differ dramatically, with the i5-14490F at 2.50 GHz and the i7-14700T at 1.30 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the order slightly, with the i7-14700T reaching 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz for the i5-14490F. Thermal design power also differs, with the i5-14490F rated at 65 W and the i7-14700T at 35 W, an unusual inversion where the higher-core-count part consumes less rated power.

The L2 cache per core is 1.25 MB on the i5-14490F versus 2 MB on the i7-14700T. Total L3 cache is 24 MB versus 33 MB. The die size difference is 215 mm² versus 257 mm². The i7-14700T includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 and ECC memory support, while the i5-14490F has neither. Release dates differ by about a week, with the i5-14490F listed as 2023-12-31 and the i7-14700T as 2024-01-07. The i7-14700T has a launch MSRP of $384. Both processors are active production parts with locked multipliers, and their part numbers are SRN35 for the i5-14490F and SRN41 for the i7-14700T.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 25,980 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 23,000. This gives the i7-14700T an 11.5% advantage.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the i5-14490F outperforms the i7-14700T?

A: Yes, the i5-14490F wins in PassMark extended instructions by 8.4% (21,731 versus 20,052) and in PassMark physics by 7.6% (2,093 versus 1,946).

Q: What is the single-threaded performance difference between these two CPUs?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i7-14700T scores 3,667 versus 3,247 for the i5-14490F, an 11.5% lead. In PassMark single-thread, the gap narrows to 0.8%, with scores of 3,905 and 3,873.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. This doubling of core count is the main reason for the i7-14700T's multi-core dominance.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: Only the i7-14700T includes integrated graphics, specifically UHD Graphics 770. The i5-14490F has no integrated graphics at all.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41,914, which is 9.9% higher than the i5-14490F's 38,149. The i7-14700T ranks at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-14490F ranks at the 86th percentile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-14490F
i7-14700T
Core Specs
Cores
10
20 +100.0%
Threads
16
28 +75.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.5
1.3 -48.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.5
1.3 -48.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
25
13 -48.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
35 -46.2%
PL1
65 W
35 W
PL2
148 W
106 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Codename
Raptor Lake-R
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
900 MHz up to 3.7 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.0 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$384
Part Number
SRN35
SRN41
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core i5-14490F Details View Core i7-14700T Details