Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core i5-14401TE and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win count for each processor is zero. This means no side-by-side test scores exist for these two specific parts in the current dataset.

However, the Core Ultra 7 265F has a substantial set of benchmark results across multiple test suites. The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries at all in the database, which limits direct numerical comparison. The available data allows for analysis of the Core Ultra 7 265F on its own merits, and the specification differences provide context for expected performance gaps.

The Core Ultra 7 265F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 and a single-core score of 5926. In Cinebench R20, it scores 17631 multi-core and 2488 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 4231 multi-core and 597 single-core. PassMark tests further characterize the processor: multi-thread score of 49410, single-thread score of 4750, integer math at 138078, floating point math at 173855, data compression at 507018, data encryption at 39468, extended instructions at 39235, find prime numbers at 416, physics at 3172, and random string sorting at 62439.

The Core Ultra 7 265F sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 64438. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with an average score of 64640, which is 0.3% higher. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, putting the Core Ultra 7 265F 0.4% ahead. The AMD EPYC 4464P reaches 64823, which is 0.6% above the Core Ultra 7 265F. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64051, meaning the Core Ultra 7 265F outperforms it by 0.6%.

The Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, which indicates a median position in the overall distribution, but this is not derived from measured workloads in the current data. The absence of test results means the database cannot confirm its performance standing relative to the Core Ultra 7 265F with any numerical precision.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two processors. The Core Ultra 7 265F has extensive measured performance across rendering, math, encryption, and sorting workloads. The Core i5-14401TE has zero recorded benchmarks. Any selection between the two must rely on the specification sheet and the confirmed performance of the Core Ultra 7 265F.

The Core Ultra 7 265F targets users who need high multi-threaded throughput. Its 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, place it in the top 7% of all CPUs in the database by percentile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 41980 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49410 confirm strong parallel processing capability. The single-thread Cinebench R23 score of 5926 also indicates excellent per-core performance for lightly threaded applications.

The Core i5-14401TE, with 6 cores and 12 threads, a 4.50 GHz boost clock, and a 45 W TDP, appears suited for power-conscious desktop builds. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests mid-range positioning, but the database lacks test scores to validate this. The 20 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support define a more modest memory and cache profile compared to the Core Ultra 7 265F's 30 MB shared L3 cache and DDR5-only support with 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Strictly from the data, the Core Ultra 7 265F is the only one of the two with verified performance. Users requiring maximum throughput, higher core counts, and newer architecture should select it. Users constrained by power limits might consider the Core i5-14401TE, but no benchmark evidence in the database supports a performance claim for that part.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F?

A: The average benchmark score is 64438, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average score of 64640, which is 0.3% higher than the Core Ultra 7 265F's 64438.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Core i5-14401TE, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of the Core Ultra 7 265F?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 41980, and the single-core score is 5926.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 W, while the Core Ultra 7 265F has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265F support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory support is false for the Core Ultra 7 265F. The Core i5-14401TE does support ECC memory.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the Core i5-14401TE and 2.40 GHz for the Core Ultra 7 265F. Boost clocks are 4.50 GHz and 5.30 GHz, respectively. TDP values are 45 W versus 65 W.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. The Core i5-14401TE uses 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 7 265F uses 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: the Core i5-14401TE accepts both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 7 265F supports DDR5 only. The Core Ultra 7 265F has a listed memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s; the Core i5-14401TE has no bandwidth figure recorded.

PCIe lane counts also differ. The Core i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 7 265F provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the Core Ultra 7 265F lists N/A for integrated graphics.

Sockets are distinct: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core i5-14401TE and Intel Socket 1851 for the Core Ultra 7 265F. Release dates are June 30, 2024 for the Core i5-14401TE and January 6, 2025 for the Core Ultra 7 265F. The Core Ultra 7 265F has a launch MSRP of $379. The Core i5-14401TE has no launch MSRP recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are Q4T4SRNJP for the Core i5-14401TE and SRQCV for the Core Ultra 7 265F.

Architecture Differences

The Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, from the Core i5 generation (Raptor Lake Refresh). It is built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The die size is 215 mm². The Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, from the Ultra 7 generation. It is built on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. The die size is 243 mm², and the transistor count is 17,800 million. The Core i5-14401TE does not have a recorded transistor count.

The cache architecture reflects the generational shift. The Core Ultra 7 265F has more than double the L1 per core (192 KB versus 80 KB), more than double the L2 per core (3 MB versus 1.25 MB), and 50% more shared L3 (30 MB versus 20 MB). The memory controller also differs: the Core Ultra 7 265F is DDR5-only with a rated 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core i5-14401TE supports older DDR4 alongside DDR5 without a bandwidth figure.

ECC memory support is present on the Core i5-14401TE but absent on the Core Ultra 7 265F. The PCIe implementation is similar in generation (Gen 5) but differs in lane count, with the Core Ultra 7 265F offering 20 lanes versus 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are present only on the Core i5-14401TE (UHD Graphics 730), while the Core Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics listed.

The foundry change from Intel to TSMC, the process node shrink from 10 nm to 3 nm, and the core count increase from 6 to 20 define the architectural gap. The Core Ultra 7 265F also has a higher base and boost clock despite the larger core count, indicating a fundamentally different design target. The release date difference of roughly six months places the Core Ultra 7 265F as the newer part.