Intel Core i5-14401TE vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no benchmark entries for either the Intel Core i5-14401TE or the Intel Core i5-14501E. Neither processor has a single benchmark score in the database, and the head-to-head comparison table is empty. The average benchmark score for both parts is zero, and each holds a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs tracked. With zero wins recorded for either side, the numeric comparison rests entirely on the specification differences between the two models rather than measured performance results.

The absence of benchmark data means there are no exact performance deltas to cite. No multi-core or single-core scores exist to compare, and no nearest rival data is available for either processor. The database currently treats both CPUs as equivalent in ranking terms, with the same 50th percentile placement. This parity in percentile does not reflect measured performance, since both entries lack any underlying benchmark results. The practical takeaway from the data is that performance conclusions cannot be drawn from measurements, only from the architectural and specification gaps listed below.

Architecture Differences

Both processors belong to Intel's Core 14th Gen series and share the Raptor Lake architecture, with the Raptor Lake-R codename. They are built on the same 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, and both use the Intel Socket 1700. The die size for each is identical at 215 mm². Each chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, with no hypervisor-level distinction in core count. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core on both, and the L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core on both. The integrated graphics differ: the i5-14401TE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The core clock speeds are where the architecture diverges in practice. The i5-14401TE has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The i5-14501E runs a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. That is a 1.30 GHz higher base clock and a 0.70 GHz higher boost clock for the i5-14501E. Thermal design power also differs: the i5-14401TE is rated at 45 W, while the i5-14501E is rated at 65 W. The L3 cache is not shared equally: the i5-14401TE has 20 MB shared, while the i5-14501E has 24 MB shared, a 4 MB advantage for the latter.

Both chips are locked, with no unlocked multiplier, and both were released on the same date in the database: 2024-06-30. Neither has a launch MSRP listed. The part numbers differ: Q4T4SRNJP for the i5-14401TE and Q49HSRNJM for the i5-14501E. The market segment for both is desktop, and both are listed as active production parts. The generation field is identical for both: Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

Where Each One Wins

The i5-14501E delivers higher clock speeds across the board. The base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz gives it a 65% higher base frequency, and the boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 4.50 GHz gives it a 15.6% higher peak frequency. For workloads that scale with clock speed, particularly lightly threaded tasks such as everyday desktop responsiveness, single-threaded applications, and older games that rely on high per-core performance, the i5-14501E has the clear specification advantage. The 24 MB L3 cache versus 20 MB also helps with data-heavy workloads that fit within the larger cache, reducing memory traffic.

The i5-14401TE counters with a lower thermal envelope. At 45 W versus 65 W, it consumes 20 W less under its rated TDP. For systems where heat dissipation is constrained, such as small form factor builds, passively cooled cases, or industrial PCs running in confined spaces, the lower TDP allows for simpler cooling solutions. The base clock of 2.00 GHz suggests the i5-14401TE is designed to idle or run light loads at lower power draw, which can translate into lower sustained temperatures and quieter operation. The i5-14401TE also uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770; the latter is the higher-tier iGPU, but both are integrated solutions without a discrete GPU.

For gaming, the i5-14501E is positioned better on paper. The higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz directly benefits frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The larger L3 cache also helps with game data that cycles through cache frequently. The i5-14401TE, with its 4.50 GHz boost clock, would lag in those scenarios, though the gap is less pronounced in multi-threaded workloads where both chips have the same core and thread counts. For productivity tasks like video encoding or compilation, the identical 6-core, 12-thread configuration means the i5-14501E's clock advantage remains the primary differentiator, giving it a lead across the board.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear specification hierarchy. The i5-14501E is the faster processor by every clock and cache metric: 3.30 GHz base versus 2.00 GHz, 5.20 GHz boost versus 4.50 GHz, and 24 MB L3 versus 20 MB. It also carries a higher TDP of 65 W versus 45 W, which is the trade-off for that performance. The i5-14401TE is the lower-power part, suited for environments where 45 W is the hard ceiling and where the 2.00 GHz base clock can be accepted for the benefit of reduced heat output.

Buyers who prioritize raw processing speed should select the i5-14501E. The higher boost clock alone justifies that choice for any workload that reacts to frequency, and the larger L3 cache reduces the penalty of memory latency. Buyers who prioritize thermal constraints and power limits should select the i5-14401TE. The 45 W TDP is the lower of the two, and the 2.00 GHz base clock indicates a more conservative power profile. There is no benchmark data to confirm real-world performance, so the decision rests on these specification gaps.

Neither part has a price listed in the database, so no cost-based guidance can be offered. Both are locked, so overclocking is not an option to close the gap. Both support ECC memory, which points to workstation or server use cases. Both use the same socket, so a motherboard that accepts one will accept the other, assuming the BIOS supports both. The integrated graphics difference is minor: UHD Graphics 770 on the i5-14501E is a higher tier than UHD Graphics 730 on the i5-14401TE, but both are for display output rather than gaming.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Are the core counts the same on both chips?

A: Yes, both the i5-14401TE and i5-14501E have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 W, and the i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the i5-14401TE and i5-14501E support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The i5-14501E has 24 MB shared L3 cache, while the i5-14401TE has 20 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: Are both processors from the same generation?

A: Yes, both belong to Intel's Core 14th Gen series and use the Raptor Lake architecture.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core i5-14401TE | Intel Core i5-14501E |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Part Number | Q4T4SRNJP | Q49HSRNJM |