AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core i5-14401TE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head test results between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core i5-14401TE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors are at zero. This absence of comparative data means the analysis must rely on the recorded scores for the AMD processor and the architectural and specification differences between the two units to infer relative performance.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a comprehensive set of recorded benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multicore score of 14784 and a single-core score of 1724. In the older Cinebench R15 test, it scores 2458 in multicore and 271.5 in single-core. PassMark results show a multithread score of 26646, a single-thread score of 3692, integer math at 93342, floating-point math at 55739, extended instructions at 22298, data encryption at 18838, data compression at 311199, physics at 1351, find prime numbers at 84, and random string sorting at 37922. The average benchmark score for this processor is 39603, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking.

Given the lack of direct comparisons, the database shows that the AMD processor holds a significant advantage in raw measured performance across all available tests. The Cinebench R23 multicore result of 14784 indicates strong parallel processing capability. The single-core score of 1724 in the same test suggests competitive per-thread performance. The Intel processor, with an average score of zero, cannot be directly compared numerically, but the data strongly implies the AMD part outperforms it in every measurable category.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS provide context for its performance level. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average score of 39485, which is 0.3% lower than the 8840HS. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D scores 39768, placing it 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is nearly identical with a score of 39325, just 0.7% lower. The AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39215, which is 1% lower. These narrow deltas show that the 8840HS sits firmly within a tight performance cluster among AMD parts, with differences of less than one percent in most cases. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, with no recorded scores, does not appear in any rival lists.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has an average benchmark score of 39603, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14401TE. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile ranking is 50th.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare to its closest rivals?

A: The 8840HS is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4245P.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 14784, and the single-core score is 1724.

Q: Which processor has a higher core count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core i5-14401TE have ECC memory support listed as true.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point, built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel. This process node difference is substantial. The AMD processor uses a more advanced manufacturing process, which typically enables higher efficiency and density. The Intel processor uses a larger 10 nm node, which generally results in lower transistor density and higher power consumption for similar performance.

The AMD processor integrates 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The Intel processor has no recorded transistor count but has a die size of 215 mm². The AMD die is smaller despite containing a massive number of transistors, reflecting the density advantage of the 4 nm node. The Intel die is larger, which can indicate a less dense design or additional integrated components.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has a larger cache allocation per core and a larger total L3 cache, which can benefit workloads with high data reuse. The AMD processor has more cores but less cache per core.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. The AMD processor's higher memory bandwidth is a measurable advantage for memory-intensive tasks.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Radeon 780M, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the UHD Graphics 730. The PCIe support also varies. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel part has a newer PCIe standard but fewer lanes.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and Intel Core i5-14401TE differ across several core specifications. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clock speeds are 3.30 GHz for the AMD part and 2.00 GHz for the Intel part. The boost clock speeds are 5.10 GHz for the AMD part and 4.50 GHz for the Intel part. The AMD processor has higher clocks both at base and boost.

Thermal design power differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts. This indicates the AMD processor is designed for lower power operation, consistent with its mobile market segment. The Intel processor is a desktop part with a higher power envelope.

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segments differ, with the AMD processor listed as Mobile and the Intel processor listed as Desktop. Release dates also differ, with the AMD processor released on 2024-04-15 and the Intel processor released on 2024-06-30.

Both processors have ECC memory support and are not multiplier unlocked. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. The part numbers differ, with the AMD processor listing two part numbers and the Intel processor listing one. Both are marked as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The data in the database points to a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has extensive benchmark results showing strong performance, with an average score of 39603 and an 87th percentile ranking. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores recorded, leaving its actual performance unmeasured in the database. The AMD processor also has more cores, more threads, higher base and boost clocks, and a lower TDP. These factors combine to suggest that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the stronger performer in almost every aspect.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE does have advantages in certain areas. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering more flexibility in system configuration. Its PCIe Gen 5 support is newer than the AMD processor's Gen 4. The larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to 16 MB could benefit specific workloads. However, without any benchmark scores to quantify its performance, the database cannot confirm that these architectural advantages translate into real-world wins.

The AMD processor's position at the 87th percentile and its proximity to other high-scoring AMD parts like the Ryzen 7 9800X3D (0.4% higher) and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (0.7% lower) show that it is a competitive processor within its class. The Intel processor's 50th percentile ranking, based on no recorded scores, places it in the middle of the database distribution, but this is a default position rather than a measured result.

Users seeking a mobile processor with verified high performance should look at the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. The data supports its capability across single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE remains an unverified quantity in the database, and its selection would rely on specifications alone rather than measured outcomes.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS wins in all measured benchmark categories. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14784 and single-core score of 1724 show strength in both parallel and sequential tasks. PassMark results further support this, with high scores in integer math at 93342, floating-point math at 55739, and data compression at 311199. The processor's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with the 4 nm process node and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, make it suitable for demanding computational workloads. Its 28-watt TDP also indicates efficiency for a mobile platform.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark wins in the database because no scores are recorded. Its potential advantages are purely architectural. The support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows system builders to choose between older and newer memory standards. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides a newer, faster connection standard for compatible devices. The larger L3 cache of 20 MB and larger L1 and L2 caches per core could theoretically benefit cache-sensitive workloads, but this remains unverified by any recorded test.

The AMD processor is the clear choice for users who prioritize measured performance, as all available data points to its superiority. The Intel processor may appeal to users who need DDR4 memory support or PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, but the lack of benchmark data means its actual performance cannot be confirmed. The database shows the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS as a high-performing, efficient mobile processor, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE stands as a desktop part with unverified capabilities.