Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data presents a clear split between these two Intel processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins the majority of head-to-head comparisons, taking 14 of the 17 recorded tests, while the Intel Core i5-13600T secures three wins. The most decisive victory for the Ultra 5 336H appears in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 299 against the i5-13600T's 82, a delta of -72.6% in favor of the Ultra 5. This is an exceptional margin, indicating a fundamental advantage in integer-heavy prime calculation workloads. Similarly, the Ultra 5 336H leads in PassMark physics by a wide margin, scoring 2682 versus 1287, a 52% advantage. The floating-point math test also swings heavily toward the Ultra 5, with scores of 82415 versus 70152, a 14.9% edge. The Ultra 5 further dominates in extended instructions (24542 vs 20651, a 15.9% gap) and data encryption (21291 vs 19320, a 9.3% edge).

The i5-13600T counters with its own notable wins. Its largest margin comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 96299 against the Ultra 5's 62070, a 55.1% advantage. This is a substantial reversal, showing that the i5-13600T excels in integer-heavy arithmetic workloads. Data compression also favors the i5-13600T significantly, with a score of 337893 versus 280340, a 20.5% lead. The third win for the i5-13600T is in random string sorting, with 36413 against 34402, a smaller 5.8% margin.

Across the Cinebench suite, the Ultra 5 336H holds a consistent but narrow lead. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ultra 5 scores 2418 versus 2375, a 1.8% delta. The same 1.8% margin appears in R15 singlecore (341 vs 335), R20 multicore (10076 vs 9899), R20 singlecore (1422 vs 1397), R23 multicore (23991 vs 23571), and R23 singlecore (3387 vs 3327). These are close results, suggesting that in pure rendering workloads, the two processors are nearly equivalent, with the Ultra 5 holding a slight edge. The PassMark multithread test shows a similar pattern, with the Ultra 5 at 28545 versus 27098, a 5.1% lead. Single-thread PassMark results also favor the Ultra 5, with 4013 versus 3728, a 7.1% gap.

The overall average benchmark score reflects these results. The i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35305, while the Ultra 5 336H sits at 34485. Despite the Ultra 5 winning more individual tests, the i5-13600T's large integer math and data compression wins pull its average higher. The i5-13600T sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Ultra 5 is at the 84th percentile, a marginal difference in overall standing.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data suggests distinct use-case advantages for each processor. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the stronger choice for scientific computing and physics simulations. The PassMark physics score of 2682 versus 1287 is a 52% advantage, indicating a major edge in physics-based calculations. The prime number finding test, with a 72.6% lead, points to strengths in cryptography-related or number-theoretic workloads. The floating-point math advantage (14.9%) and extended instructions lead (15.9%) further reinforce the Ultra 5's suitability for computationally intensive scientific applications. The Ultra 5 also excels in encryption tasks, with a 9.3% edge, making it preferable for security-related workloads.

The Intel Core i5-13600T, by contrast, is the clear winner in integer-heavy data processing. The 55.1% lead in integer math is the largest margin in any test, indicating strong performance in general-purpose arithmetic that does not rely heavily on floating-point operations. Data compression is another strong suit, with a 20.5% advantage, making the i5-13600T a better fit for file archiving, database compression, or any workload that involves data packing and unpacking. The random string sorting win, though smaller at 5.8%, suggests an edge in sorting algorithms and text processing tasks.

For rendering workloads, the two are nearly tied. Cinebench R23 multicore scores differ by only 1.8%, with the Ultra 5 at 23991 and the i5-13600T at 23571. This means that for 3D rendering or video encoding, users would see little practical difference between the two. However, the Ultra 5's consistent single-core lead, including a 7.1% advantage in PassMark single-thread, suggests it may feel slightly more responsive in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing or office productivity. The i5-13600T's higher thread count (20 versus 16) does not translate into a multicore win in Cinebench, which is notable given that the i5-13600T has more threads available.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different architectural generations and design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-13600T is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-S desktop variant, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture, with the Panther Lake-H mobile variant, fabricated on a 3 nm process node, also at Intel. The process node difference is significant: 10 nm versus 3 nm, with the Ultra 5 using a much more advanced manufacturing process.

Core configurations differ substantially. The i5-13600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The i5-13600T's higher thread count suggests it uses a hybrid core arrangement with performance and efficiency cores, allowing hyper-threading on some cores. The Ultra 5, with 16 threads matching its 16 cores, appears to lack hyper-threading, meaning each core handles a single thread. This is a notable design choice that affects how the two processors handle parallel workloads.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The i5-13600T has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1.25 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 24 MB. The Ultra 5 336H has a larger L1 cache at 192 KB per core, a larger L2 cache at 2.5 MB per core, but a smaller shared L3 cache at 18 MB. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the Ultra 5 may contribute to its strong single-thread performance, while the i5-13600T's larger L3 cache benefits workloads that share data across cores. The die size for the i5-13600T is 215 mm², while the Ultra 5's die size is not recorded.

Memory support differs as well. The i5-13600T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel. The Ultra 5 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, while no such figure is available for the i5-13600T. The i5-13600T supports ECC memory, while the Ultra 5 does not, making the i5-13600T more suitable for error-sensitive workloads. PCIe connectivity also varies: the i5-13600T offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Ultra 5 offers Gen 5 with 12 lanes, both CPU-only. The i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 uses Intel BGA 2540, reflecting the desktop versus mobile market split. The i5-13600T has an integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 5 has Intel Xe3 Graphics. The i5-13600T was released on 2023-01-03, while the Ultra 5 was released on 2026-01-04.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has a higher average benchmark score of 35305, compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H's 34485.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H leads with a score of 23991, while the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 23571, a 1.8% difference favoring the Ultra 5.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has more cores (16 versus 14), but the Intel Core i5-13600T has more threads (20 versus 16).

Q: What is the largest single benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest margin is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 299 versus the i5-13600T's 82, a 72.6% difference.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not.

Q: What process nodes are used by each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T uses a 10 nm process node, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses a 3 nm process node.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core i5-13600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 1800.00 MHz for the i5-13600T and 1.90 GHz for the Ultra 5. Boost clocks are 4.80 GHz for the i5-13600T and 4.60 GHz for the Ultra 5. The i5-13600T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Ultra 5 has a TDP of 25 watts. The i5-13600T uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the Ultra 5 uses Intel BGA 2540. Architecture differs, with the i5-13600T using Raptor Lake and the Ultra 5 using Panther Lake. The i5-13600T is built on a 10 nm process, while the Ultra 5 is on a 3 nm process. The i5-13600T has a die size of 215 mm², while the Ultra 5's die size is not recorded. Cache configurations differ: the i5-13600T has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3; the Ultra 5 has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. Memory support differs, with the i5-13600T supporting DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The i5-13600T has no recorded memory bandwidth, while the Ultra 5 has 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the i5-13600T but not on the Ultra 5. PCIe lanes differ: 16 lanes for the i5-13600T versus 12 lanes for the Ultra 5, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for the i5-13600T and Intel Xe3 Graphics for the Ultra 5. The i5-13600T is a desktop processor, while the Ultra 5 is a mobile processor. The i5-13600T has a launch MSRP of $255, while the Ultra 5 has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors are currently active in production.