Intel Core i5-1350P vs Intel Xeon W-2145 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-1350P wins every recorded benchmark against the Intel Xeon W-2145, and the margins are consistent across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i5-1350P scores 1664 against the Xeon W-2145's 1542, a 7.9% advantage. The single-core R15 result is similarly one-sided: 234 versus 217, a 7.8% lead. These are not isolated outliers; the pattern holds across every test generation.

Cinebench R20 multicore shows the Core i5-1350P at 6935, while the Xeon W-2145 manages 6425, again a 7.9% gap. In R20 single-core, the Core i5-1350P posts 979 versus 906, the largest percentage margin in any test at 8.1%. The R23 results mirror this trend: multi-core 16514 against 15299 (7.9% ahead), and single-core 2331 against 2159 (8.0% ahead). Across all six head-to-head comparisons, the Core i5-1350P records six wins and zero losses. The average benchmark score reinforces this: the Core i5-1350P sits at 4776, while the Xeon W-2145 trails at 4576, a difference of 200 points.

The Xeon W-2145 does have one additional benchmark in its own record, a Geekbench multi-core score of 8712 and a single-core score of 1345, but these cannot be compared directly because the Core i5-1350P does not have Geekbench results in the database. The head-to-head data is unambiguous: the Core i5-1350P outperforms the Xeon W-2145 in every shared test, with margins ranging from 7.8% to 8.1%. The consistency of these deltas suggests a structural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i5-1350P wins in all scenarios where the recorded benchmarks apply. It leads in both single-core and multi-core Cinebench tests across R15, R20, and R23. This means the Core i5-1350P has the edge for tasks that rely on per-thread performance, such as lightly threaded applications, and also for heavily threaded workloads like rendering or video encoding. Its percentile ranking places it at 59, just one point above the Xeon W-2145's 58, which is a narrow margin but consistent with the benchmark deltas.

The Xeon W-2145 does not win any of the six head-to-head comparisons. However, its profile shows strengths outside those tests. It supports ECC memory, a feature the Core i5-1350P lacks, and it offers quad-channel memory with 85.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The Core i5-1350P has dual-channel memory and no bandwidth figure recorded. For workloads that stress memory throughput, such as large database operations or scientific computing, the Xeon W-2145's platform features could compensate for its lower raw CPU scores. The Xeon W-2145 also has a larger PCIe lane count, 48 lanes of Gen 3, versus the Core i5-1350P's 20 lanes of Gen 4, which matters for systems with many expansion cards or GPUs.

In terms of production status, the Core i5-1350P is active, while the Xeon W-2145 is end-of-life. This means the Core i5-1350P is the only one of the two currently positioned for new deployments, whereas the Xeon W-2145 would be a legacy or second-hand choice. The launch MSRP of the Xeon W-2145 is $1113, and the Core i5-1350P has a launch MSRP of $320, but pricing is not a factor in the benchmark analysis.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design philosophies. The Core i5-1350P uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node, while the Xeon W-2145 uses Skylake architecture on a 14 nm node. The Core i5-1350P has 12 cores and 16 threads, whereas the Xeon W-2145 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Xeon W-2145 matches the thread count through hyper-threading, but the Core i5-1350P's additional physical cores contribute to its multi-core wins.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The Core i5-1350P has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The Xeon W-2145 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 11 MB of shared L3. The Core i5-1350P therefore has both more cache per core and a larger total L3 pool. The die size also favors the Xeon W-2145, which is listed at 484 mm², but this is a function of the older 14 nm process and larger physical footprint; the Core i5-1350P has no recorded die size.

The Core i5-1350P supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Xeon W-2145 supports only DDR4. The memory bus is dual-channel on the Core i5-1350P and quad-channel on the Xeon W-2145, which gives the Xeon W-2145 a theoretical bandwidth advantage of 85.3 GB/s versus an unrecorded figure for the Core i5-1350P. The Xeon W-2145 also supports ECC memory, which is absent on the Core i5-1350P. The integrated graphics are another split: the Core i5-1350P includes Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the Xeon W-2145 has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

PCIe capabilities differ in generation and lane count. The Core i5-1350P provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Xeon W-2145 provides Gen 3 with 48 lanes. The newer Gen 4 standard offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the Xeon W-2145 has over twice the lane count for multi-device systems. The Core i5-1350P uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, indicating a mobile or embedded form factor, while the Xeon W-2145 uses Intel Socket 2066, a desktop/workstation platform. The market segments confirm this: the Core i5-1350P is marked Mobile, and the Xeon W-2145 is Server/Workstation. Release dates also tell the story: the Core i5-1350P launched in January 2023, while the Xeon W-2145 launched in August 2017, a gap of over five years.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-1350P has an average benchmark score of 4776, while the Intel Xeon W-2145 has an average score of 4576, a difference of 200 points in favor of the Core i5-1350P.

Q: How much faster is the Core i5-1350P in single-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Core i5-1350P scores 2331 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the Xeon W-2145 scores 2159, giving the Core i5-1350P an 8.0% lead.

Q: Does the Xeon W-2145 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon W-2145 supports ECC memory. The Core i5-1350P does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth advantage of the Xeon W-2145?

A: The Xeon W-2145 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, enabled by its quad-channel memory bus. The Core i5-1350P has a dual-channel memory bus with no recorded bandwidth figure.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Xeon W-2145 has 48 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, while the Core i5-1350P has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Xeon W-2145 offers more lanes, but the Core i5-1350P uses a newer PCIe generation.

Q: Is the Core i5-1350P still in production?

A: The Core i5-1350P has an active production status. The Xeon W-2145 is listed as end-of-life.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-1350P | Intel Xeon W-2145 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 1900.00 MHz | 3700.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 140 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 2066 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Skylake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 484 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 11 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Quad-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 85.3 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | false | true |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 3, 48 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2017-08-28 |

| Launch MSRP | $320 | $1113 |

The base clocks are a notable inversion: the Xeon W-2145 starts at 3700 MHz versus the Core i5-1350P's 1900 MHz, yet the Core i5-1350P boosts higher at 4.70 GHz against 4.50 GHz. The TDP difference is substantial as well, with the Xeon W-2145 drawing 140 W versus the Core i5-1350P's 28 W, reflecting the mobile versus workstation design targets.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i5-1350P as the faster processor in every benchmark the database records. It wins all six head-to-head comparisons, with margins between 7.8% and 8.1%, and holds a higher average benchmark score of 4776 versus 4576. Its percentile rank of 59 also edges out the Xeon W-2145's 58. For any workload measured by Cinebench, the Core i5-1350P is the clear choice, whether the task is single-threaded or multi-threaded.

The Xeon W-2145 has a different set of strengths that are not captured in the Cinebench comparisons. It supports ECC memory, offers quad-channel memory with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth, and provides 48 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, which are all features aimed at server and workstation environments. The Core i5-1350P lacks ECC, uses dual-channel memory, and has only 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Xeon W-2145 also has a higher base clock of 3700 MHz versus 1900 MHz, though the Core i5-1350P boosts higher at 4.70 GHz.

The production statuses are decisive for practical selection. The Core i5-1350P is active and current, whereas the Xeon W-2145 is end-of-life. The Core i5-1350P also integrates Iris Xe Graphics, eliminating the need for a separate GPU in basic display scenarios, while the Xeon W-2145 requires a discrete graphics solution. The Core i5-1350P's 10 nm process node and newer Raptor Lake architecture give it a generational edge in efficiency and raw performance, despite the Xeon W-2145's higher TDP and larger die size.

Buyers seeking raw computational speed, modern platform features, and an active product should select the Core i5-1350P. Buyers needing ECC memory, high memory bandwidth, or extensive PCIe lane counts for specialized workstation tasks should consider the Xeon W-2145, accepting its lower benchmark scores and end-of-life status. The benchmark data is unambiguous, but the platform features tell a more nuanced story. The Core i5-1350P is the better processor by the numbers; the Xeon W-2145 is the better platform for specific enterprise requirements.