Intel Core i5-1350P vs Intel Xeon E-2356G Comparison
Intel Core i5-1350P
Xeon E-2356G
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-1350P vs Intel Xeon E-2356G
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a clean sweep in the head-to-head comparison: the Intel Core i5-1350P wins all six benchmark entries, while the Intel Xeon E-2356G records zero wins. The margin is consistent across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads, with the i5-1350P leading by roughly 5% in every test.
In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-1350P scores 1664 against the Xeon E-2356G's 1575, a delta of -5.3% from the Xeon's perspective. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 234 for the i5-1350P versus 222 for the Xeon, a -5.1% gap. These are the smallest deltas in the set, but the direction is consistent.
Moving to Cinebench R20, the i5-1350P extends its lead slightly. The multi-core score is 6935 against 6565, a -5.3% difference, while the single-core score is 979 versus 926, a -5.4% gap. The R23 results mirror this: the i5-1350P posts 16514 in multi-core versus 15632, and 2331 in single-core versus 2206, both at -5.3% and -5.4% respectively.
The average benchmark score in the database reinforces this picture. The Xeon E-2356G sits at 4548, placing it in the 58th percentile of all CPUs. The i5-1350P averages 4776, placing it in the 59th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Xeon include the Intel Core i7-10700KF at 4547 (delta 0%), the Intel Core i5-1340P at 4545 (delta 0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 at 4532 (delta 0.4%), while the Intel Xeon W-2145 trails at 4576 with a -0.6% delta. For the i5-1350P, the nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon W-1290E at 4775 (delta 0%), the AMD EPYC 7252 at 4772 (delta 0.1%), with the Intel Xeon E-2386G at 4799 (-0.5%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X at 4807 (-0.6%) slightly ahead.
The data indicates that the i5-1350P outperforms the Xeon E-2356G by a narrow but repeatable margin across every recorded workload. The consistency of the -5.3% to -5.4% delta suggests a systematic advantage rather than a workload-specific anomaly. Neither processor shows a single benchmark where it pulls ahead; the database records no wins for the Xeon in this matchup.
The Verdict
Based strictly on the recorded benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-1350P is the faster processor in this comparison. It wins all six head-to-head tests, and its average score of 4776 exceeds the Xeon E-2356G's 4548 by roughly 5%. The i5-1350P also holds a higher percentile ranking at 59 versus 58.
The Xeon E-2356G, however, is not without a role. Its market segment is Server/Workstation, and it supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the i5-1350P. The Xeon also uses the Intel Socket 1200 platform with a 14 nm process node, while the i5-1350P is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1744 with a 10 nm node. The i5-1350P carries a 28 W TDP against the Xeon's 80 W, making it the more power-efficient option on paper, though the database does not provide thermal or power consumption measurements.
For a user prioritizing raw benchmark performance in the recorded tests, the i5-1350P is the clear choice. For a user requiring ECC memory support and a server-class platform, the Xeon E-2356G is the only one of the two that qualifies. The i5-1350P has more cores (12 versus 6) and more threads (16 versus 12), which likely contributes to its multi-core lead, but the single-core lead also points to architectural efficiency from Raptor Lake over Rocket Lake. The verdict is straightforward: the i5-1350P wins on performance, while the Xeon wins on platform features relevant to workstation reliability.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i5-1350P has an average benchmark score of 4776, compared to the Intel Xeon E-2356G's 4548. The i5-1350P also ranks in the 59th percentile of all CPUs, one point higher than the Xeon's 58th.
Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in any single test?
A: The largest gap is -5.4%, recorded in both Cinebench R20 single-core (979 vs 926) and Cinebench R23 single-core (2331 vs 2206). The multi-core tests show slightly smaller gaps of -5.3%.
Q: Does the Xeon E-2356G win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?
A: No. The database records winsA as 0 and winsB as 6, meaning the Intel Core i5-1350P wins all six head-to-head tests. The Xeon does not win a single recorded benchmark in this matchup.
Q: What memory features differentiate the two processors?
A: The Xeon E-2356G supports ECC memory and uses DDR4 with dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The i5-1350P supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but does not support ECC and has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.
Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?
A: The Xeon E-2356G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i5-1350P has 12 cores and 16 threads. The i5-1350P's higher core count aligns with its multi-core benchmark wins.
Q: What are the launch MSRP values for each processor?
A: The Xeon E-2356G has a launch MSRP of $311, and the i5-1350P has a launch MSRP of $320.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Xeon E-2356G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i5-1350P has 12 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds are recorded as 3.20 GHz for the Xeon and 1900.00 MHz for the i5-1350P, with boost clocks of 5.00 GHz and 4.70 GHz respectively. The TDP differs substantially: 80 W for the Xeon versus 28 W for the i5-1350P.
The socket types are incompatible: the Xeon uses Intel Socket 1200, while the i5-1350P uses Intel BGA 1744. The Xeon is a Server/Workstation part, while the i5-1350P is a Mobile part. Memory support differs, with the Xeon limited to DDR4 and the i5-1350P supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. The Xeon supports ECC memory, the i5-1350P does not. The Xeon has a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the i5-1350P has no recorded value. Both use Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes (CPU only), and both have locked multipliers.
The integrated graphics differ: the Xeon features UHD Graphics P750, while the i5-1350P features Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. The release dates are 2021-09-07 for the Xeon and 2023-01-03 for the i5-1350P. The launch MSRP is $311 for the Xeon and $320 for the i5-1350P. The part numbers are SRKN2 for the Xeon and SRMJ5 for the i5-1350P.
Architecture Differences
The Xeon E-2356G is built on the Rocket Lake architecture, specifically Rocket Lake-E, and belongs to the Xeon E-2300 series. The i5-1350P uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-P, and is part of the Core i5 generation. The Xeon uses a 14 nm process node, while the i5-1350P uses a 10 nm node, both fabricated by Intel.
The die size is recorded only for the Xeon at 276 mm², with no die size listed for the i5-1350P. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core. The L2 cache differs significantly: the Xeon has 512 KB per core, while the i5-1350P has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is the same at 12 MB shared for both processors.
The Xeon's generation is listed as "Xeon E (Rocket Lake-E)", while the i5-1350P's generation is "Core i5 (Raptor Lake-P)". The Xeon supports ECC memory, the i5-1350P does not. The Xeon supports DDR4 only, while the i5-1350P supports DDR4 and DDR5. The integrated graphics are different as noted, with the Xeon using UHD Graphics P750 and the i5-1350P using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. Both are active production parts with locked multipliers.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i5-1350P wins in every recorded benchmark test. This includes all six Cinebench entries across R15, R20, and R23, both multi-core and single-core. The i5-1350P also holds the higher average benchmark score and the higher percentile ranking. The data indicates the i5-1350P is the superior choice for raw compute performance in the tested workloads.
The Intel Xeon E-2356G does not win any benchmark, but it holds advantages in specific specification areas. It supports ECC memory, which is critical for data integrity in server and workstation environments. It uses a desktop socket (Intel Socket 1200) rather than a mobile BGA package, which may be relevant for system builders. The Xeon has a higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus 4.70 GHz, though the i5-1350P still wins single-core tests. The Xeon also has a higher launch MSRP at $311, though the i5-1350P is close at $320.
For a user choosing between these two, the i5-1350P is the pick for benchmark performance, offering 12 cores and 16 threads with a 10 nm node and a lower 28 W TDP. The Xeon E-2356G is the pick for ECC memory support and a server-class platform, with 6 cores and 12 threads on a 14 nm node at 80 W. The database shows no scenario where the Xeon outperforms the i5-1350P in the recorded tests, so the decision rests on platform requirements rather than measured speed. The i5-1350P also supports DDR5 memory, which the Xeon does not, adding a future-proofing element to its profile.