Intel Core i5-1340P vs Intel Core i5-1350P Comparison

Intel Core i5-1340P vs Intel Core i5-1350P: the recorded data shows a clean sweep. The i5-1350P wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests by margins between 4.7 and 4.9 percent, despite the two chips being nearly identical on paper. Same architecture, same core count, same cache, same 28-watt TDP, same integrated graphics. The only meaningful specification separation is peak boost clock, where the i5-1350P reaches 4.70 GHz against 4.60 GHz for the i5-1340P, and that small advantage compounds into a consistent performance edge across every rendering test in the database. If both options exist in laptops at comparable configurations, the data points to the i5-1350P as the stronger processor, full stop.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-1350P is the pick based purely on measured performance. It wins every benchmark recorded in the database: 1664 versus 1584 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 6935 versus 6600 in R20 multi-core, and 16514 versus 15716 in R23 multi-core, along with single-core wins of similar magnitude. Its average benchmark score of 4776 sits 5.1 percent above the i5-1340P's 4545, and its percentile versus all CPUs in the database is 59, one point higher than the 58th percentile the i5-1340P occupies.

The i5-1340P's case is purely contextual. It matches the i5-1350P in every structural spec: 12 cores, 16 threads, 12 MB of shared L3 cache, DDR4 and DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, and Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. Anyone buying a pre-built laptop rather than a standalone chip is choosing the machine, not the processor, and a well-cooled i5-1340P design may outperform a thermally constrained i5-1350P in practice. But the recorded numbers leave no ambiguity: where both run to their rated capabilities, the i5-1350P finishes ahead every time. The launch MSRP of the i5-1340P is $353, while the i5-1350P launched at $320, and that is the only other data point separating them.

Architecture Differences

There is almost nothing to separate these two architecturally, and that is the story. Both processors are Intel Raptor Lake parts, codenamed Raptor Lake-P, built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Both belong to the Core i5 Raptor Lake-P generation, both launched on the same day, and both remain in active production as mobile-segment chips soldered to the Intel BGA 1744 socket.

The core topology is identical: 12 cores and 16 threads on each chip, a hybrid arrangement carried over from the Raptor Lake-P design, with a 1900 MHz base clock shared by both. Cache is likewise identical, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Memory support is the same dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 controller, neither part supports ECC memory, and both offer PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics solution is the same Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units on both.

The one architectural lever that differs is boost clock: 4.60 GHz on the i5-1340P versus 4.70 GHz on the i5-1350P. That single binning step is the entire performance story here, and the benchmark data shows it translating into a uniform advantage of roughly five percent across the board. Both chips carry a 28-watt TDP, so the i5-1350P's extra performance does not come at the cost of a higher power rating on paper. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, so the out-of-the-box gap is the gap buyers live with. Part numbers differ as expected, SRMJ7 for the i5-1340P and SRMJ5 for the i5-1350P, useful for identifying exactly which silicon is inside a given laptop.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-1350P wins everywhere the database measures. It wins in multi-core rendering, which matters for video encoding, 3D rendering, code compilation, and batch photo work: 16514 versus 15716 in Cinebench R23 multi-core is a 4.8 percent advantage that holds almost perfectly in the older R15 and R20 versions of the same test. It wins in single-core work too, posting 2331 versus 2218 in R23 single-core, a 4.8 percent gap that benefits lightly threaded applications such as office productivity, web browsing, and most game logic. The single-core wins matter here because the two chips share the same integrated Iris Xe graphics, meaning CPU-bound gaming scenarios will tilt toward the i5-1350P.

The i5-1340P's only wins are structural rather than measurable. It matches its sibling in cache, memory support, PCIe connectivity, graphics, and power rating, so it never loses on platform features; it simply loses on speed. For workloads that never engage the boost clock, or in thermally limited thin-and-light chassis where sustained clocks fall below maximum boost, the practical difference between the two shrinks toward zero. The recorded data also shows the i5-1340P holding its own against its own nearest rivals: it sits within 0.7 percent of the Intel Core i7-10700KF, the Intel Xeon E-2356G, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748, and the Intel Core i5-1250P on average benchmark score. That context matters. The i5-1340P is not a slow chip; it is simply outrun by a sibling that is one bin higher.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster overall?

A: The Intel Core i5-1350P. It won all six recorded head-to-head benchmarks with margins between 4.7 and 4.9 percent, and its average benchmark score of 4776 exceeds the i5-1340P's 4545 by 5.1 percent.

Q: What is the difference in single-core performance?

A: The i5-1350P scores 234 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 979 in R20 single-core, and 2331 in R23 single-core, versus 223, 931, and 2218 for the i5-1340P. That is a consistent gap of roughly 4.7 to 4.9 percent in the i5-1350P's favor.

Q: Do they have the same core count and cache?

A: Yes. Both have 12 cores, 16 threads, 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Cache is not a differentiator between these two.

Q: Why is the i5-1350P faster if the specifications are nearly identical?

A: The boost clock is the key difference: 4.70 GHz on the i5-1350P against 4.60 GHz on the i5-1340P, with the same 1900 MHz base clock. That single higher bin accounts for the uniform performance advantage.

Q: Do both chips support the same memory and connectivity?

A: Yes. Both support dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, both provide PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, both lack ECC support, and both use the same Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units.

Q: What was the launch MSRP of each?

A: The i5-1340P launched at $353 and the i5-1350P launched at $320.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Every recorded test goes the same way, which is itself informative: uniform deltas across three Cinebench generations indicate a stable, binning-driven gap rather than a workload-specific quirk.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-1350P scored 1664 against 1584 for the i5-1340P, a 4.8 percent win. The R15 single-core result was 234 versus 223, a 4.7 percent win, the smallest gap in the dataset and still decisive. Cinebench R20 multi-core went to the i5-1350P 6935 to 6600, again 4.8 percent, while R20 single-core was 979 versus 931, the largest single-core gap at 4.9 percent.

The modern Cinebench R23 numbers carry the most weight for current comparisons. Multi-core: 16514 for the i5-1350P versus 15716 for the i5-1340P, 4.8 percent apart. Single-core: 2331 versus 2218, also 4.8 percent. The i5-1350P's total sweep is six wins from six tests, and no benchmark in the database shows the i5-1340P ahead in any category.

For wider context, the i5-1350P's average score of 4776 places it within half a percent of some formidable company: the Intel Xeon W-1290E at 4775, the AMD EPYC 7252 at 4772, the Intel Xeon E-2386G at 4799, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X at 4807. The i5-1340P's rivals cluster at a slightly lower tier, including the Intel Core i7-10700KF at 4547, essentially dead even, and the Intel Core i5-1250P at 4515. In other words, the i5-1350P's one-bin advantage is worth roughly a full tier of competitive positioning in the database.

Specification Differences

The complete list of differences between these two processors is short:

• Boost clock: 4.60 GHz on the i5-1340P versus 4.70 GHz on the i5-1350P
• Launch MSRP: $353 for the i5-1340P versus $320 for the i5-1350P
• Part number: SRMJ7 for the i5-1340P versus SRMJ5 for the i5-1350P
• Average benchmark score: 4545 for the i5-1340P versus 4776 for the i5-1350P
• Percentile versus all CPUs: 58 for the i5-1340P versus 59 for the i5-1350P

Everything else matches: 12 cores, 16 threads, a 1900 MHz base clock, 28-watt TDP, Raptor Lake architecture on the Raptor Lake-P codename, Intel's 10 nm process, Intel BGA 1744 socket, 80 KB per-core L1, 2 MB per-core L2, 12 MB shared L3, dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 support, no ECC, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, mobile market segment, active production status, the same launch date, and a locked multiplier on both. The data reduces this comparison to a single question: whether the higher boost bin is available, and the recorded benchmarks say it is worth taking when it is.