AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Intel Core i5-13400F Comparison

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS are both 16-thread processors that land in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, but they serve entirely different markets. The data shows the Intel part is a desktop powerhouse that dominates in almost every compute-heavy benchmark, while the AMD chip is a mobile processor with a much lower thermal envelope and integrated graphics. The Core i5-13400F wins 19 of 23 head-to-head tests, often by massive margins, making it the clear choice for users building a desktop who prioritize raw performance. The Ryzen 7 7735HS, despite its lower scores, is the only one of the two that can power a laptop without a discrete GPU, making it the sensible pick for mobile users who need 16 threads and a built-in Radeon 680M. The data is unambiguous: if you need the fastest processor for a fixed desktop socket, the Intel CPU wins; if you need a self-contained mobile solution, the AMD CPU is the only option.

The Verdict

The benchmark results point to a decisive victory for the Intel Core i5-13400F. Its average benchmark score of 25292 is nearly identical to the AMD's 25147, but the distribution of wins is lopsided. The Intel chip wins 19 of 23 direct head-to-head tests, including every major Cinebench and Geekbench workload. The most dramatic gap is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel scores 22604 versus the AMD's 13106, a 72.5% advantage. For desktop users, this is a simple choice: the Intel Core i5-13400F delivers superior multi-threaded and single-threaded performance across the board. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS only wins four tests, which are data encryption, extended instructions, integer math, and one 3DMark 8-thread test. These wins are too narrow to recommend the AMD part for any desktop workload. However, the AMD chip has a 35W TDP, integrated Radeon 680M graphics, and ECC memory support, making it the only viable option for a thin-and-light laptop where a discrete GPU is not desired. The verdict is straightforward: pick the Intel Core i5-13400F for a desktop, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS for a laptop.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, known as Raptor Lake-S, using a 10 nm process node at Intel's fabs. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its cache hierarchy features 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This desktop part runs at a 65W TDP and fits the Intel Socket 1700. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Notably, it has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is a mobile chip based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a higher base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The cache layout is smaller: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Its TDP is just 35W, which is nearly half of the Intel's, and it uses the AMD Socket FP7. This part supports only DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. It offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and it includes integrated Radeon 680M graphics. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. The process node advantage and lower TDP make the AMD more power-efficient, but the Intel part compensates with more cores and a much larger L3 cache.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-13400F claims overwhelming victories in the most demanding tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 3191 versus AMD's 1546, a staggering 106.4% delta. The multi-core R23 result shows Intel at 22604 against AMD's 13106, a 72.5% lead. Geekbench multi-core gives Intel a 36.4% win (11068 vs 8114), and single-core shows a 17.5% edge (1996 vs 1699). These are not small margins; they indicate a generational difference in compute capability. The Intel part also dominates in Passmark's physics test, scoring 1437 against 1073, a 33.9% gain, and in floating-point math, where it posts 60539 versus 47865, a 26.5% advantage. Even in prime number finding, Intel leads by 40.7% (83 vs 59). The 3DMark suite follows the same pattern, with Intel winning 16-thread, 2-thread, 4-thread, max-thread, and single-thread tests, with deltas ranging from 2.3% to 6.5%.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS has a few narrow wins that are worth noting. In Passmark data encryption, it scores 18237 versus Intel's 16608, an 8.9% lead. In integer math, AMD wins 85309 versus 79942, a 6.3% advantage. The extended instructions test is very close, with AMD at 20050 and Intel at 19847, a 1% delta. The only 3DMark win for AMD comes in the 8-thread test, where it scores 5697 against Intel's 5591, a 1.9% edge. These wins are consistent with AMD's higher boost clock and architecture efficiency in specific integer and crypto workloads, but they do not offset the massive losses in Cinebench and Geekbench. The data shows that while AMD has a small niche in certain instruction sets, the Intel processor is faster in every general-purpose compute task.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F is significantly faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 22604 versus the AMD's 13106, a 72.5% lead. Geekbench multi-core shows a 36.4% advantage for Intel (11068 vs 8114).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon 680M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-13400F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU to output video.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel part has a 65W TDP, while the AMD part has a 35W TDP. This makes the AMD chip much more suitable for mobile devices where power consumption is critical.

Q: Which CPU wins in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F wins decisively. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 3191 versus 1546, a 106.4% delta. Passmark single-thread shows Intel at 3634 versus 3296, a 10.3% edge.

Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS be used in a desktop?

A: The data lists it as a mobile processor with an AMD Socket FP7. The Intel Core i5-13400F uses Intel Socket 1700. The benchmarks are valid for comparison, but the AMD chip is designed for laptops.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-13400F does not support ECC.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13400F is the clear winner for desktop compute tasks. It takes the top spot in all Cinebench R15 and R23 tests, all Geekbench tests, and the majority of Passmark tests. Specific wins include a 72.5% margin in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a 106.4% margin in single-core, and a 40.7% margin in prime number finding. It also wins in floating-point math by 26.5% and physics by 33.9%. For anyone running video rendering, 3D modeling, software compilation, or any multi-threaded desktop app, the Intel chip is the superior choice. Its 20 MB of L3 cache and 10 cores provide a substantial advantage in throughput. The only Intel losses are in data encryption, integer math, and extended instructions, which are narrow and unlikely to impact typical desktop workflows.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS wins in four specific areas: data encryption (8.9% lead), extended instructions (1% lead), integer math (6.3% lead), and the 3DMark 8-thread test (1.9% lead). These wins are relevant for workloads like cryptography, certain scientific calculations, and integer-heavy data processing. However, the AMD chip's most significant advantage is not in raw performance but in its platform features. It has a 35W TDP, integrated Radeon 680M graphics, and ECC memory support, making it the only option for a compact laptop that needs 16 threads without a discrete GPU. The data shows that for mobile users who need a self-contained processor with decent compute capability and low power draw, the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is the winner. For desktop builders, the Intel Core i5-13400F is the unequivocal performance champion.