Intel Core i5-1240P vs Intel Xeon E-2374G Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark split between the Intel Xeon E-2374G and the Intel Core i5-1240P is not a simple matter of one part being universally faster. The data shows a clear division of labor: the Xeon E-2374G takes the newest multi-core workload, while the Core i5-1240P dominates everything else in the recorded benchmark suite.

The Core i5-1240P wins four of the six head-to-head tests. Its advantages are most pronounced in the older Cinebench R15 and R20 workloads, where it leads by double-digit percentages in both single-core and multi-core runs. The Xeon E-2374G, by contrast, wins only two tests: the Cinebench R23 multi-core test and a tie in the R23 single-core test. This split suggests the two processors are tuned for different generations of software workloads, with the mobile Core i5 handling traditional productivity tasks more effectively while the server Xeon shows its strength in the most recent rendering benchmark.

Looking at the average benchmark scores, the Xeon E-2374G posts an average of 3278 across all recorded tests, while the Core i5-1240P sits at 3202. Both processors land at the 53rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy the same overall performance tier despite their different workload profiles. The nearest rivals for the Xeon include the Intel Core i3-12100T at 3277 and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 at 3277, both essentially tied with a 0% delta, while the Core i5-1240P sits near the Intel Core i3-13100T at 3198 (0.1% ahead) and the Intel Core i7-9700E at 3197 (0.2% ahead).

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial. The Xeon E-2374G belongs to the Xeon E-2300 series, built on Intel's Rocket Lake architecture (specifically Rocket Lake-E), and uses a 14 nm process node. It is a server and workstation part with a die size of 276 mm², a 4-core, 8-thread configuration, and a TDP of 80 watts. The Core i5-1240P hails from the Alder Lake family (Alder Lake-P), uses a smaller 10 nm process node with a 217 mm² die, and packs 12 cores and 16 threads into a mobile package with a 28-watt TDP.

The core count difference is stark: the Xeon offers 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i5 offers 12 cores and 16 threads. This three-fold core advantage for the mobile part explains its multi-core wins in the R15 and R20 tests. However, the Xeon compensates with a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.40 GHz for the Core i5, though the Core i5's base clock is recorded as 1700.00 MHz, which is unusual and likely reflects a low base frequency design typical of mobile processors.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the Xeon carries 512 KB of L2 per core while the Core i5 has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 8 MB shared for the Xeon and 12 MB shared for the Core i5. Memory support diverges as well: the Xeon supports only DDR4 with dual-channel access and a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, plus ECC memory support. The Core i5 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but has no ECC support and no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Both parts use PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics tell a similar story of different market positioning. The Xeon includes UHD Graphics P750, while the Core i5 features Iris Xe 80EU, a more capable integrated GPU for a mobile part. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1200 for the Xeon, Intel BGA 1744 for the Core i5. The Xeon launched in September 2021 with a launch MSRP of $334, while the Core i5 launched in February 2022 with no recorded launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows the Core i5-1240P with a score of 1566.5 against the Xeon's 1142, a delta of negative 27.1% for the Xeon, meaning the Core i5 outperforms it by roughly 27%. The single-core R15 test follows the same pattern: 226 for the Core i5 versus 161 for the Xeon, a negative 28.8% delta. These are the largest margins in the entire comparison, indicating that the Core i5's architectural advantages are most visible in this older benchmark.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the Core i5 continues its winning streak. In multi-core, it scores 5632 against the Xeon's 4760, a negative 15.5% delta for the Xeon. The single-core R20 test also shows a negative 15.5% delta, with the Core i5 at 795 and the Xeon at 672. These margins are smaller than in R15 but still decisive, suggesting the newer benchmark narrows the gap somewhat.

The picture flips in Cinebench R23. The Xeon E-2374G takes the multi-core test with a score of 11335, while the Core i5-1240P scores 9392, giving the Xeon a positive delta of 20.7%. This is a remarkable turnaround: the 4-core Xeon beats the 12-core Core i5 by over 20% in the most recent multi-core rendering workload. The single-core R23 test ends in a perfect tie at 1600 for both processors, recorded as a 0% delta with the Xeon listed as the winner by default.

Interpreting these results, the data indicates that the Core i5-1240P excels in older and mid-generation benchmarks, likely benefiting from its higher core count and newer memory support. The Xeon E-2374G, however, pulls ahead in the latest Cinebench version, which may reflect better optimization for high-clock, low-core-count designs or differences in how the workloads scale across the two architectures.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-1240P has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2374G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference in Cinebench R23?

A: The two processors are exactly tied in Cinebench R23 single-core, both scoring 1600.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Xeon E-2374G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-1240P does not.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2374G has a TDP of 80 watts, while the Intel Core i5-1240P has a TDP of 28 watts.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2374G has an average benchmark score of 3278, while the Intel Core i5-1240P has an average of 3202. Both sit at the 53rd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2374G supports DDR4 only. The Intel Core i5-1240P supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2374G | Intel Core i5-1240P |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.70 GHz | 1700.00 MHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 80 watts | 28 watts |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Rocket Lake | Alder Lake |

| Codename | Rocket Lake-E | Alder Lake-P |

| Process node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Die size | 276 mm² | 217 mm² |

| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics P750 | Iris Xe 80EU |

| Market segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release date | September 2021 | February 2022 |

| Launch MSRP | $334 | None recorded |

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the Intel Core i5-1240P is the better choice for users who prioritize older and mid-generation Cinebench workloads, where it leads by 15.5% to 28.8% across R15 and R20 tests in both single-core and multi-core runs. Its 12 cores, 16 threads, and support for DDR5 memory make it the more versatile part for general productivity and mobile computing scenarios. It also comes with a much lower TDP of 28 watts, making it suitable for thin-and-light systems.

The Intel Xeon E-2374G, however, is the pick for the newest rendering workload recorded. Its 20.7% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core is significant, and it ties in R23 single-core. The Xeon also brings ECC memory support, a server-grade feature that the Core i5 lacks, along with a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a larger die size. Its launch MSRP of $334 positions it as a workstation part, and its active production status suggests ongoing availability for server and workstation builds.

For a mobile user running typical productivity software, the Core i5-1240P is the logical choice based on the benchmark data. For a workstation or server workload that relies on the latest Cinebench generation and requires ECC memory, the Xeon E-2374G is the stronger candidate. Neither processor dominates entirely, and the final decision should hinge on which benchmark generation matters most for the intended use case.