Intel Core i5-110 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons for the Intel Core i5-110 and the Intel Core i5-14501E. Both processors share a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, according to the aggregate data, and both carry an average benchmark score of zero in the current dataset. The absence of recorded deltas means the measured wins column shows zero for each part. This is not a statement about real-world equivalence; it simply reflects that no matched-pair test results have been entered into the database yet.

Without direct comparison scores, the available clock and cache figures provide the only quantitative basis for projecting performance relationships. The Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, which is 0.90 GHz higher than the Core i5-110's 4.30 GHz boost ceiling. Its base clock of 3.30 GHz also exceeds the Core i5-110's 2.90 GHz base by 0.40 GHz. In single-threaded workloads, where frequency dominates, that 0.90 GHz advantage would likely translate into a meaningful lead for the Raptor Lake part, but the database does not yet contain a measured score to confirm the magnitude.

The Core i5-14501E also doubles the L3 cache, holding 24 MB shared versus 12 MB shared for the Core i5-110. That doubling could show up in cache-sensitive workloads such as database queries, compression tasks, or certain simulation loops. The L2 cache difference is starker still: 1.25 MB per core for the 14501E, compared to 256 KB per core for the 110. That is a 5x per-core increase, which can reduce memory traffic and improve latency tolerance in multi-threaded code. The Core i5-110 counters with a smaller die, but no die size is recorded for it, so no density comparison is possible from the data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The 14501E also starts from a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 2.90 GHz.

Q: Do both CPUs have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes. Both are 6-core, 12-thread desktop processors. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The Core i5-110 does not list ECC support.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core i5-110 supports DDR4 only. The Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: How do the integrated graphics differ?

A: The Core i5-110 includes UHD Graphics 630. The Core i5-14501E includes UHD Graphics 770, a newer generation.

Q: Which CPU has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core i5-14501E has 24 MB shared L3 cache. The Core i5-110 has 12 MB shared L3 cache, exactly half.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel architectural families. The Core i5-110 uses Comet Lake, built on Intel's 14 nm process. The Core i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process. That node difference affects transistor density and power characteristics, though the database records a 65 W TDP for both parts.

Socket compatibility is a major divider. The Core i5-110 fits Intel Socket 1200, while the Core i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700. These are not interchangeable, so motherboard choice is locked to the respective socket generation. The PCIe implementation also differs: the Core i5-110 provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core i5-14501E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. That quadrupling of PCIe generation could matter for high-throughput storage or GPU workloads.

Cache hierarchy diverges significantly. The Core i5-110 has 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The Core i5-14501E has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The L2 jump is the most pronounced: 1.25 MB per core versus 256 KB per core, a five-fold increase that can absorb more working set data before hitting main memory.

Memory support also splits. The Core i5-110 is limited to DDR4 with dual-channel access and a recorded 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, though no bandwidth figure is recorded for it. ECC memory is available only on the 14501E, which can matter for workstation or server-adjacent builds. The integrated graphics differ as well: UHD Graphics 630 on the 110 versus UHD Graphics 770 on the 14501E. The 14501E also lists a die size of 215 mm², while the 110 has no die size recorded.

Release timing differs by over a year. The Core i5-14501E launched on 2024-06-30, while the Core i5-110 launched on 2025-09-10. That means the 110 arrived later despite being based on the older Comet Lake architecture. The 110 does carry a launch MSRP of $200, while the 14501E has no recorded MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear architectural gap between the two CPUs. The Core i5-14501E holds advantages in every measurable performance-relevant category: higher base and boost clocks, larger L1, L2, and L3 caches, newer process node, newer socket with PCIe Gen 5, broader memory support, ECC capability, and a newer integrated graphics unit. The Core i5-110 counters with a later release date and a $200 launch MSRP, but the database shows no benchmark wins for either part.

Given the frequency and cache deltas, the Core i5-14501E should be expected to win most compute-bound tests. The 0.90 GHz boost advantage alone is substantial for single-threaded responsiveness. The 5x L2 cache increase and doubled L3 point to stronger multi-threaded scaling in workloads that reuse data. The 110's only recorded advantages are its lower launch MSRP and its availability on the Socket 1200 platform, which may matter for users with existing boards.

The 50th percentile ranking for both CPUs suggests they sit in the middle of the database's overall distribution, but that percentile is identical for both, so it does not discriminate between them. The absence of head-to-head scores means the verdict rests on structural specifications rather than measured outcomes. The data supports choosing the 14501E for raw performance, while the 110 remains relevant only for platform-specific builds where Socket 1200 compatibility is a hard requirement.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-110 | Intel Core i5-14501E |

|---|---|---|

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Comet Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Core i5 (Comet Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 215 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Launch MSRP | $200 | Not recorded |

| Release Date | 2025-09-10 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | SA35X | Q49HSRNJM |

Shared specifications include 6 cores, 12 threads, 65 W TDP, dual-channel memory bus, desktop market segment, active production status, and a locked multiplier. Neither CPU records a benchmark score, and both sit at the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins on raw compute headroom. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock gives it a clear edge in single-threaded tasks like legacy software, lightly threaded games, or interactive workloads where per-core speed matters more than core count. The 24 MB L3 and 1.25 MB per-core L2 make it the better choice for data-heavy loops, virtualization workloads that thrash caches, or any application with a large working set that fits within 24 MB.

The 14501E also wins on platform modernity. PCIe Gen 5 doubles the per-lane bandwidth ceiling compared to Gen 3, which future-proofs storage and GPU connectivity. DDR5 support opens a newer memory ecosystem, and ECC support broadens its appeal for error-sensitive computing. The UHD Graphics 770 is a newer iGPU generation than the 630, which should deliver better media engine capabilities and display outputs, though the database does not record specific iGPU benchmarks.

The Intel Core i5-110 wins only in narrow platform-specific scenarios. Its Socket 1200 compatibility makes it a drop-in option for users who already own a Comet Lake motherboard and do not want to replace the board. Its $200 launch MSRP is the only recorded price advantage, though the 14501E has no MSRP on file, so no direct price comparison is possible. The 110's 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded figure, but that only matters if the 14501E's unrecorded bandwidth turns out to be lower, which is unlikely given its DDR5 support.

For new builds, the data favors the 14501E on every performance specification. For upgrades to existing Socket 1200 systems, the 110 offers a path that avoids board replacement, but that is a compatibility decision, not a performance one. The database shows no measured wins for either part, so the split is structural: the 14501E leads in compute, cache, memory, and I/O capability, while the 110 leads only in launch timing and recorded price.