Intel Core i3-9100T vs Intel Core i7-4810MQ Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-4810MQ has 8 threads, while the Intel Core i3-9100T has 4 threads. Both processors have 4 physical cores.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-4810MQ scores 5129, which is 7.1% higher than the Intel Core i3-9100T's 4788. The i7-4810MQ wins every Cinebench test in the comparison.

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-9100T win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the i3-9100T wins both Geekbench tests. It scores 3443 in Geekbench multi-core versus 3203 for the i7-4810MQ, a 7% advantage, and 1215 in single-core versus 1106, a 9% advantage.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Intel Core i7-4810MQ supports DDR3 memory, while the Intel Core i3-9100T supports DDR4 memory. The i3-9100T also has a higher memory bandwidth at 38.4 GB/s compared to 25.6 GB/s.

Q: Which processor is newer?

A: The Intel Core i3-9100T was released in 2018, while the Intel Core i7-4810MQ was released in 2014. The i3-9100T is the more recent part.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, only the Intel Core i3-9100T has ECC memory support. The Intel Core i7-4810MQ does not support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras. The Intel Core i7-4810MQ uses the Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process node, while the Intel Core i3-9100T uses the Coffee Lake architecture on a 14 nm node. The i7-4810MQ has a larger die at 177 mm² and contains 1,400 million transistors, whereas the i3-9100T has a smaller die at 126 mm² with no transistor count recorded in the database.

Threading is a major differentiator. The i7-4810MQ supports Hyper-Threading, giving it 8 threads across 4 cores. The i3-9100T is a 4-core, 4-thread part without that capability. This thread advantage helps the i7-4810MQ in multi-threaded Cinebench workloads, as reflected in the benchmark results.

Cache configurations are identical in structure: both have 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Integrated graphics differ, with the i7-4810MQ featuring Intel HD 4600 and the i3-9100T featuring UHD Graphics 630. Memory support also diverges, with the i7-4810MQ using DDR3 and the i3-9100T using DDR4, the latter offering higher theoretical bandwidth.

The market segments differ as well. The i7-4810MQ is a mobile processor on Intel Socket G3, while the i3-9100T is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1151. Both are end-of-life products. Clock speeds are close: the i7-4810MQ has a 2.80 GHz base and 3.80 GHz boost, while the i3-9100T has a 3.10 GHz base and 3.70 GHz boost. The i3-9100T has a lower TDP at 35 W versus 47 W for the i7-4810MQ.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark record is split into two clear groups. The Intel Core i7-4810MQ dominates all Cinebench tests, while the Intel Core i3-9100T wins both Geekbench tests. The i7-4810MQ takes 6 of the 8 recorded head-to-head comparisons.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-4810MQ scores 516 against 482 for the i3-9100T, a 7.1% lead. The single-core result is similar: 72 versus 67, a 7.5% margin. Cinebench R20 shows the same pattern, with the i7-4810MQ at 2154 versus 2010 in multi-core (7.2% ahead) and 304 versus 283 in single-core (7.4% ahead). Cinebench R23 continues the trend: 5129 versus 4788 in multi-core (7.1% ahead) and 724 versus 675 in single-core (7.3% ahead).

The Geekbench results flip the narrative. The i3-9100T scores 3443 in multi-core versus 3203 for the i7-4810MQ, a 7% advantage. In single-core, the i3-9100T leads 1215 to 1106, a 9% margin. These are the only two tests where the i3-9100T comes out ahead, but they show a different performance profile.

The average benchmark scores place the two very close. The i7-4810MQ has an average score of 1651, while the i3-9100T sits at 1620. The i7-4810MQ ranks at the 40th percentile among all CPUs, and the i3-9100T at the 39th percentile. Both processors sit among similar rivals in the database: the i7-4810MQ is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, Intel Core i5-5675R, Intel Core i5-4670K, and Intel Core i7-5700HQ. The i3-9100T is within 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-970, Intel Pentium Gold G7400T, Intel Core i7-10610U, and Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-4810MQ | Intel Core i3-9100T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 4 |

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.80 GHz | 3.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| TDP | 47 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket G3 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Architecture | Haswell | Coffee Lake |

| Process Node | 22 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | 177 mm² | 126 mm² |

| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2014-01-19 | 2018-08-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $378 | $122 |

Cache sizes are identical between the two: 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-4810MQ is the stronger choice for multi-threaded rendering workloads. Its 8 threads give it a consistent 7.1% to 7.2% advantage over the i3-9100T across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests. It also wins single-core Cinebench tests by 7.3% to 7.5%, meaning the i7-4810MQ is ahead in every Cinebench variant recorded. The 47 W TDP reflects a higher power envelope, which makes sense for a mobile part designed for performance in larger laptops.

The Intel Core i3-9100T is the winner in Geekbench tests. It leads by 7% in multi-core and 9% in single-core, which indicates a stronger showing in workloads that resemble the Geekbench test suite. The i3-9100T also offers DDR4 memory support with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, a 50% higher theoretical bandwidth than the i7-4810MQ's DDR3 at 25.6 GB/s. Its 35 W TDP makes it the more power-efficient part on paper. The i3-9100T also supports ECC memory, which the i7-4810MQ does not, a relevant factor for systems requiring error-correcting memory.

The i7-4810MQ is a mobile processor, so its natural environment is a laptop. The i3-9100T is a desktop processor, suited for a Socket 1151 motherboard. The i7-4810MQ targets users who need the extra threads for Cinebench-style rendering, while the i3-9100T appeals to those who prioritize Geekbench performance, DDR4 memory, and lower power consumption.

The Verdict

The data points to a split decision based on workload. The Intel Core i7-4810MQ wins 6 of the 8 head-to-head benchmarks, including all Cinebench tests, with margins between 7.1% and 7.5%. Its 8 threads give it a clear edge in multi-threaded rendering tasks, and it also edges out the i3-9100T in single-core Cinebench runs. Anyone focused on Cinebench-style workloads should pick the i7-4810MQ.

The Intel Core i3-9100T wins the two Geekbench tests with 7% and 9% margins. It also brings newer memory technology with DDR4 support and higher bandwidth, plus ECC memory capability. Its lower 35 W TDP makes it the more power-conscious option. Users who weight Geekbench results heavily, need ECC memory, or prefer a desktop platform should choose the i3-9100T.

The average scores are close: 1651 for the i7-4810MQ versus 1620 for the i3-9100T, a difference of about 1.9%. Both processors sit near the 39th to 40th percentile in the database, so neither is a standout in the broader CPU landscape. The i7-4810MQ is the better choice for threaded rendering performance, while the i3-9100T is the better choice for Geekbench performance, memory bandwidth, and power efficiency. The verdict depends on which benchmark suite matches the intended use case.