Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Comparison

Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100

The Intel Core 9 273PTE and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 represent two distinct approaches to processor design, separated by architecture, target platform, and the data available for comparison. The Intel part, a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on a 10 nm process, has a full suite of recorded benchmark results, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all tested CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100, an 18-core, 18-thread mobile processor on a 3 nm node, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct quantitative comparison to its architectural and specification sheet. This analysis walks through what the recorded data shows for the Intel part, what the specification differences imply for the Qualcomm part, and how the two compare structurally despite the absence of head-to-head test scores.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded measurements, the Intel Core 9 273PTE delivers its strongest results in multi-threaded workloads, where its 12 cores and 24 threads produce high scores across multiple rendering and compute tests. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the processor records a score of 20445, which is a dominant output for a desktop part in that workload. Cinebench R20 multicore shows 8586, and Cinebench R15 multicore shows 2060, all indicating consistent scaling across the thread count. The PassMark multithread score of 24054 and the PassMark integer math score of 82411 further confirm that the chip excels in parallel compute tasks that can utilize all available threads.

The single-thread performance of the Intel Core 9 273PTE is also strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2886, the Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1212, and the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 290 place it well within competitive desktop territory. The PassMark single thread score of 3433 (listed twice in the database) reinforces this. For workloads that depend on high clock speeds, the boost clock of 5.50 GHz provides a clear advantage.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100, there are no benchmark scores in the database, so any statement about where it wins must be based solely on its specifications. Its 18 cores and 18 threads suggest a design aimed at multi-core throughput, but the lack of SMT (simultaneous multithreading) means it handles one thread per core. The base clock of 4.45 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz are high for a mobile part, indicating strong per-core frequency potential. The memory bandwidth of 228.6 GB/s, supported by LPDDR5X memory over a triple-channel bus, is substantially higher than the Intel part’s 89.6 GB/s, which points to an advantage in memory-intensive workloads such as large data transfers or integrated GPU compute.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between the two processors is significant. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, meaning each core supports two threads via Hyper-Threading technology. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is enabled. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 730. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the processor is unlocked for overclocking? The multiplier is marked as locked, so it is not unlocked. The release date is March 8, 2026, with a launch MSRP of $549.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses the Glymur codename, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has 18 cores and 18 threads, with no multithreading per core. The cache layout differs markedly: 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and 9 MB of shared L3. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X, running on a triple-channel bus with a bandwidth of 228.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by Adreno X2-90. The socket is Qualcomm BGA 2343, and the multiplier is locked. The release date is April 5, 2026. The die size is recorded as 220 mm², while the Intel part has no die size listed.

The process node difference, 10 nm versus 3 nm, is a major factor. The Qualcomm part uses a more advanced fabrication process from TSMC, which typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power consumption per operation. The Intel part, on a 10 nm node from its own foundry, uses a less dense process. The core count also differs: 18 cores versus 12, but the thread count favors Intel at 24 versus 18, because each Intel core can process two threads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database contains no entries, meaning there are no direct test results comparing the Intel Core 9 273PTE against the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100. The recorded wins for each side are zero. This does not mean the processors are equal; it means the database lacks measured scores for the Qualcomm part entirely. The Intel part has 16 benchmark results, while the Qualcomm part has none.

Given this absence, the only quantitative comparison comes from the specification fields and the Intel part’s percentile ranking. The Intel Core 9 273PTE sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 31143. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-12700F with an average score of 31081 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS with an average score of 31074 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-13700TE with an average score of 31028 and a delta of 0.4 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12650HX with an average score of 31290 and a delta of -0.5 percent. These deltas show that the Core 9 273PTE is within a very narrow band of performance around those rivals, slightly ahead of the first three and slightly behind the last one.

For the Qualcomm part, the percentile is listed at 50, but the average benchmark score is 0, which reflects the lack of data. No nearest rivals are recorded. This means any statement about its relative performance to other processors is unsupported by measurements in the database. The data cannot confirm that the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 outperforms or underperforms the Intel part in any specific benchmark.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 9 273PTE is a fully characterized desktop processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20445 and PassMark multithread score of 24054 indicate high throughput for rendering, compilation, and other parallel tasks. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2886 and PassMark single thread score of 3433 indicate solid responsiveness for lightly threaded applications. The 82nd percentile placement confirms that it ranks above the majority of CPUs in the database, with performance essentially matching its nearest rivals within a range of -0.5 to 0.4 percent.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no benchmark scores, so the database cannot verify its performance. Its specifications suggest a mobile processor designed for high memory bandwidth and a high core count, but without measurements, no verdict can be formed on its computational speed. The 3 nm process and 18 cores give it a structural profile distinct from the Intel part, but those specifications do not translate into recorded scores.

For a user selecting between these two, the data supports the Intel Core 9 273PTE as the only option with verified performance metrics. The Qualcomm part remains unquantified. The choice depends on platform: the Intel part targets desktop with Socket 1700 and DDR4/DDR5 support, while the Qualcomm part targets mobile with BGA 2343 and LPDDR5X support. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549. The Qualcomm part has no launch MSRP listed.

FAQ

Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the database records zero benchmark results for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty.

Q: What is the core and thread count for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel bus supporting DDR4 and DDR5. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has a memory bandwidth of 228.6 GB/s over a triple-channel bus supporting LPDDR5X.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses a 3 nm process from TSMC.

Q: Which integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses Adreno X2-90.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core 9 273PTE?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 9 273PTE is $549. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Specification Differences

The principal differences between the Intel Core 9 273PTE and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 are found in the following fields from the database:

• Cores: Intel has 12, Qualcomm has 18.
• Threads: Intel has 24, Qualcomm has 18.
• Base Clock: Intel is 1.40 GHz, Qualcomm is 4.45 GHz.
• Boost Clock: Intel is 5.50 GHz, Qualcomm is 4.70 GHz.
• Process Node: Intel is 10 nm, Qualcomm is 3 nm.
• Foundry: Intel is Intel, Qualcomm is TSMC.
• Die Size: Intel is not listed, Qualcomm is 220 mm².
• L1 Cache: Intel is 80 KB per core, Qualcomm is 288 KB per core.
• L2 Cache: Intel is 2 MB per core, Qualcomm is 16 MB per module.
• L3 Cache: Intel is 36 MB shared, Qualcomm is 9 MB shared.
• Memory Support: Intel is DDR4 and DDR5, Qualcomm is LPDDR5X.
• Memory Bus: Intel is dual-channel, Qualcomm is triple-channel.
• Memory Bandwidth: Intel is 89.6 GB/s, Qualcomm is 228.6 GB/s.
• ECC Memory: Intel supports ECC, Qualcomm does not.
• PCIe: Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes, Qualcomm has Gen 5 with 12 lanes.
• Integrated Graphics: Intel is UHD Graphics 730, Qualcomm is Adreno X2-90.
• Socket: Intel is Intel Socket 1700, Qualcomm is Qualcomm BGA 2343.
• Market Segment: Intel is Desktop, Qualcomm is Mobile.
• Release Date: Intel is 2026-03-08, Qualcomm is 2026-04-05.
• Launch MSRP: Intel is $549, Qualcomm is not listed.
• Average Benchmark Score: Intel is 31143, Qualcomm is 0.
• Percentile: Intel is 82, Qualcomm is 50.