Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 Comparison
Intel Core 9 273PTE
Snapdragon X2E-78-100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100
Intel Core 9 273PTE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100
The Intel Core 9 273PTE and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 occupy different positions in the database, with the Intel part showing a full set of recorded benchmark results while the Qualcomm part has no benchmark entries at this time. The Intel processor holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the Qualcomm processor sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero due to missing data. This creates an asymmetric comparison where the analysis must rely primarily on architectural specifications and the Intel chip's measured performance profile.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins in every measured category because it is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data. Its benchmark suite covers Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core tests, plus a range of PassMark workloads including integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, and physics. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no benchmark scores in the database, so there are zero wins for either side in head-to-head testing. The data shows the Intel part delivering a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 20445 and a single-core score of 2886, while the Qualcomm part cannot be positioned against these numbers. In terms of market segments, the Intel chip targets desktop systems with a 45 TDP rating, while the Qualcomm chip targets mobile platforms, so the use-case split is defined by platform rather than by benchmark outcomes. The Intel processor also supports ECC memory, which the Qualcomm part does not, indicating a server or workstation-oriented capability that the mobile chip lacks.
Architecture Differences
The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying design. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The Intel chip is based on the Bartlett Lake codename with a Core 9 generation label, whereas the Qualcomm chip uses the Glymur codename under the Snapdragon X2 Elite generation. Both processors have 12 cores, but the Intel part supports 24 threads through hyperthreading, while the Qualcomm part has 12 threads, meaning each core handles a single thread. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Qualcomm chip has a base clock of 4.00 GHz with no recorded boost clock. The Intel processor fits into Intel Socket 1700, while the Qualcomm processor uses Qualcomm BGA 2343. The Intel chip has a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3, while the Qualcomm chip has 288 KB L1 per core and 16 MB shared L2 with no L3 cache listed. The die size for the Qualcomm part is 220 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support, while the Qualcomm chip supports LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel mode with 152.4 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC. The Intel part offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Qualcomm part offers PCIe Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well, with the Intel chip using UHD Graphics 730 and the Qualcomm chip using Adreno X2-85.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has an empty benchmark array. The Intel Core 9 273PTE, however, provides a complete performance profile that can be examined independently. In Cinebench R15, the Intel chip scores 2060 in multi-core and 290 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8586 multi-core and 1212 single-core. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 20445 and single-core is 2886. PassMark results show a multithread score of 24054, a single-thread score of 3433, integer math at 82411, floating point math at 60673, data compression at 258704, data encryption at 14253, extended instructions at 15952, find prime numbers at 142, physics at 1917, and random string sorting at 28973. The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Intel chip's standing. The Intel Core i7-12700F has an average score of 31081 with a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS shows 31074 with a 0.2 percent delta, the Intel Core i7-13700TE shows 31028 with a 0.4 percent delta, and the Intel Core i7-12650HX shows 31290 with a negative 0.5 percent delta. These margins are narrow, indicating the Core 9 273PTE sits within a tight performance cluster around the 31000 to 31300 average score range.
FAQ
Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What is the process node for each chip?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a 3 nm process from TSMC.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports ECC memory, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 does not.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE delivers 89.6 GB/s bandwidth with DDR4 and DDR5 support, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 delivers 152.4 GB/s bandwidth with LPDDR5X support.
Q: What are the market segments for these processors?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE targets the desktop market with a 45 TDP, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 targets the mobile market with no TDP recorded.
Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?
A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has a base clock of 4.00 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 9 273PTE's base clock of 1.40 GHz, although the Intel chip boosts to 5.50 GHz.
The Verdict
The data supports a clear separation by platform and capability. The Intel Core 9 273PTE is the only processor with measurable benchmark results, so any performance comparison defaults to its favor. It provides 24 threads versus 12, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, ECC memory support, and a substantial 36 MB shared L3 cache, making it suited for desktop workloads that benefit from high multi-threaded throughput. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 offers a higher base clock of 4.00 GHz, a smaller 3 nm process node, a 220 mm² die size, and higher memory bandwidth at 152.4 GB/s, but it has no recorded benchmark scores to validate real-world performance. The Intel chip's nearest rivals all sit within a 0.5 percent delta of its average score, indicating it performs on par with established mid-range desktop processors. Buyers choosing between these two parts will select the Intel chip for desktop computing with verified throughput numbers, or the Qualcomm chip for mobile platforms where lower power consumption and integrated Adreno X2-85 graphics are priorities. The absence of Qualcomm benchmark data means the database cannot confirm how the Snapdragon part performs relative to the Intel part in any workload.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Core 9 273PTE | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 |
|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------|
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Base Clock | 1.40 GHz | 4.00 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | Not recorded |
| TDP | 45 | Not recorded |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |
| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Glymur |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| Die Size | Not recorded | 220 mm² |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 16 MB (shared) |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | Not recorded |
| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 152.4 GB/s |
| ECC Memory | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 12 Lanes |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Adreno X2-85 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2026-04-05 |
| Launch MSRP | $549 | Not recorded |